dark light

quadbike

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 2,581 through 2,595 (of 3,473 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: MMRCA News and Discussion IV #2416876
    quadbike
    Participant

    Price of the TOT included ?

    Probably not, Neither would be the support infrastructure and weapons cost be included, but still would be fairly competitive with the cheaper birds (F 16, Gripen and MiG).

    Another thing is that Boeing is in a position to deliver the aircraft much earlier than the other competitors.

    quadbike
    Participant

    Last time I checked, neither IR missiles or radars operate at the frequency range human eyes do. 😉

    So what can the F 22 do against a modern IR missile (its generally agreed that flares won’t cut it). And what about guns ? The pilot was probably exaggerating 😉

    in reply to: Iranian Space and Missile discussion thread #1804419
    quadbike
    Participant

    +1 Russia just do not want to starve the population. I doubt it wants a Nuclear Iran anymore than America does. After all Iran is an Islamic republic and Russia is having trouble with Islamics for ages.

    quadbike
    Participant

    I’m sorry but i’m not following you, what exactly is not logical?

    We all know the F-22 is an extraordinary aircraft with extraordinary capabilities, well those of us who can put nationalism and petty jelousy aside for more than five minutes realise it is so why is it so far out of the question?

    I am not Jealous. Infact I have been pro F 22/F 35 for all my time in this forum. And I do believe having the biggest R&D budget does make a difference etc.

    But to say that you cannot put a ‘weapon system’ including an IR missile or Guns on the F 22 you can see through the canopy is …………………. ILLOGICAL

    Just because some is qualified do not mean he cannot be wrong or he cannot lie. The credit crisis is an example for people who should have supposedly better judgement and knowledge deceiving millions.

    in reply to: MMRCA News and Discussion IV #2417013
    quadbike
    Participant

    I raised the same issue since the very beginning. For that budget, only Gripen and Mig-35 are on the dancefloor.

    The f 16 and F 18 are also in as well I would believe. But I doubt about the bigger Eurobirds.

    Boeing was quoting like 55 million/super hornet 😮

    in reply to: Indian Space & Missile Discussion II #1804426
    quadbike
    Participant

    BrahMos Ready for Launch from Submarines

    The Indo-Russian joint venture BrahMos cruise missile is ready for launch from underwater platform to enable it to be used in a submarine, the Lok Sabha was informed today.

    Defence Minister A K Antony, in a written reply, told the House that the missile, which can hit targets 290 km away, had recently proved its capability to be launched vertically from a naval warship and manoeuvred to hit the target ship, thereby meeting the Navy’s requirements.

    BrahMos, the world’s only supersonic cruise missile that touches speeds of 2.8 Mach, was developed initially as an anti-ship version for launch from ship-to-ship for the Indian Navy and inducted into service, he said

    Later, land-to-land version was developed for the Army and Air Force, he said, noting that this version was already inducted into the Army and is under production for both the Army and Air Force.

    Antony said test was also carried out from ship-to-land target recently.

    The air version of the missile was under development for IAF’s Su-30MKI fighter jet, which would be ready in 2012.

    “Some parts of the missile components and the airborne launcher are currently being produced in Thiruvananthapuram complex of BrahMos Aerospace. It is planned to set up the integration complex in the adjacent land belonging to IAF, so that the manufacturing of the missile can be from the Thiruvananthapuram complex,” he added.

    The DRDO has recently provided Rs 50 crore as the first instalment for the facility realisation.

    Source

    in reply to: Indian Air Force – News & Discussion # 13 #2417015
    quadbike
    Participant

    I think you’ve misunderstood him. As I read it, he said that tooling was part of the deal, but a part that was not executed well.

    Not executed well because BAE supplied the wrong tools and jigs.

    quadbike
    Participant

    I would say you simply cannot except that facts of the matter, as would the vast majority of reasonable and objective individuals. Again though his word carries infinatly more weight behind it than an internet forum user.
    You will have to learn to live with it as the quote in question won’t be banished into oblivion just because you and a few others don’t approve of it.

    If its not logical then only the most blinded would approve of it. Logic > Reputation.

    in reply to: MMRCA News and Discussion IV #2418001
    quadbike
    Participant

    The Indian media exaggerated the failure actually it was something fairly minor and they had to make some minor changes to pass the trials.

    quadbike
    Participant

    Good to know where you stand. So are all fighter pilots liars or only the ones who say things you don’t like to hear?

    The question is if one can see the Raptor through the canopy then that is well with in range of the guns and the IR AAMs, both do not necessarily require a radar and is immune to jamming.

    How can a raptor escape for example from an ASRAAM designated by the JHMCS of an RAAF Hornet ? or a gun kill. So I would say the pilot was talking **** 😉

    in reply to: Rafale v Typhoon and the F22… #2418260
    quadbike
    Participant

    The Rafale is of course cleared for LGB but lacks the pod , it can ‘t use unguided rockets either . It can do all the rest .

    How economical is using the AASM for a not so high value target, but a target you must take out none-the less. One of the best things about LGBs are they are relatively inexepsnive. The LGBs/POD combo still makes a lot of sense for many potential customers of the Rafale than the AASM.

    in reply to: Russia cuts Pak-da, T-95, and a bunch of other stuff #2418266
    quadbike
    Participant

    I hope India orders whatever new armour and protection systems the Russians will have on their T 90s. People here have been seriously worried about the lack of crew protection and armour inside the crew compartment. India will probably end up with more T90s than Russia at some point.

    in reply to: Indian Air Force – News & Discussion # 13 #2418278
    quadbike
    Participant

    We all know that the tooling was not a part of the deal that was good. Atleast that is what we heard from Hall. Let us see how they cope with next order.

    Tooling as others pointed out was always part of the deal. The problem was that some of the jigs and tools were different. It is also believed that HAL had some issues assimilating the technology (BAE claim). All in all HAL was not entirely happy with BAEs dealings in the Hawk deal that is why there was talk about a new tender, which probably made BAE get its act together,

    There is little point in getting another AJT and adding to the logistical nightmare.

    in reply to: Beauty Contest: Tejas vs Gripen #2418284
    quadbike
    Participant

    Robban they are awesome.

    in reply to: Indian Navy News and Discussions #2000774
    quadbike
    Participant

    INS Kamorta, the first Project 28 Anti-submarine Corvette, launched at Garden Reach Shipbuilders and Engineers (GRSE) today

    Mrs Mamatha M, wife of Shri MM Pallam Raju, Hon’ble Raksha Rajya Mantri, today launched first of its kind Anti Submarine Warfare(ASW) Corevette at GRSE shipyard in Kolkata. Shri MM Pallam Raju, Mr Asim Kr Dasgupta, Hon’ble Minister of Finance & Excise, Govt of West Bengal, Shri RK Singh, Secretary of Defence Productions and Vice Admiral Anup Singh were present on this occasion.

    The ASW Corvette belongs to the Kamorta Class of Warships with Anti Submarine Warfare capability and very low signature of radiated under water noise. This Corvette is designated to be a frontline warship for the Indian Navy. This ship is equipped with Sophisticated arrangement for mounting Ships machinery. The weapon Systems and sensor suits of this ship are fully indigenous. The ‘X’ form of hull and superstructure gives her a low radar cross section. The Ship’s hull form has overall length of 109 mtrs and can cut through the sea at a very high speed of 25 knots. She is built with special grade high tensile steel.

    The propulsion system of the ship typifies power combined with flexibility and consists of two controllable pitch propellers. It has four indigenously made Diesel engines each of 3800 kw. The ASW Corvette is 13.7 mtrs wide. Four ASW Corvettes are presently under construction at GRSE.

    The launching of this ship marked the completion of 50 years of GRSE’s glorious existence. Though it was set up in year 1884 as a private enterprise named Garden Reach Workshop Ltd, it was taken over by the Govt of India and placed under administrative control of Min of Defence in 1960. Since then the company has come a long way with steady expansion of infrastructure, keeping pace with time and catering to defence preparedness of the country.

    Today the ship yard has six manufacturing units in and around Kolkata and one at Ranchi. GRSE is committed to building warships of highest standards for Indian Navy and Coast Guard. The Company is modernizing its infrastructure at an estimated cost of over 530 crores rupees. This includes building a large Dry Dock and an inclined berth, a 250 tonnes Goliath Crane and modular halls with allied workship facilities.


    Source

Viewing 15 posts - 2,581 through 2,595 (of 3,473 total)