dark light

matt

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 2,071 through 2,085 (of 3,292 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Mig-31 versus F-22 #2637214
    matt
    Participant

    F-16MATV video, can you guys tell me where i can get hold of this video?

    in reply to: INS Vikramaditya (ex-Gorshkov) #2046241
    matt
    Participant

    aah cool, I know they helped in the LCA wing design as well but didnt know that they had started to help again.

    Any news about TV for the NLCA ?

    in reply to: INS Vikramaditya (ex-Gorshkov) #2046260
    matt
    Participant

    The Grosh will have ski for T/O but landing would be Barrier Assisted One (STOBAR), So i would think that its in the landing part where they would require training/assistance.

    Also US is assisting India for the N-LCA development but its part of the growing Indo-US defence co-op

    more info on the NLCA assisitance please 🙂

    in reply to: INS Vikramaditya (ex-Gorshkov) #2046263
    matt
    Participant

    May be lure them but F/A 18 hornets?

    The Navy has the aircraft it has, it cant divert from the current Mig-29K due to the tie in with the Vikramaditya contract. As for the IAF well i am sure they will ,by the end of the MRCA requasition completion , have flown on both the “Block 70” F-16’s and the F/A-18

    in reply to: What the? New US stealth plane? #2637864
    matt
    Participant

    erm movie trailor looks daft, biels hot though.

    matt
    Participant

    Multi polar world here we cometh

    in reply to: MiG-29K and related #2638275
    matt
    Participant

    what is normal take of weight?

    in reply to: Word about new Chinese airlifter #2638295
    matt
    Participant

    Wouldn’t a cooperation with a foreign manufacturer be the smarter way to go – perhaps with Boeing or with a Russian design bureau? Maybe even cooperation with the Europeans on the A400… Its just that going it alone seems risky and expensive – especially as they’re going to have to go for a foreign powerplant anyway. Or maybe its just another way for China to subsidise its industry with government funds.

    hmm maybe the russian 214 transport

    in reply to: IAF- news & discussions- MAY 2005 #2638369
    matt
    Participant

    WTF! This missle is a monster! It’ll do the entire hilltop – bunker busters are nothing compared to this! :diablo:

    Well they use the popeye (modified) aparently as a nuke delivery missile from subs http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/world/israel/dolphin.htm

    in reply to: Gripen crashes #2638388
    matt
    Participant

    hmm this sounds pretty strange for such a new(ish) plane.

    in reply to: Word about new Chinese airlifter #2638391
    matt
    Participant

    Sounds like the a400 is exactly what they need.

    They could always buy it off us 🙂

    in reply to: Word about new Chinese airlifter #2638414
    matt
    Participant

    No chance to get into the A400M now, i mean at the early stages, maybe as materials suplier or parts supplier but other then that they can do nothing more

    in reply to: IAF- news & discussions- MAY 2005 #2638420
    matt
    Participant

    what did they alter to make it IAF acceptable that made it fail tests?

    in reply to: Southend – Including Eurofighter in Action #2638710
    matt
    Participant

    great shots!

    in reply to: Typhoon, this sunday as Southend #2638957
    matt
    Participant

    aah well mine are never good 🙂

Viewing 15 posts - 2,071 through 2,085 (of 3,292 total)