dark light

matt

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 2,191 through 2,205 (of 3,292 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: AntiMatter: How it matters to the Future Aviation #2646933
    matt
    Participant

    Or even less, depending on what you want to do with it.

    Nanotech is too widely thrown about. It could be used withing 2 years just depends on the application i suppose.

    in reply to: Aero India Thread #2649692
    matt
    Participant

    Jeez! He is doing everybody a favour by showing some previews of pics he intends to release anyway. These are his own photographs, not something taken from some source on the internet or something like that. And he can do what he likes with it. If you don’t like it with the blocks, don’t see it just now and wait for the full release.

    It is not nice to demand what is not yours!

    :rolleyes:

    Erm what is the point in putting this up when you cant see them anyway ? waste of forum space!

    in reply to: India's Submarine Launched Cruise Missile Programme #2050076
    matt
    Participant

    Yes I know its Old , but India’s SLCM/SLBM programme has hardly been discussed, Lots of Activity in this sphere but little media attention. Specially after the recent simulated underwater launch of Dhanush , also Recently In an interview to Force the WNC chief said that DRDO was looking at the 1500 Km range Cruise Missile .

    Also I would like to know how good is the Tomahawk Bolck 3

    but the programs and names are so confusing. i thought dhanush was brahmos and sagrika was just launcher

    in reply to: India's Submarine Launched Cruise Missile Programme #2050080
    matt
    Participant

    This is a very very old old report .. and i dont see why you have highlighted things.

    in reply to: Indian AF – News & Discussions – Jan 2005 #2663558
    matt
    Participant

    I object! MUCH ADMIRED ? i am insulted by that globally sweeping comment!

    hmm strange though that they wouldnt put it in the show if they wanted to sell it to India.

    hmm on second thought they might have ment to say “Much-mired”

    in reply to: Lockheed Team Wins Presidential Chopper #2663607
    matt
    Participant

    Everyone knew this would be the outcome, the EH101 is just that much more survivable then the competitor and it has been proven.

    score one for technological advancement.

    in reply to: Replacement for the SR71 #2607307
    matt
    Participant

    i thought they were going to use a concept similar to helios.

    in reply to: Goodbye Catty(F-14) #2607311
    matt
    Participant

    maybe the US could give iran the Tomcats as a gesture of good will ?

    in reply to: Bazan BSAC 220 and 200 "pocket carriers" anyone have pics? #2061690
    matt
    Participant

    21 mig-29k’s ? thats pretty good! how can it be a pocket AC ?

    in reply to: IAF MCRA : Mirage-2005/9 vs MIG-29SMT #2614117
    matt
    Participant

    The su-30 airframe comes directly from the 70’s su-27UB airframe (crappy according to you ?)… that is what I meant. But you get it anyway.

    80’s

    in reply to: Brahmos #2050685
    matt
    Participant

    A video of Brahmos being test fired is attached.

    Dunke

    in reply to: IAF MCRA : Mirage-2005/9 vs MIG-29SMT #2614129
    matt
    Participant

    Well the su-30 and mig-29 are also 70’s airframes 😉

    First flights

    YF-16 : february 1974
    Su-27 : May 1977
    Mig-29 : october 1977
    Mirage 2000 : March 1978
    Gripen : December 1988

    Wow so you too can google for aircraft dates. Please tell us all when the Airframe for the Su-30 came into service, and when the Airframe for the Gripen came into full op service.. I could also find this out but since you love to google.

    also winking is a bad habit, and often taken as a flirt, if you mean it in those terms please carry on. 😉

    in reply to: IAF MCRA : Mirage-2005/9 vs MIG-29SMT #2615753
    matt
    Participant

    I think that India should save up build some more su-30s and spend the money on development of the MCA and PAK-FA 5th gen fighters.

    The LCA will come online in 2008 to retire those MiGs and one more assembly line for the MKI will be desired

    That makes soo much more sence then wasting money on Mirage 2000’s and MRCA’s we are going to end up like Italy before world war 2 with the best Aircraft and find out when war actually does come years down the line that we are obsolete and have no money to spend on new aircraft because we bought crappy 1970’s airframes.

    in reply to: IAF MCRA : Mirage-2005/9 vs MIG-29SMT #2615869
    matt
    Participant

    Austin as much as i would like to agreee with you and trumpet the excellent abilities of the mirage i cannot. India defence is also a very questionable source they have come up with wonderful pipe dreams in the past only matched by BR’s dogged optimism.

    It is designed as a bomber! and will serve stratigic command well incase Agni, Prithvi fail or are cancelled (highly unlikely). But as an MRCA the Mirage is not what the IAF should go into the new century with. The italian airforce before world war two spend loads of money on aircraft that were considered some of the best in the world, only to find when war started that their prized aircraft were not upto the task. India does not need the Mirage now! its a waste of space for anything other then deep penetration and N srike. even then it is hard to justify it when India should be working on ICBMS.

    in reply to: MC-130 writeoff in Iraq – WTF, how stupid can one get #2615932
    matt
    Participant

    Sorry Matt

    I used to work for a flight briefing service and putting temp notams onto charts was a pain in the butt.

    A225HVY

    yup! lol that why we ignored most of them and just let ATC sort it.

Viewing 15 posts - 2,191 through 2,205 (of 3,292 total)