I seriously am starting to think that even a light F/A-18 will be of no use to India against a chinese fleet of Su’s J-10s etc. I have faith in the IAF and the capability of their machines but with the numbers that China have were gone for if one of our main aircraft cant keep up with incoming chinese Su’s and J-10s and the Indian Sus cant be every where at once.
As for strike and taking into account what India has to face in the Future (and lets face it at the moment the PAF mean nothing for the IAF but they are getting newer and newer technology and they will not always be in such financial difficulties).
India should invest in UCAVS and even work with the israelis if needs be. Buy Global hawks and predators fit them up to carry missiles rockets etc.
That isn’t going to help a slow airframe chase anything down or even cut it off on an intercept. Example: An F-14, F-15, Big SU, can cut things off or refuse to engage most aircraft. If an F-16 refuses to engage an F-18E/F thats all there is too it.
From what you have said it seems that for India the best Idea would be to get the AESA radars and fit it into the later batches of the Su-30MKi’s
Or have the EA-18 prowler varient of the F/A-18 as it doesnt seem to be good for much.
Or how would 50 F/A-18s with AESA, each embeded within a Wing of Mig-35’s/Su-30Mki’s work? as a force multiplier.
The 3D challenge for Advanced Aerospace Composites
The performance and productivity achievable with 3D composite reinforcement technologies are driving demand and stimulating development in the aerospace sector, and a UK team has been discovering the advances being made in the US.
A team from UK organisations was brought together to undertake a Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) Global Watch Mission to the USA to find out about the modelling and manufacturing developments that are getting advances off the ground in the US.
High-performance composites are already a mainstay of aerospace components and secondary structures, but over the next decade the industry intends to use even more advanced techniques for primary structures such as fuselages and wings. The challenge for suppliers is to develop 3D weaving, knitting and braiding processes capable of delivering the complex shapes and cost reductions required. These techniques give control over fibre orientation and architecture to produce fully integrated 3D net-shaped preforms with variable properties, and when fully automated they can dramatically improve efficiency.
‘Recent manufacturing advances have made 3D composite structures much more of a commercial possibility, but manufacturers now need to know much more about the performance and tolerances required by end users,’ says Sue Panteny, representing the National Composites Network, which co-ordinated the mission. During visits to 3D composite reinforcement manufacturers and research organisations in New England, Pennsylvania, Delaware and North Carolina, the team of UK experts asked questions about novel machinery and modelling tools which are beginning to provide some key answers for suppliers and users.
According to the team, representing Airbus, Carr Reinforcements, Nottingham University, Parkhill Textiles, Rolls-Royce, Saint-Gobain Technical Fabrics, Bombardier Aerospace UK and the University of Ulster, technical capabilities might be similar on both sides of the Atlantic but exploitation experience is much greater in the US. ‘We were shown a near net-shaped preform for an engine fan blade which demonstrates that they are starting to develop real components and the real potential of 3D weaving for aerospace and beyond,’ says Professor Robert McIlhagger of the University of Ulster and Bombardier Aerospace UK.
——————————————————————————–
Next-generation weaving at Bally Ribbon Mills
This Pennsylvanian ribbonmaker has diversified into the woven carbon fibre market on a large scale with great determination and significant funding. The five-axis weaving machine it has developed was one of the highlights of the mission. ‘For normal weaving of a flat – so-called 2D – piece of fabric you have warp and weft threads at right angles,’ says Professor Robert McIlhagger. ‘With a five-axis machine you have the warp and weft – x and y – directions but also a z direction which gives a consolidated woven structure with the ability to weave fibres into the structure at 45 degrees, taking weaving to the next level.’
Predictive modelling at 3Tex
Spun out of North Carolina State University to commercialise technologies developed in the Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering department, 3 Tex demonstrated an impressive array of expertise. ‘3 Tex has a considerable academic capability which is being used to advance its understanding of the influence of reinforcement architectures on component structures,’ says Lee Bateup of Saint-Gobain Technical Fabrics. ‘Through modelling it is gaining knowledge that will enable more precise specification and more appropriate products.’ 3 Tex has also developed 3D weaving and braiding techniques, the latter offering greater flexibility and a smart way of making hollow parts. According to Professor Andrew Long, of Nottingham University, this combination of capabilities puts the company in a strong position: ‘It is able to look at a component, talk about requirements and, as it has a strong interest in two alternative processes, recommend the right one.’
——————————————————————————–
The team gained an insight into where 3D composites might go in the future at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and the University of Delaware. The former has grown carbon nanotubes onto fibres which, if reproduced on layers of carbon fibre fabric, could make an innovative 3D material in a very usable form. Delaware, meanwhile, is investigating how the blast-resistance of some 3D woven materials could be used in military applications such as ballistics, hard armour and vehicle structures.
Five reasons to use 3D fabrics
The advantages of using complex preform shapes made using 3D weaving processes rather than fabrics made by traditional fabric cutting and layering fabrication methods include:
Higher fibre volume and strength
Greater impact tolerance
Option of using different fibre types in the weaving process
Lower susceptibility to delamination
Lower labour costs
The image shows 3-D weaving, courtesy of 3TEX Inc. This article originally appeared in Global Watch, the monthly magazine of the DTI Global Watch Service. For further information on Global Watch please follow the link below; a link to the full report is also provided.
But what makes you think that the US will get the contracts for the construction of these plants ? For one india is allredy working on its own indegenously designed plant and even if it looks outside the country what does the US have to offer interms of modern nuclear power plants??
The fast breeder reactor program is great and very impressive but until that is proven india will still need fuel and plants. And recalling the US’s reaction recently when India bought emergency supplies of nuke fuel from Russia makes me think theres something in the nuke deal which may give US companies around the world better chances.
The contract might not have said, you must buy American but it might have stipulated certain things that only US companies around the world may offer.
Plus certain technology i think only the US posseses
For some aircrafts, no amount of bribes and kickbacks are ever going to work . And after all, isn’t the nuke deal, one huge bribe ? 🙂
I think the nuke deal is more of a stand alone thing, the amount of money american companies will make through the deal alone will probably out weight anything the IAF can buy.
Indias energy needs are huge and even with the governments hard work in getting 20% of its electricity through other natural resources india will still need nuke plants.
Electronic warfare
Didnt, the IAF posses bears that had electronic warfare capabilities?
i thought that they also had some learjets with these capabilities?
maybe i am geting muddled up with another airforce
How can any aerodynamic concept be “out of date” what a silly notion!
I dont see why they dont turn the Berkut and Mig 1.4 into flying aircraft! leave the FSW of the Berkut, with techonologies now you could probably make those thick composite wings a lot cheaper then before with better material and do it faster!
I think i saw him!
:S
i cant see anything , could some one highlight it for me please?
Does anyone know if the KS-172 can be launched from tubes vertically up? that 400km range is very impressive would make a good ABM missile wouldnt it? a second tier to Trishul
IR, The jags have Aim 9L on them. Well the RAF ones do
peter warral is taht the guy who payed for his own obe or something?
thats what they said about vietnam iam sure, and the War in afghanistan is really over as well.