Sign I subscribe to dti and in the current issue Bill Sweetman makes it clear that the NG will survive with Swedish upgrades. But these will be older C/D models being brought to NG standard and not new airframes built from scratch.
I was not implying SAAB will not survive. Was just saying without India or Brazil we may not see Gripen NGs built from scratch, it will be an upgrade program.
And Arrows. I agree.
Its not merely a matter of surviving. The Brazilian prospects do not look good for SAAB, and the amount of fighters thailand can order is small. SAAB will continue to sell Gripen C/D in limited numbers the NG will be offered as an upgrade. But the real NG with airframe changes etc built from scratch may not happen if it fails in India and Brazil.
Again very limited numbers, without interest from Russia or India they are likely to struggle as well.
Dassault and EADS while having strong domestic market, you cannot say that the MRCA won’t make much of a difference.
With American firms you are right MRCA is but a drop in their fortunes. Boeing may still like to sell some Super Hornets before the line closes after USN orders.
True. May be my favorite will come out on top at the end. :diablo:
From bharat-rakshak
The report never implied having access to Top Secret files, it merely told what the IAF’s preference were, now that can be leaked by the IAF top brass or someone in the MoD and not necessarily need the documents,
Shiv Aroor said in his blog that all the contenders made the cut, IAF gave its preference with Typhoon and Rafale at the Top, SH in the Middle and Girpen, mIG and F 16 at the end.
Actually MIG and SAAB really need this contract. The Swedish government has pledge upgrade of their older Gripens to NG standard, but without either Brazil or India new built NGs may never come.
Same with MIG without the 35 it may die a slow death unless and untill it moves on from the Fulcrum platform. The saving grace will be IN and RuN orders as discussed in its thread.
It would be a big boost to EADS and Dassault as well.
Only the American firms may consider it a non-issue.
But IN did not send RFI to Sukhoi. It sent to EADS, LM, Boeing, Dassault, SAAB and MIG.
I will pack my bags and leave the country.
I agree but it depends on who your real allies can be. The Europeans and Russians don’t have any vested interests in the region so they are offering the fighters strings free to India. It may not be the case with another customer where they have foriegn policy interests.
Now America is torn between India and Pakistan, so their fighters will always come with strings when it comes to India. We must do whats best for us.
I was a strong advocate of American fighters during the Bush Admin, but things have changed since.
‘F414 looks like the best engine of the bunch.’
Well it may well be, but the Super Hornet did not perform that well with it may be because of Airframe design it may need more power to do well at hot and high conditions.
Shiv Aroor Clarifies the Times Now report.
More On TimesNOW’s Post On The MMRCA Selection
Spoke last evening to my friend and colleague on the beat Srinjoy Chowdhry about his report on Times NOW to get a better sense of what it was all about, and to clarify some of the stuff left tantalizingly unsaid. Srinjoy’s sources tell him the air force has based its trial evaluation report (submitted on August 1) on the overarching and unstated directive that it needs select a “modern western combat aircraft”. Read those first two words carefully, because they mean different things to different people in the air force, government and aircraft-manufacturer campaign offices. Anyway, by this frame of reference, according to Srinjoy’s sources, the MiG-35 is out because it isn’t western or modern — the IAF definitely doesn’t want to squander this opportunity buying more Russian hardware. The F-16 is out because it isn’t a modern platform with promising developing latitude ahead of it, they say. Interestingly, the F/A-18 is a “borderline case” according to his sources, who indicated to him that the Gripen is out because it’s too much like the Tejas, and buying the Gripen would be to preempt and make redundant the Tejas programme. Significantly, according to Srinjoy’s report, the IAF has cleared all six fighters for the next level, but clearly indicated its preference in an order of merit. In other words, a green light for the Rafale and Eurofighter, a yellow light for the F/A-18, and big red for the Gripen, F-16 and MiG-35. Also, it is almost certain that the final order for aircraft will be closer to 200 airplanes.
200+ Typhoon/Rafale 😮
At one point we will be seeing the F 35 rather than the PAKFA N in IN colours. You can save this.
I know and Boeing has offered a full 9G aircraft for India. The above views are the authors’ not mine.
The Strategic Bombers, Transport and Passenger Aircraft do not undergo the stress of a fighter jet and are sustainable through mid life upgrades for more decades than a fighter. You are comparing apples to Oranges.
MMRCA Update : F-18 Has Underpowered Engine, No One 100% Compliant, Says Report, Vendors Revise Their Prices !!
There was a reason for the delay of this report. Chindits is in possession of a RFP copy of the MMRCA.
As the technical evaluation report of the world’s largest defence deal – the medium multi-role combat role aircraft (MMRCA) gets completed by the Indian Air Force (IAF), before handing it to the Ministry of Defence (MoD), DNA has learnt from reliable sources, that there is a vast difference in the Air Staff Qualitative Requirement (ASQR) being fulfilled by the competitors, in engine requirements.
Of the 126, India will directly purchase 18 aircraft, of which 12 will be single-seater and six twin-seater aircraft. These aircraft will be located at three main operating bases and would be distributed among six independant flying squadrons, two per main operating base, with each squadron comprising 12 single-seat aircraft, while the remaining to be stored as reserves.
The six competitors are American Boeing F/A-18 Super Hornet IN, F-16IN Super Viper from the US Lockheed Martin, Gripen Next Generation (NG) from Sweden’s Saab, European consortium EADS’ Eurofighter Typhoon, French Rafale from Dassault Aviation and the Russian MiG-35.
According to the RFP, a copy of which is with DNA, the IAF states the following engine combat ASQRs:
“The MMRCA should have sea-level static thrust-to-weight ration of 1:1 or better with maximum afterburner, should be able to carry an external load of atleast 5000 kilograms (comprising air-to-air and air-to ground weapons) and fly for a minimum eight hours with air-to-air refueling, should be a 9G aircraft and talks of the maximum limit of a vertical or negative G the aircraft can pull and hold for more than 10 seconds with afterburners engaged.”
The thrust-to-weight ratio, is of critical importance, as a senior IAF official told DNA, “As the weight would only increase with the increase in armament and weapons onboard, therefore a powerful engine was required. Some have come close to the required parameters but some aircraft have shown disappointing results The aircraft should also have endurance for longer periods and the twin-seat trainer should be exactly like the single-seat fighter.”
Price:
The MoD had extended the date for price quotation and asked the six competing global fighter aircraft manufacturers for the revised price for the aircraft as the original deadline for the commercial bids to be opened was April 2010, according to the tender, which would have had the original price if the bids were opened on time. But owing to delay caused by the field evaluation of all six aircraft, an extension of three months was given, and the vendors were asked to submit their fresh prices, whether they would go with the original quoted price or would quote a revised price, was to be conveyed to the MoD.
By the end of July all six aircraft giants in the fray have to inform the MoD, whether there is a revision in the price of their aircraft or the old price be considered.
A senior IAF (Indian Air Force) told DNA, “The commercial bids of only the short-listed vendors will be opened, but the fresh price as on date needs to be known. Since the trials have caused delay, so the April 2010 deadline could not be met,” adding that finally the deal would go upto around 18 billion dollars with infrastructure, training and other expenditure included.
Governments of the aircraft manaufacturers rooting for their product:
It may also be noted that Government representatives of the aircraft manufacturing countries participating in this deal have started pitching for their respective aircraft.
DNA has learnt that Vice Admiral Jeffrey A Wieringa, Director Defence Security Cooperation Agency (DSCA) of the US, wrote to the MoD, that the global tender for the aircraft deal, be converted into a single vendor Hybrid FMS (foreign military sale) deal, suiting the US and one of its competing manufacturers be given the contract under it. FMS is a government-to-government agreement for a contract without an open tender, which makes it convenient for critical technologies to be transferred and also cuts out a lot of other hassles, thereby hastening up the process, but is expensive. The Hybrid FMS route is a special provision in the US government, given to a buyer country, interested in purchasing defence equipment from the US.
US Secretary of Defense, Robert Gates is believed to have written a similar letter in 2008, when the bids were submitted for the aircraft, to the MoD, to have an FMS agreement for the contract.
Letters from other Government representatives also have reached MoD, but South Block is understood to have turned down these requests, and is strictly following the Defence Procurement Procedure (DPP), with its transparency clause. All European governments are understood to be backing the Eurofighter Typhoon.
US Boeing’s F/A-18 IN Super Hornet
Reliable sources have confirmed to DNA that the F/A-18 IN Super Hornet, has an underpowered engine, with both engines adding upto 180 KN (wet power) , and the thrust to weight ratio being less than 1, which doesn’t meet the IAF ASQR, which should be more than one.
Said a senior IAF officer, “The .93 thrust to weight ratio of the Super Hornet speaks of the underpowered engines, plus the aircraft can only pull a maximum of 7.5 G, which is below the requirement which is 9G.”
According to company statement given to DNA by Boeing, “As required per India’s Defence Procurement Procedure, compliance demonstrations for all MMRCA Air Staff Qualitative Requirements were conducted with Super Hornets during the Field Evaluation Trials. The ultimate decision lies with the Indian Air Force, however, the US Navy / Boeing Team are confident that the demonstrations conducted during FET confirmed compliance with all MMRCA ASQRs.”
US Lockheed Martin’s F-16IN Super Viper.
The single-engine F-16IN Super Viper’s GE F110-GE-132A engine, produces up to 144 KN thrust and can pull 9 G and -3 vertical G, while engaging in combat manouvers. The aircraft has a thrust to weight ratio of 6.36:1 and, “Can fly for more than eight hours continuously with air-to-air refueling,” according to the response sent by the manufacturer to DNA. Calling it a completely new product, tailored to suit the IAF’s ASQRs, Lockheed stated that the twin-seat version would have all the operational attributes of a single-seat variant inclusive of a radar, and can carry an external load of more than 5000 kgs (which includes weapons).
Swedish Saab’s JAS 39 Gripen NG
Sweden’s Gripen Next Generation (NG), has an engine with wet power of 97.8 KN, and is a 9G aircraft with 13G in emergency and -3 vertical or negative G.
In a response to DNA, Swedish Saab said that, “The aircraft has sea level static thrust to weight ratio in Indian Standard Atmosphere conditions as 1:1 with full missile load.”
Gripen NG can carry an external load of 7200 kg of air-to-air and air-to-ground weapons and other external stores and fly more than eight hours with air-to-air refueling, and the twin seater variant will have the same operational attributes as the single seater.
European EADS’ Eurofighter Typhoon
The twin-engine multi-role fighter, in service in the airforces of Germany, UK Royal Airforce, Spain and Italy, the four countries engaged in manufacturing the aircraft, is yet to see combat, but has a wet power of both engines put together adding upto 180 KN thrust (20,000 lbs).
The Eurofighter Typhoon can pull +9 and -3 negative or vertical G, is able to carry an external load which of more than 7500 kg and can fly for more than eight hours with air-to-air refueling and the twin-seat will be similar to the single-seat version in operational attributes.
French Dassault Aviation’s Rafale fighter aircraft.
The twin-engine Rafale, operational in the French airforce and the Navy, has at the moment, the Snecma M88-2 with a wet thrust of 176 KN (both engines). A next generation engine, with a thrust of 9000kg, is being tested, but its date of availability is unknown, even as Dassault claims it will take three years.
The aircraft can pull -3 to 9G (11G in emergency), sustainable with a pilot.
Sources told DNA about the Rafale’s thrust to weight ratio, “This depends heavily on the fuel and weapon load, and it will be different for 25%, 50% or 100% fuel load.” According to different sources, the ratio of the Rafale (thrust to weight) may vary from 1.13 to 1.27.
The Rafale can carry a maximum of an external load of 9500 kg and can fly for around 15 hours with refueling.
The major differences between the single-seat and the twin-seat Rafale B are of weight and lower inner fuel capacity. The Rafale B is heavier by 350kg and its lower inner fuel capacity, which is around 400 liters of less fuel. The remaining equipment are similar, including the radar RBE-2.
Russian MiG-35 (As of now just one aircraft has been produced, the twin-seat MiG-35D)
Called a derivative of the existing MiG-29 fighter, the MiG-35 still doesn’t exist, and has just one aircraft flying, the twin-seat MiG-35D, which was unveiled in 2007 in Bangalore during Aero India.
With a thrust to weight ration being 1.03, the two engines provide a wet thrust of 176.6 KN. A 11G aircraft capable of a -3 vertical G, the MiG-35 twin-seat variant, the MiG-35D, has all the operational attributes of a single-seat fighter including the radar. The aircraft can fly more than eight hours ith refueling and can carry an external load of more than 5000 kgs.
So now you’ve moved from polite arguments to condescension?
Au contraire some of the life extension/upgrade packages for Western aircraft like the Harriers, teen series and various transport aircraft are quite extensive and go to the extent of replacing even parts of the airframe and wings, aside from the engines. Even the MiG-29SMT upgrade involves replacing the wings.
And somehow the pride of our VIP travel is more urgent than the danger to our pilots? Maybe the VIPs feel that way but it isn’t and never will be.
The money spent on upgrading old Mig 21s are better spent elsewhere, like the replacement of these ageing platforms etc. It is not done anywhere in the world. The MIG 29s are not as old as the 21s and are much more advanced platforms so it makes sense upgrading them (The Russian upgrade deal is a steal compared to the French Mirage one).
None of the western Aircraft were as old as our MiG 21s when they underwent these upgrades, or atleast they were more relevant multi role platforms (like the USN Hornets) which were worth upgrading and not short legged point defense fighters like the 21s.