It cannot be slip of tongue ,it poor piece of journalism , Aura and AMCA are two different projects
Cant remember where it was from, but the point about the AMCA being a UCAV came from the IAF officer not the journalist. So this time around it cant be down to poor journalism more likely slip of toungue.
Slip of tongue maybe, but iaf officer mentions in one liner that amca will be a ucav. Juicey just hope they get a decent project team.
Didn’t want to mention bomber forces, as those are separate. The Blackjack is here to stay for a long time too – what ever happened to resumed low rate production on the plane?
Also, what is the actual plan for the Su-25 platform? The UBM is a two seater? They want 2-seater CAS aircraft now?! I’d much rather see them produce something like the Su-25TM.
They would need some form of light aircraft similar to a MIG, aerodynagmically it can’t gave been bad and maybe just a case of putting the inwards of the 35 into a stealthy airframe. Over simplification I know but assume you get the intent.
Bsf have made official complaint about how they feel the alh is “useless” and imposes too many restrictions. Claims of poor readiness and serviceability have also been made.
Recently i have been arguing that the Eurocanards factored in RCS reduction measures at a relatively late stage in their design (perhaps during the late 80s/early 90s), when the value of American research and designs was apparent.
However, it occurs to me that European powers knew the value of RCS reduction in fighter designs long before that. I am aware of the German “glow worm project”, and I believe the RAF had access to the F117A before it was in the public sphere (?).
So when did the various European countries start to actively think about Stealth?
World war two. RAM was used or started to be used then, subs were the starting point. Material called dx-1 or something used in 60s on inside of aircraft to protect structure from microwaves.
Looks very much like an Aluminum honeycomb sandwich panel.
I doubt this is real part of wing structure.… usually that sort of thing goes into cabin interiors… 😀
Lol beat me..
looks like a ali honeycomb sandwich panel
Saying Indian uav will carry weapons is a bit of a mystic meg prediction. Indian army is asking for something like 1000 uav and ucavs of various sizes.
Why can’t this be made in india? Don’t taneja already make light aircraft?
They are talking of ABM capable of intercepting ICBM types target with corresponding re-entry speed.
PLAAF ASBM is best countered by Barak-NG or its longer range variant , India BM threat are not sea based or would spend most time of its trajectory out at sea but is land based from North which is China and West which is Pakistan.
Unlike US where Sea Based ABM system is critical for India it is of negligible value. Only land based system would be needed.
I can see your point, however being able to cover the Navy with a ABM on land before the missiles get any where near the Navy assets would not be a bad thing.
IN has real threads from Submarines in the Indian oceon which are probably a bigger issue than a ASBM. But a ace in the back pocket would be usefull.
Does seem childlike, but its probably not the big bosses he is most like fed information from his juniors who probably don’t want to own up to such simple or obvious oversight. If something has failed once before why not go to the supplier change spec and buy new shrouds?
India had mooted that it will have a 5000km (iirc) anti ballistic missile operational in around 2016.
This is desperately needed to counter plaaf anti ship ballistic missile and put up an umbrella for the Indian navy and its allies.
I like the plane it looks interesting and kind of new, what type of engines will this thing have? Are they turboprops?
Some real hogwash in that report. India is better served by non US weapons systems and by avoiding indirect subsidies to its neighbour.
India has been offered the AH-64D Block III Apache. The Block III offers a significant enhancement over earlier models, with new engines and a new rotor offering much better performance, especially in “high and hot” conditions as well as all digital systems, latest generation thermal sighting systems, upgraded Longbow radar and with the capability to remotely control UAV’s such as the Sky Warrior (US Army version of Predator) offering some interesting capabilities….
Is the full functionality being offered or is it a potential the aircraft can do? From my understanding nothing is published about what has been offered.
Hellfire costs a million pounds? 😮 I think you’ve made a mistake in your currency conversion. Divide that by about 20. The last production contract I’ve seen the figures for (2010) worked out at $68000 each.
well my mistake, dont know why i remember them being a million, were they ever a million pounds? Anyway do you really want to fire off a $68000 missile just so you could use your guns?
What version of the apache is being sold to India? is it the D?
Why do they need to buy them now? Technology on the apache hasnt really moved in years and its going to be another 5-10 years for new helicopters with stealth and all sorts to come into production can not they not upgrade or lengthen the life of the aircraft till then?