dark light

matt

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 3,001 through 3,015 (of 3,292 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Indian Military News and dicussion #2679658
    matt
    Participant

    Does the EWS news mean that India will turn some of the N-LCA to specialist EWS machines similar to those in the US inventory?:D

    in reply to: J-10 Comming Soon, 4 squadrons by 2k5 #2679833
    matt
    Participant

    not sure but i dont think the F/A-22 will be ordered in large numbers just too costly….

    in reply to: Ho. Ly. Crap. #2679862
    matt
    Participant

    Originally posted by plawolf
    nice! but one obvious problem i see is where and how do u keep the ammo? the 1mpm fire rate would not be worth much if u have to reload every 0.0001 seconds.

    “They would be decent for anti-missle work, ala CIWS. I wonder if they’ve thought of trying them on MBTs against ATGMs.”

    why stop there? im sure it would put systems like the goalkeeper to shame if they can sustain teh fire rate and get some accuaracy on it. 😀

    it doesnt fire one million bullets thats just a could of how much it can fire if needed with a 36 barrel configuration. the time for every reload would be dependent on the customer specification read the site.

    it would be highly accurate again read the site. down load the vids.

    in reply to: ¡iPIC¡jNew Chinese J10B(twin seats) #2679865
    matt
    Participant

    Originally posted by mavaustin
    both the diagrams are completely diff, the intakes, the tail end, wings, you name…….

    Erez, I hope you would rest ypur case now and stop shouting phosotshoped Levi pictures.

    Who did you do consulting work for? :confused:

    in reply to: Ho. Ly. Crap. #2680009
    matt
    Participant

    yeah true point accepted but i dont know i just got nervous.. :S ..

    It would be good for infantary i guess.

    I wonder how they hope to replace the land mines with their system, still going through the website, not seen how they are going to make land mines redundent.

    some details about it, i guess the system would be connected to sensors on the ground.

    Where have Metal Storm prototypes been fired? In the US?

    On July 19 and 20, 2000 the company successfully completed its first major test firings on US soil at the Blossom Point Range outside Washington DC. These demonstrations were conducted with the cooperation of Australia’s Defence Science and Technology Organisation, which is the defence research and development arm of the Australian Department of Defence.

    Attending the demonstrations were senior personnel from the US Department of Defense, and the US Armed Services, who witnessed the capabilities of Metal Storm technology, demonstrated by three different prototypes:

    A six barrel 9mm system with an electronically variable firing rate as high as 240,000 rounds per minute. This system is a smaller version of a 36 barrel prototype which has earlier fired a burst of 180 rounds at a rate exceeding one million rounds per minute.

    A 40mm testbed which fires stacked grenades at rates as high as 20,000 rpm per barrel, being developed as an area-denial system to replace anti-personnel land mines as well as a range of other strategic military and civil applications.

    A totally electronic specialist police and military personalised handgun, being developed to also incorporate a less-than-lethal function.

    There is increased safety with these weapons because their all-electronic features will allow only authorised users with the correct microchip to use them.

    in reply to: Ho. Ly. Crap. #2680018
    matt
    Participant

    I think they have a great product and are putting out feelers, theirs one point that just worries me about this system.

    Also Metal Storm is not just about firing bullets. First and foremost Metal Storm is an electronically controlled delivery system. One which can store and fire bullets, or grenades, and which can just as easily fire massed containers of fire retardant powder, or similarly, agricultural chemicals.

    the bit in bold is very worrisome.

    in reply to: Ho. Ly. Crap. #2680043
    matt
    Participant

    how many?:eek:

    in reply to: Ho. Ly. Crap. #2680058
    matt
    Participant

    SOC did u watch the UAV vid? they managed to save the water buffalo! SWEET! hmmm mind u no hamburger!

    2mile long swath of grenades.. lol! love that!

    in reply to: Ho. Ly. Crap. #2680092
    matt
    Participant

    Just finished watching the 36 barrel gun vid… HO.. LY…C!

    But i cant see how the 36 barrel, 10,0000 ;180 shot can be usefull.. maybe on ships ?

    in reply to: Iran earthquake help #2680126
    matt
    Participant

    any news on heating equipment? i have read any papers that mentions heating.. is that part of the tents?

    in reply to: Ho. Ly. Crap. #2680148
    matt
    Participant

    I read some time back one of the nice things about the electronic firing mechanism was reduction of recoil.. ( i am sorry i cant remember how it achieves this since if it explodes it recoils, in my book atleast.)

    in reply to: Ho. Ly. Crap. #2680160
    matt
    Participant

    Sweet.

    This would be usefull in helicopters and future UAVs. DERA was working on something using this tech before it was split up 🙁 .. it was in the Science part of the Sunday times in the 1990’s.. each week the Sunday times had a special science supplement (they stoped that for some stupid reason) and the SA-90 as the writer refered to it, was one of them. along with HALO and MAVS

    matt
    Participant

    TOMAHAWK

    CHARACTERISTICS (BGM-109)
    Length: 18 feet, three inches; with booster, 20 feet, six inches
    Diameter: 20.4 inches
    Wing Span: Eight feet, nine inches
    Weight: 2,650 pounds; 3,200 pounds with booster
    Speed: Subsonic – about 550 mph
    Range: Land attack, nuclear warhead, 1,350 nautical miles; land attack, conventional warhead, 600 nautical miles;
    anti-ship configuration, over 250 nautical miles
    Power Plant: Williams International F107-W-R-400 cruise
    turbo-fan engine; solid-fuel booster
    Warhead: Conventional – 1,000 pounds bullpup; Nuclear – W-80 conventional submunitions dispenser with combined effect bomblets
    Contractors: General Dynamics, Convai Division; McDonnell Douglas

    There is not really much difference in the warhead, and Yes the K.E. of the Brahmos would make up for the “explosive” energy.

    It depends on what the target material is, its ballistic limit and the energy abosorbtion of the material.

    Also iirc modern missiles, do not just attack random parts of ships or targets, they are specifically programmed to go into the weakest point on the ship something of note but i am not sure on this.

    As for the ships part, does a ship have to be sunk to make it useless? I dont think it does, but others might know better.

    I think if the Lakshya fusalage is made more rectangular, it would be possible to fit a more things with the same lenght and height

    Circular X-section fusalages are not the most efficient. Main reasons why most UAV’s have a rectangular X-section with rounded corners.

    matt
    Participant

    There are few limitations with Ramjets, the minimum velocity is only restricted by design. You do not need to be supersonic for a ramjet to work.

    Then you have the other limitation at high velocities,and you need to use a SCRAMJET.

    in reply to: J-10 Comming Soon, 4 squadrons by 2k5 #2680623
    matt
    Participant

    Originally posted by mavaustin
    no one is becoming nationalistic or defensive, the fact of the matter is that most indians here love to change the story and claim conspiracy theories when it comes to china or pakistan.

    by the way, i am not a pakistani nor a chinese. I have travelled to all three countries on business trip and my company extensively deals with defense related entities in these countries.

    Aviation is my interest since I have been a consultant in defense industry and that is why i take interest in Chinese, Pakistan and Indian AFs.

    India has come out with some good products, dont get me wrong, but the kinda arrogance you guys have irks most people on the internet and in day-to-day dealings.

    Its hard too hard for you guys to admit that China and Pakistan have progressed drastically in the field of military hardware and that is simply not acceptable to you guys, blame it on being the self proclaimed aryan race or the shock it gave you guys.

    It would be interesting to see where all three of you would be in next 5 years.

    :confused:

Viewing 15 posts - 3,001 through 3,015 (of 3,292 total)