May 22, 2014 at 4:52 pm
If not for Queen & Country then, for country, your family and yourself. The ‘fruitcakes’, ‘closet rascists’ and ‘loonies’ deserve to have a go at running the country – ultimately.
They cannot be worse than the bunch now running things with Red Ed waiting in the wings. I can’t wait to hear Dave C’s comments when Nigel romps home. Word has it that Nigel even likes grammar schools ! That’s a bit radical.
By: charliehunt - 6th June 2014 at 19:56
I’d like to believe they’ve had their fun and that the next few months might return them to some form of sanity. If not they will certainly forfeit any likelihood of ever achieving their main aim.
By: Moggy C - 6th June 2014 at 19:29
No. It’s the way to make sure Miliband gets in and we have no referendum.
How stupid can UKIP voters be?
Moggy
By: John Green - 6th June 2014 at 18:18
Re 190
Quite right, Moggy old chap ! A vote for UKIP is a vote for jumping the sinking EU ship.
By: charliehunt - 6th June 2014 at 12:48
26% from a standing start is pretty respectable. However, it is noticeable that Labour also sank pretty low in a seat they should be targeting, and one which they held relatively recently. Interesting times.
In percentage terms it reflects their showing in the EU elections so hardly a standing start. But it’s probably fair to suggest that although only half the electorate voted every UKIP supporter will have voted so the abstainees are likely to be Tories who believed the result was a foregone conclusion and Labour who knew they hadn’t a hope along with Libs likewise. 10,000 votes is not going to make much difference and Newark was nice and close to the EU election whereas there is a lot of time to lose momentum before next May.
By: Moggy C - 6th June 2014 at 12:39
Maybe the good people of Newark just want an EU referendum and are intelligent enough to know the only way they’ll get one?
By: John Green - 6th June 2014 at 11:46
There should be a recount.
That Newark, that sublime hotbed of rebellious instinct should speak for the Tories is contrary to natural law.
By: Bruce - 6th June 2014 at 09:34
Not even a tremor – 45% to Tories and 26% to UKIP. Libs sunk without trace!!
26% from a standing start is pretty respectable. However, it is noticeable that Labour also sank pretty low in a seat they should be targeting, and one which they held relatively recently. Interesting times.
By: Moggy C - 6th June 2014 at 07:47
I was just wondering , because doesn’t a party need a certain number of seats to win the majority?
In the event of a very fractured result split between many small parties it is not unknown for there to be a minority government seeking support from others on a bill by bill basis.
This generally results in a pretty moribund government. You can take your own view on whether this is a good or bad thing.
Moggy
By: charliehunt - 6th June 2014 at 05:19
Not even a tremor – 45% to Tories and 26% to UKIP. Libs sunk without trace!!
By: TwinOtter23 - 6th June 2014 at 04:44
Good to hear the news from Newark – still no earthquake!
By: MattCooke - 5th June 2014 at 23:28
The question is so utterly unlikely but playing along with your game, unless you are suggesting that each of the other candidates received exactly the same votes in which case the election would be rerun, then a majority of one would suffice. And unless the votes were divisible by 6 one of the candidates would have a majority.
Haha I’m totally aware it’d never happen, I was just wondering , because doesn’t a party need a certain number of seats to win the majority? Which is why the torys asked the Lib Dems to form a coalition to make up the seats because there was a hung parliament at the last election?
By: charliehunt - 5th June 2014 at 22:18
A Europe united in peace as a democratic group of independent nations? Yes. But not as a group of independent nations owing some sort of allegiance to a bunch of unelected autocrats in Brussels. Absolutely not.
By: j_jza80 - 5th June 2014 at 21:48
This image made me ponder for a while 
Should we be celebrating a united Europe on this D-day anniversary?
Sadly, I can’t help but think that despite the sacrifices of many lives, we have been dominated by an undemocratic regime from the continent.
Perhaps instead of trying to force the peoples of Europe together, we should celebrate our differences? They make us all unique.
By: John Green - 5th June 2014 at 21:10
Re 180
Blimey, never thought I’d read of someone actually supporting the eurozone. You must have investments ! The advice from the shamans would be to sell, sell, sell.
By: TwinOtter23 - 5th June 2014 at 20:50
With respect to #175, which railway station.
Likewise re Civil War references it might take RH and Nige three tries to get a result!
Still back to the free movement of the masses, out here in Greece doing my bit to support the Eurozone! 😀
By: silver fox - 5th June 2014 at 20:05
A few comments on the importance of the Newark by-election, clearly dear Nige isn’t feeling any pressure, looks more like feeling his oats out in Malta, according to press reports.
By: charliehunt - 5th June 2014 at 19:30
The question is so utterly unlikely but playing along with your game, unless you are suggesting that each of the other candidates received exactly the same votes in which case the election would be rerun, then a majority of one would suffice. And unless the votes were divisible by 6 one of the candidates would have a majority.
By: trumper - 5th June 2014 at 18:57
Interesting and i have no idea. I doubt it would happen but it does make for an interesting thought 🙂 I wonder if there is something written ,maybe the Queen qwould have to step in.
By: MattCooke - 5th June 2014 at 18:30
Unfortunately or fortunately in 5 years time not alot would’ve changed.Still be 2 main parties lying,fiddling and screwing us all.
What would happen in a circumstance where both Labour and Conservative receive 0 votes, and votes are split almost evenly among 6 or so other parties? There would be no majority so what would happen, assuming no coalitions were proposed?
By: John Green - 5th June 2014 at 18:26
Re 173
Thank you for this interesting question. Few know the location of this famed temple dedicated, in part at least, to Mammon. The answer to your interesting question would, normally, be Newark. But, as I’m sure you know things are seldom that easy.
The origins and location of Newark racecourse are obscured by the passage of time and the distortion of legend. Not so much a case of “all will be revealed” as “nothing will be revealed”. In your case as “a seeker after truth” , would you prefer Newark railway station?
I have it on shamanic authority that proof can be delivered.
Bless you and go in peace.