F-18 G load is limited by software. I believe the F-35C is also limited by software to roughly 7.5 G’s, and 7 G for the F-35B. For the F-18 and the -C, the limits are meant to extend airframe life. Not sure why the -B is only 7G.
It is limited by software because the structure can not cope with higher loadings without having a negative effect on the total life of the airframe, you take that software limit off on the F18 and you will see a increase in maintenance or decrease in total life and probably all sorts of fatigue issues.
does anyone really know what counts these day? when was the last semi great or great airwar faught?
is it speed, agility, avionics or the number of munitions you can carry?
it checks the composite panel for flaws. if there are any flaws, any portions where the bond between the layers of composite fabric hasn’t fully cured, which might lead to disbonding, such a water jet will find it.
It can give you a rough idea about the density of the material your scanning and if you have done a lot of work previously it might therefor be able to tell you if your panel has been fully cured or not, how ever with a squirter system there are many issues that arise and a lot of noise is generated.
If anything the machine is probably just used to check for hairnets, rulers, backers toenails, bits of gloves used during lay up etc and off course to see if there are a high degrees of anomalies like some form of porosity.
I was watching this NGC feature on Tejas.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4hvoZ0wfQ6Q
At 3:20 in the video, after baking, the composite panel is treated intensively with water jets. Does anyone have an idea on what that treatment is for ?
They have a clip of a water jet through thickness NDT machine, it is not a treatment but a inspection method.
Some amazing photos in the links above, jaguars look very business like
IAF never had bears, therefore, they can’t still have bears.
I can tell your bored….
So oki does India have Tu-142’s or variants their off?
Do the IAF still have the Bears? are they not part of the strategic air force? would make perfect sense for an aircraft that size to be part of strategic command if they still have some life on them that is. Would be perfect launch platforms for Shourya missiles extend the range significantly.
Neither is cancelled. Nag just had a successful user trial.
I thought they were having issues with the milimetric wave radar for the Nag…and i thought that the Indian Army had to buy alternative missiles instead of the nag..
Oki so have I confused nag and trishul?
This is amazing! how is it possible that ISRO had a stock of Cryogenic rockets they knew what the issue was with the rockets and still carried on trying to launch satellites above the spec limit of the supplier until they are in a situation where they delay satellites that are important for national security???
maybe the issue with the cryogenic rockets was not their fault but they must have known stocks of the rockets was going down….
there has to be a lot more behind this then the reports have mentioned over the years.
Work on the first 3 points…point 4 cannot be done. That ship sailed a long time back.
Why do you say point 4 cannot be done? Surely the point is that it has to be done? I am not saying head on, or matching numbers but some assymetric form and I would not have a clue what that would involve..
I thought helina was cancelled because they had problems with the seeker head, or was that Nag?
Any ICMB..India makes will be just for show. India has neither the economy or the will to maintain a significant amount of ICMB’s which could be a deciding factor in any disagreement with the US.
There is no unlimited amount of money in India. Make the Agni 5..induct it and move on to something else necessary.
So once you make the Agni 5, what would you do?
Would you carry on working on ABM,
Would you work on some Anti Submarine System
Would you work on a Chinese Still ASBM?
Would you work on a way to nullifiy the 2nd artillery brigade?
It gives India more voice internationally. Ideally we should have mobile canisterised ICBMs & Submarine Launched IRBMs, no country in the world should be outside our missile range, friend or foe. It will give you respect among friends and fear among enemies.
😉
I am not so sure that ICBM’s are needed and secondly apart from the local issues for which India will soon have a solution India does not have many international issues it has many more internal issues which need to be sorted if it is to carry on growing and prospering.
I do agree with the sub launched IRBM’s though as the land based ones are susceptible to espionage and other issues.
F-35B (VTOL? I get confused old age) have begun on USS Sea Wasp, some really good videos have been released on youtube.
Can the Shourya be launched from an aircraft?