dark light

matt

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,711 through 1,725 (of 3,292 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: IAF – Aug 2006 cont'd #2576734
    matt
    Participant

    How is the Rafale in a different class than the F18 E/F? If you can have Raffles for MRCA, surely F18 e/f can also contend. If they want to stay lighter, MiG 35 and Gripen are the only options and for obvious reasons, the MiG 35 is the best bet.

    Only problem with 250 MKI is that it is 2 seater a/c. Translates into problems in terms of pilots available ( i believe they have 2 sets per a/c, Harry or George or Nick could confirm this). A Single seat version (similar to Su 35BM) ought to make this more practical.

    REgards,
    USS.

    Thats what i want to see more single seat aircraft in the IAF so that we dont have such dramas about pilots etc!

    With the avionics and weapons management systems on the EFA they have managed to overcome the need for a WSO it can be done on the Su-30Mki also! how much further would it go faster would it fly if it didnt have to carry the life systems for two men! and only had to worry about the one!

    in reply to: IAF – Aug 2006 cont'd #2576934
    matt
    Participant

    I agree with the above msg, i would have kept the lines on the Su-30mki open till 2017 and gone in for upgrades. Even something similar to the Eurofighter avionics suite so there is no need for a WSO in future versions of the Su-30Mki’s india orders.

    in reply to: What this Boeing? #2581451
    matt
    Participant

    can we not just call it THE NEW SUPER GUPPY?

    in reply to: BOX WING TANKERS #2581869
    matt
    Participant

    Hmm that is a shame, the box wing would make it possible to have lighter structures.

    Thanks for the link bring it on.

    How does the box wing figure in terms of manouvrebility etc

    in reply to: More Su-30MK orders? #2581932
    matt
    Participant

    Well i once went into this local “Indian” restaraunt and found on the menu “NESHELI MURGHI” which is DRUNKEN CHICKEN to people who arent up with the language.

    Now having witnessed a Drunken Chicken Curry i dont see any problem in having a STEALTHY CHICKEN.

    in reply to: IAF – Aug 2006 cont'd #2582000
    matt
    Participant

    sounds like they are lining up to give the US an advantage!

    hmm damn!

    in reply to: Indian Missile news and speculations #1809459
    matt
    Participant

    I just can not wait for the coming wave of anti anti anti ballistic missile interceptors. 😀

    Naah that will never ever happen! all the engineers on the projects will go mad trying to decide the nomencleture of a Anti-Anti-Anti Ballistic missile interceptor, before they get to the produtiong phase.

    in reply to: Indian navy – news & discussion #2043423
    matt
    Participant

    It is a mistake to underestimate China. China’s shipbuilding industry dominates the world. India’s shipbuilding industry is miniscule in comparison.

    We all know that India has been talking very loudly about an indigenous carrier for years, but we wont see the ADS at sea for perhaps another decade.

    On the other hand, China doesn’t seem to announce its military shipbuilding intentions until the ship is actually fitting out. I don’t know what is planned for Varyag, but it is easy to believe that if the Chinese leadership want aircraft carriers, the Chinese leadership will get aircraft carriers.

    If the chinese military machine is as good as its civilian counterpart then the world is safe.

    in reply to: IAF – Aug 2006 cont'd #2584377
    matt
    Participant

    What is the situation on the helmets? Have they shifted to Kevlar helmets?

    in reply to: Indian navy – news & discussion #2043492
    matt
    Participant

    why do you think they WILL induct the Backfire?

    in reply to: IAF – Aug 2006 cont'd #2584465
    matt
    Participant

    The IAF needs to get all there air defences networked and i think that is what the airticle is talking off, for true Network centric warfare the IAF IN and IA need to be linked and that is another ball game.

    It seems that with all the modernisation the Army is being neglected maybe the ground reality is different, but the IN is buying new ships and warfare systems and the IAF is buying new Aircraft. but the Army still doesnt have the Artilary it wanted or the Tanks (thanks to the Arjun fiasco) and is still waiting for better body protection gear.

    i am prob out dated in this opinion but would like to know either way.

    in reply to: Indian Missile news and speculations #1809599
    matt
    Participant

    sounds like bs, where did they get the 3.3 seconds stuff from?

    If SM-3 has succeeded in shooting down ballistic missiles that go mach15+, how can something that goes mach2.5-3.0 in the case of Russian AShM be harder than that.

    Ballistic missile trajectories normally dont change mid course, this isnt counting the new Anti-Anti-ballistic-missile warheards

    in reply to: IAF – Aug 2006 cont'd #2585092
    matt
    Participant

    Dhruvs Perform Daring Missions In Flood-Hit Areas

    (Source: Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd.; issued Aug. 17, 2006)

    The Advanced Light Helicopter (ALH) Dhruv, manufactured by Hindustan Aeronautics Limited, has once again become the saviour of several lives in the face of a natural calamity.

    Dhruvs, operated by the Indian Air Force (IAF) and ONGC, were instrumental in saving people from flood-affected areas in Gujarat, Maharashtra, Karnataka and Andhra Pradesh.

    In areas like Bhadrachallam, Rajahmundry in Andhra Pradesh and Nanded, Nagpur in Maharashtra, three Dhruv helicopters flew 60 hours in three days, distributing around 20 tons of food and water to people who were stranded.

    Around 320 people were rescued from floodwaters. This included seven people who were winched from the top of a stranded bus in Mahekar, close to Bidar.

    In another case, 262 people were evacuated from two marooned villages close to Nagpur. The helicopters also did low hovering over flooded areas and rescued lying casualties and those who took shelter over treetops.

    On its part, the ONGC operated one Dhruv copter for rescue operations in its Surat Hazira plant, apart from dropping food and water packages in Surat and surrounding areas.

    The copters carried out the operations in extremely testing conditions. Low-cloud ceiling, poor visibility, strong winds and rain made the mission more challenging.

    Wg Cdr C.D. Upadhyay, Chief Test Pilot, HAL, said that the latest operations proved the capabilities of ALH to carry out its mission in adverse climatic conditions. “We are proud that our machines played a key role in saving so many lives. We once again salute the spirit of IAF and its boys,” Upadhyay said.

    -ends-

    in reply to: Indian Missile news and speculations #1809605
    matt
    Participant

    The integrated Guided Missile Development Programme was sanctioned to develop Prithvi, Agni (technology demonstrator), Trishul, Akash and Nag Missiles. All the missiles have been developed.

    – Prithvi-I for Army, and its variants P-II for Air Force and Dhanush for Indian Navy have since been productionized.

    – Agni, Technology Demonstrator project, has been successfully completed and A1 & A2, medium and intermediate range missiles derived from AGNI technologies are already under production.

    – Akash medium range surface-to-air missile and Nag, Third Generation Anti-Tank Missile, are entering user trials phase and are expected to be inducted after that.

    – Trishul, a short range surface-to-air missile has also been developed as a technology demonstrator.

    This information was given by the Defence Minister Shri Pranab Mukherjee in a written reply to Shri Asaduddin Owaisi in Lok Sabha today.

    in reply to: 72 Typhoons to Saudi-Arabia – confirmed by Saudi MoD #2585182
    matt
    Participant

    From what i know from ex RAF chaps serving in Saudi nearly all of there things were done by ex pats.

    I was also told by my lecturers how the Saud kids would come to the uk and wouldnt like to be told they were wrong or did bad and threw tantrums regularly if they didnt do so well. The exams were too hard for their poor rich heads aparently. Maybe they mistook Engineering for Computing or something.

    Anyways didnt the Saudis buy a shed load of Tornados during the 90s?

Viewing 15 posts - 1,711 through 1,725 (of 3,292 total)