Massive search on for missing trawler
Mumbai: Vigilance has been stepped up along the entire coast of Maharashtra with over a dozen navy and coast guard ships and several reconnaissance aircrafts carrying out a massive search operation. The search, which began on Monday for a suspicious fishing trawler that was last spotted off the Diu coast, has heightened fears of another 26/11-type terror attack.
The trawler with a fake name and a fake registration number was spotted by fishermen around 25 nautical miles off Diu on Monday evening. The fishermen had complained to security agencies that they had seen a white boat with Al-Salam written on it with five persons on board, who were asking for directions from them. Even the registration number of the trawler was that of another vessel by the name of Rajmani, which was registered 20 years ago and is lying unused at Porbander.
According to sources, around 10 navy ships have been carrying out extended patrols in the Arabian Sea along with several coast guard vessels and surveillance aircrafts. But even after over 36 hours of search, the trawler is yet to be tracked.
โFollowing the information about the suspicious fishing trawler, Indian Navy, coast guard and the police are maintaining a strict vigil along the 720km coastline. We are keeping a close watch on the movements of fishermen along the coastline. Fishermen have also been asked to remain alert,โ a senior police official said.
The search operation has reminded many of the 26/11 terror attack that shook the city. Even then, 10 terrorists had hijacked an Indian fishing trawler and reached the Mumbai coast. What has further heightened fears about the missing trawler is that the fishermen who spotted it said the vessel had no fishing net and other fishing equipment on it.
According to a source from the navy, the vessel could have already reached its intended destination in the past 24 hours
K8 is 50-50 share of profit.
JF17 is 58-42 share profit.And indeed the one that paid for devlopment owns rights, unless it is written in contract. Why would JF17-01 (test plane) wear one side PAF markings?
Of course you will get sales revenue ๐ I am only saying that Pakistan did not develop anything they just paid for it. You do not necessarily get the IP for things you pay for, for example UAE Block 60s. But if China gives Pakistan good for them. ๐
I know I am right, so no point arguing about I.P. ๐ I leave you to your opinions.:D
Toshiba comment I was gonna modify, but you read it before I could. Plus my message was Insig, he will get what I am saying. I expected you to pick holes in it. Lastly it is impressive for Chengu to build to J 10 and JF 17, whilst HAL is struggling with LCA. I see you are agreeing with me.
The Chinese are more street smart than Indians, they have got the base design of the J 10 from the Israelis and developed it into something thats quite formidable which is a commendable achievement in itself.
As for the LCA it is a program which was poorly managed and hit by foreign sanctions numerous times. The good thing is that they are integrating new tech as they go and by the time its ready it would still be competitive.
As for India vs China on military tech, China is way ahead be it by hook or by crook.
Indian armed forces set for paradigm shift with Super Hercules airlifter
March 30 (IANS) In just about a year the Indian Air Force (IAF) will begin receiving the first of six C-130J Super Hercules airlifters it has purchased for $1 billion, the aircraft signaling a paradigm shift in the manner in which the armed forces train for specialised operations.
For the first time, the IAF will be able to conduct precision low-level flying operations, airdrops and landings in blackout conditions as the aircraft will be equipped with an infrared detection set (IDS).
And, to ensure 80 percent availability of the aircraft at any given time, its manufacturer Lockheed Martin has offered a long-term maintenance contract to the IAF on the lines of the ones it has with the US Air Force and the air forces of Australia, Britain and Canada.
The six aircraft for the IAF are currently on the production line in a cavernous building the size of 76 football fields with the first one due to roll out in December.
‘That is when the IAF will gets first look at the aircraft. After flight tests and other trials, the aircraft will be handed over in the first quarter of 2011,’ Jack Crisler, director of the C-130J programme, told a group of visiting Indian journalists, adding that the sixth aircraft was scheduled for delivery by the end of 2011.
The C-130J primarily performs the tactical portion of an airlift mission. The aircraft is capable of operating from rough, dirt strips and is the prime transport for air dropping troops and equipment into hostile areas.
The flexible design of the Super Hercules enables it to be configured for many different missions, allowing for one aircraft to perform the role of many. Much of the special mission equipment added to the Super Hercules is removable, allowing the aircraft to quickly switch between roles.
To this end, the six C-130Js will primarily be deployed for the operations of the Indian Army’s Special Forces, even as the IAF mulls the purchase of another six aircraft, some of them configured as midair refuellers.
‘Some of the other six could well be the MC-130J version,’ said Robert A. Lowe, Lockheed Martin’s business development director (Air Mobility), adding that the tankers could refuel both fixed wing and rotary aircraft.
As for the maintenance contract, Abhay Paranjape, Lockheed Martin’s India director for the C-130J programme, said: ‘On our part, we have made the offer, promising 80 percent of aircraft availability at any given time.’
‘We are awaiting the IAF’s response,’ he added.
Should this come through, it will be first time the IAF will have outsourced aircraft maintenance.
Meanwhile, the first of the 18 IAF crews that will be trained on the C-130J will arrive here in October. ‘We are planning to train 18 crews in three years,’ Crisler said.
The C-130Js will operate out of the IAF’s Hindon Air Base on the outskirts of New Delhi and Lockheed Martin has already begun constructing facilities for them at the base.
These include hangers and maintenance facilities, as also a cockpit simulator and a weapons system trainer.
‘So advanced is the simulator that a pilot can literally walk from it to the aircraft,’ Crisler pointed out.
“Current” word, confuses me, seems to suggest PAF only airforce that can design aircraft. You need to rephrase it.
I only agree with certain members when they say JF 17 is totally Chinese built and designed, because if I say Pak had imput they will demand proof. Note, one of these guys is even saying Pak wont get any I.P rights even though paid half. I think they are desperate in attempts to discredit JF 17. Usually if you pay to build something, you usually get some rights over product. If a builder extends your house, does it mean they can live there, even if you paid for it? Apparently Toshiba still owns my laptop, because they designed and built it.:rolleyes:
Edit, I posted comment before I read your message. You are predictable.LOL
I am not discrediting the achievement that is JF 17. It is a fine achievement for Chinese Aviaiton, but for Pakistan it is nothing more than License production of an aircraft. IF I.P rights are transfered it would be China’s gift to Pakistan rather than Pakistan developing something so that it would have IP rights.
About Toshiba, Even though you own the laptop you do not have the right to copy patented technology in it, unless Toshiba is your friend and says ‘here take it’
Abhimanyu in his post called it Eurocopter Tiger, I just partly copied him, by just calling it Eurocopter. When we have more data on helicopter then I we can make a solid conclusion.
@Quad bank
If you are saying Pakistan just paid to develop fighter. We can safely say they have IP rights. This is not the Mig 15, 19 and 21 transfer deals with China, where totally paid and built by Russia. Atleast Kramer replied to my points, maybe you thought the need to divert attention from reported weakenesses of helicopter.
Give us all evidence about a single part that Pakistan has designed and developed. We have been asking for this for ages. If you cannot kindly stop making claims about IP rights, and call it ToT.
Weakness of the helicopter that is in prototype stage ? And reported by whom the Great Type 59 of AFM forum ?
:rolleyes:
And don’t get me started on China and ‘transfer deals’. Pick your own thread to flame.
jackjack, 2000 years ago, everybody knew the earth is flat… now, is it?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/7540427.stm
๐
As long as Russia maintains a military force in Moldova, Romania will be equipped for the possibility of assisting Moldova in liberating its occupied territory. The long term goal is for the reunification of Moldova and Romania but the Russians and Bulgarians don’t want that.
:rolleyes::D:eek::o:diablo::(:mad::confused:
@ Romanians helping Moldova to oust Russians.
http://attach.high-g.net/attachments/f22_03_106.jpgThe image shows the ceramic RAM (C-RAM) covered divergent flaps, C-RAM covered side walls. The blocker’s (called Turbine Exhaust Case by P&W) conical center body is also C-RAM covered but is too dark to be seen in the picture. But the ends of the serpentine baffles, where the augmentor fuel spray nozzles are located, stand out well.
F-35 has a similar arrangement except the nozzle is axisymmetric.
That image shows Thou Shalt not steal
Firstly, lets try and articulate that sentence properly. It makes no sense.
Secondly, why on an IAF thread?Flame grilled….
Because Type 59 said at-least Pakistan will have IP rights for the JF 17. You don’t get IP rights for things you do not make.
C’mon guy’s.This is a topic about India. Why keep mixing the topics? We all know what it will bring.
Anyway. All attack choppers seems to look the same but this one has definately huge cockpit and superb views for pilot. Good choice. Only that gear keeps looking a bit large. Probably a temp solution. The tail looks like Druv.
If you are fair to yourself you would know who started that rant.
I do not know if the huge glass sections is a good thing, I guess it would be bullet proof to small arms fire. Then again its the ‘Light attack’ Helicopter….light and zippy, MI 35s and Apaches (in future) would be the heavy hitters.
What exactly does Pakistan have IP rights for in the JF 17 ?
Actually it is needed for China..
Anyway isn’t the cost a reason for the lack of the TU-160’s in Russia?..if India puts in the money,then I don’t see why the production can’t be started again.
Tu 160 is a heavy strategic bomber, although the Russians may be OK to sell it to us, they may come under pressure from others so as not to give it to us. Strategic bombers are not often sold especially to countries which do not have the capability to make them indigenously.
Tu 22M is more plausible.
IN is expecting 30 years of service from her.
GSLV to be launched on April 15
Indiaโs GSLV rocket, powered by home-made cryogenic engine for the first time, would be launched on April 15 from Sriharikota to place into orbit GSAT-4 experimental satellite. Previous GSLV flights were fitted with Russian engines.
The Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO) also fixed May 5 as the date for the launch of the Cartosat-2B by Polar Satellite Launch Vehicle (PSLV).
The mission readiness review conducted by ISRO at Sriharikota yesterday finalised the dates, and gave the go-ahead for the two launches, sources in the space agency said.
Besides the Cartosat-2B, the PSLV would also have on board an Algerian satellite and some small and nano satellites, ISRO sources said