Guys,
to set things straight:
A DSI intake was tested by LockMart on an F-16. It was a testbed for the F-35, that has DSI intakes.
DSI has 2 advantages that I can see from the top of my head:
For a stealthy airplane like the F-35, it means a simple, affordable way to avoid a radar return as it disposes with moving parts (remember that this was the original goal of the JSF: cheap)
For a non stealthy airplane like the JF-17, it means doing away with the complexity of a movable intake, so, the availability of a Mach 1+ airplane at lower maintenance costs, and less needs for highly qualified personnel.
So, could we now stop with that fetish ? Yes, it is quite unique feature on combat aircraft at this time, no it will not change the world, or make it a batter aircraft. Just cheaper to operate.
Sorry for those here who think that they should boast for every move their country makes. This forum isn’t a warzone. Here is a place where you can discuss and learn from each other. If you come with another intention, it might not end well.
No need to report posts because facts are put forward, this isn’t trolling.
May I also point out that abusing the post report system might also earn a ban ?
Btw there are fixed intakes allowing supersonic speed without DSI…
Sign In
