December 28, 2004 at 4:21 pm
Hi all,
I have spent some time today in the archive of this forum and enjoyed the many threads about scrapyards in the sixties, seventies and eighties. And the photo’s posted (by Mark 12 and 682al, to name but a view) showing Spitfire, Typhoon and Lancaster remains are extremely interesting. Also the photo’s posted by Cestrian were very intriguing.
Any more where that came from?
Cheers
Cees
By: Mondariz - 2nd March 2008 at 17:18
Hi Peter,
Pictures I post here are generally from Flickr, where users post under creative commons 2.0 which means that non-profit use is permitted.
If the Flickr poster have posted the image without ownership, it would legally be his copyright infringement, as you can’t release under creative commons unless you own, or have rights, to the material.
Another fine photo site is http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Main_Page
Here the media files are also mostly under creative commons or a lower classification.
By: Peter - 2nd March 2008 at 17:04
I give credit when i have some to give. If I don’t know, then I can’t give it.
How many wartime photos are given credit?
Not to the current owner, but to the actual photographer.
We could clear a large percentage of photos in this forum, if ever single photo needed credit to be posted.
But if thats the etiquette here, I will refrain from posting pictures, as I don’t really have any personal pictures that are usefull to historic aviation.
Some valid points but please keep in mind rule number 4 of the code of conduct.
4) As well as text-based discussion, contributors are welcome to post their own or any other material that they have the legal right to post. Any copied material posted must be owned by the contributor or consent must be obtained and credit given. If any question arises regarding the ownership of the material it will be removed. All materials posted are at the risk of the contributor and owners of Key Publishing Ltd Aviation Forums will not be held responsible in any way. Any disputes are settled solely within the English legal system.
Peter
Moderator
By: Mondariz - 2nd March 2008 at 15:16
Etiquette, not copyright.
Credit where due, please.
Mark
I give credit when i have some to give. If I don’t know, then I can’t give it.
How many wartime photos are given credit?
Not to the current owner, but to the actual photographer.
We could clear a large percentage of photos in this forum, if ever single photo needed credit to be posted.
But if thats the etiquette here, I will refrain from posting pictures, as I don’t really have any personal pictures that are usefull to historic aviation.
By: Mark12 - 2nd March 2008 at 15:07
When people post in a public forum (or on flickr where i seem to remember i got this) they are posted under common usage licens and reposting them does not constitutes copyright infringement, as long as they are not used for economical reasons (used in books ect).
Etiquette, not copyright.
Credit where due, please.
Mark
By: Mondariz - 2nd March 2008 at 14:46
Mondariz,
Forum etiquette.
May I suggest that if you cannot remember where you got got them from, you don’t post them.
Mark
When people post in a public forum (or on flickr where i seem to remember i got this) they are posted under common usage licens and reposting them does not constitutes copyright infringement, as long as they are not used for economical reasons (used in books ect).
By: cestrian - 2nd March 2008 at 14:26
I’ve found a few more photos from Clayton Vale taken in late 1980.The first is of the ”other” Swift WK214 which was hidden around the back of the old mill.
The second is a shot of the famous pond with Balliol WG229 emerging from the depths.




By: Mark12 - 2nd March 2008 at 14:19
Might be your pic (i like it and cant always remember where i get them from, but it had no description):diablo:
There was a few other pics where i found it. Some showed other AC parts strewn across a field, sorry MUSEUM.
I have some type of soviet AC standing in a field too (found same place i think), I will try to find it and post it.
Mondariz,
Forum etiquette.
May I suggest that if you cannot remember where you got got them from, you don’t post them.
Mark
By: Mondariz - 2nd March 2008 at 14:13
Might be your pic (i like it and cant always remember where i get them from, but it had no description):diablo:
There was a few other pics where i found it. Some showed other AC parts strewn across a field, sorry MUSEUM.
I have some type of soviet AC standing in a field too (found same place i think), I will try to find it and post it.
By: APC104 - 2nd March 2008 at 13:52
Unknown location in China.
Chinese Air Museum outside. Beijing. Another one of those when is a museum a scrapyard type scenarios with the outside exhibits and the local weather.
That might actually be my photo! 😉
By: Mondariz - 2nd March 2008 at 06:33
Unknown location in China.

By: avion ancien - 1st March 2008 at 21:47
Whilst on the subject of airport firemen’s playthings, does anyone have a photo of the Viking that used to get the fire and foam treatment at Gatwick in the late 1960s? I don’t have my notes to hand at present so I can’t say what it’s identity was. I’ll check and post again tomorrow – unless someone comes up with the info in the meantime.
Having found the notes, and blown the dust off them, it’s apparent that my notemaking of nearly forty years ago left much to be desired! However having identified the likely candidates and undertaken a modicum of cross referencing, I think that it must have been Viking 614 G-AHPE. Does anyone have a photo of that aeroplane, ideally in her days as the firemen’s plaything at Gatwick?
By: Mark12 - 1st March 2008 at 18:15
Fireman’s play things.
Even in 1960, when I took this shot at a RN Chatham open day, it bought a tear to my eye.
Fire demonstration Seafire XV, SR602.
Mark

By: Tillerman - 1st March 2008 at 17:50
Talk about firemen’s playthings…. At Zestienhoven, near Rotterdam, they had a rather unique fire training hulk during the sixties: a Martin PBM5A Mariner of the Dutch Navy: http://aeroweb.brooklyn.cuny.edu/database/aircraft/getimage.htm?id=13223
One year ago I did put up a question on the Rotterdam Airport forum if someone could provide a picture, but no answer so far.
Tillerman.
By: avion ancien - 29th February 2008 at 23:46
Gatwick Viking
Whilst on the subject of airport firemen’s playthings, does anyone have a photo of the Viking that used to get the fire and foam treatment at Gatwick in the late 1960s? I don’t have my notes to hand at present so I can’t say what it’s identity was. I’ll check and post again tomorrow – unless someone comes up with the info in the meantime.
By: Arabella-Cox - 29th February 2008 at 23:35
Two out of three ain’t bad! Just the when, then!
Sorry, i think it was mid’ 1972. Given to airport fire service i believe.
Some photo’s Here.
By: avion ancien - 29th February 2008 at 22:05
Indeed ex-Fairey Surveys C-47A G-AHCT
.
Two out of three ain’t bad! Just the when, then!
By: Arabella-Cox - 29th February 2008 at 21:25
Avion – it looks very much like the Dakota that was on the fire dump at Manchester airport.
Indeed ex-Fairey Surveys C-47A G-AHCT
.
By: David Burke - 29th February 2008 at 20:11
Avion – it looks very much like the Dakota that was on the fire dump at Manchester airport.
By: avion ancien - 29th February 2008 at 19:07
Here’s another scrap aircraft from years back…
David
Identity, location, date – please!
By: Arabella-Cox - 29th February 2008 at 17:46
Thanks for posting your pics, dsinnett. It’s always nostalgic to see pictures of the Clayton Vale yard, especially as I never remembered to take a camera with me on my occasional visits.
I remember the council estate behind the yard – it makes me think every local kid must have had his scrap souvenir. I wonder if any of it is still around?
Here’s a small item that survives. An early Shackleton panel. Me and my pal literally dug it out of the ground. I think we paid them £2 for it. It was in a pretty poor state, and the starboard half had been torn off. British Aerospace kindly made us a replacement panel (the whole thing comes in two halves) so it was just a matter of bolting it back together.