Hi!
I don’t know what happened, but my first post is missing (page 6, 4th March 2013). I haven’t deleted it. 🙁
Yes i looked for it to giva a link on starstreak 😡
Do SAAF Grippens have BVR missiles?
AMRAAM as in other countries i guess.
Upgraded F/A-18 to begin test flights; offer Navy alternative to F-35C
by BRENDAN MCGARRY on APRIL 8, 2013
Boeing Co. as early as this summer will fly for the first time an upgraded version of the F/A-18 Super Hornet that it’s pitching to the U.S. Navy as an alternative to the Lockheed Martin Corp.-made F-35, a Boeing vice president said.
A Super Hornet outfitted with a weapons pod on its belly, an avionics system in the cockpit featuring a touch-screen pad, and other modifications will begin test flights in late summer or early fall from St. Louis and then from Naval Air Station Patuxent River in Md., according to Mike Gibbons, vice president of F/A-18 programs at Chicago-based Boeing.
The improvements, to include new engines made by General Electric Co., are part of a company investment designed to provide the service with an alternative to the F-35 Lightning II during a period of tightening defense budgets, Gibbons said today at the Sea-Air-Space exhibition, a three-day conference at National Harbor, Maryland, organized by the Navy League.
“We’re not trying to replace the F-35,” he said in an interview after a media briefing. “We’re just trying to give the Navy solutions as they look at that fleet mix and figure out what works best.”
The F-35 program, known as the Joint Strike Fighter, is the Defense Department’s most expensive acquisition effort, estimated to cost almost $400 billion for a total of 2,443 aircraft. The Navy plans to buy about 260 of the Navy variant of the plane known as F-35C, designed to take off from and land on aircraft carriers.
Even the Navy’s top officer has questioned the need for a stealth naval aircraft such as the F-35 given advances in radar technology. In an editorial last year in “Proceedings,” a monthly magazine published by the U.S. Naval Institute, Adm. Jonathan Greenert, chief of naval operations, argued that “we need to move from ‘luxury-car’ platforms — with their built-in capabilities — toward dependable ‘trucks’ that can handle a changing payload selection.”
During a speech this morning, Greenert defended the F-35. “I need the fifth-generation strike fighter,” he said. “We’re all in, but it has to perform.”
Regardless, Boeing wants the F/A-18 to be that cheaper workhorse for the Navy.
“Everybody needs defense dollars to stretch further,” Gibbons said. “That’s why the Super Hornet looks good right now.”
The Defense Department faces $1 trillion in cuts over the next decade under deficit-reduction legislation passed in 2011. Half of that, about $500 billion, will come from automatic, across-the-board cuts — unless Congress and the White House agree to an alternative spending plan.
Read more: http://defensetech.org/2013/04/08/upgraded-fa-18-to-begin-test-flights-offer-navy-alternative-to-f-35c/#ixzz2Pxu23JUW
Defense.org
Only 2000D (60) should be modernized … Awaiting for Rafale . But who knows with possible budget cuts.
Yes, but Romans discarded it as useless Swerve 😉
kidding of course.
I think he is getting at the sources say peak power of Rbe2 AESA to be 13 kW… And upgradable provision to a more powerful electric generation and potential interferences with spectra.
rkumar, BlackArcher, halloweene – interesting to read what you say.
It is interesting to learn that there should be an election within a few months in India and that may put pressure on the current administration either to sign a deal ASAP or the opposite – to defer until after the elections.
I assume that having HAL as prime integrator is central to the MMRCA project and that this cannot be changed. halloweene says that Dassault do not reject this arrangement. It is reported that India insists that it wants to contract solely with Dassault, Dassault therefore being responsible for the execution of all that is contracted by India. HAL would be paid by Dassault, wouldn’t they?
If provision were made for Dassault to withold payment to HAL in the event of problems arising in local assembly so that HAL had to take action to recover those funds, that would help mitigate Dassault’s risk if HAL fell short of doing its job according to its contract with Dassault. Since HAL is owned by GOI, GOI would effectively be taking the risk of years of investigation to establish responsibility for shortfalls in local assembly performance.
Might such an arrangement work? I don’t know but if there is an impasse you have to try to find some way of changing things while still observing the basic conditions stipulated for the deal: Dassault to be the sole contractor and HAL to be their subcontractor.
You got a point.

Bugatti 100P (’30ies design). There’s a project to make it fly (as it was near completed in 1939), well at least a replica, donator’s welcome.
The real question is if India would be ready to pay for such a level of ToT.
I thought that the link was perfectly obvious but this kind of post imply that it is not, so, again, if you ask a company the transfert of their most secret assets, you must PAY for that.
You must pay so much that they will be in a good position (well, more or less) to develop the next generation.
Spectra alone means billions.
and 250 kgs 😀
Maybe on purpose?
We’re arent anymore at this stage, Dassault agreed Hal as prime contractor. The question raised is responsability. Noone want another Scorpene responsability…
But i guess its also usual business game…
Regarding MKI. Don’t they(IAF) have western sniper Pods mounted? There’s some vids from RD 2008 where they had pods..
So its just a matter of ordering more advanced sniper Pods for MKI.
They do have NC and Heavy Cruise missile capability as well.The Russian A2G ordinance might not be up to Western standard(yet), but the MKI have a good A2G mission suite.
i was not at all criticizing A2G capabilities of MKI. Just saying it’s not leaned towards A2G more then towards A2A (imo)
Failure would be a disaster for both parties, which is why it will not happen. But for this very reason that each cannot afford to let deal fail, each party feels it has a lot of room to push the other, which makes for breathless news stories in the interim. :p
+1
More fun then “Dallas”… Keep us busy and young 😉
Well, you have to go to Asia to find 50~100 watt AESA TRMs.
GaN AESA TRM fabrication process is very similar to GaN blue laser diode and LED fabrication process. And guess which countries own GaN diode and LED markets.
50-100 watt in labs. I’m not contesting Asian products quality and tech. I’m contesting the fact that Europe would be so far behind US and ASIA about semi conductors. You will find STmicro chips in asian made cell phones…
As views expressed here look balanced, i wont flame :). I’d simply mention that Mirage 2000 D (“bomber”) will be the last type replaced by Rafale… And i’m not sure SU30 MKI can be quoted as A2G leaned. (specially with incoming upgrades).
@djcross you will allways have evident gains in more versatile aircrafts no?