dark light

EELightning

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 286 through 300 (of 2,664 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: BAE Replica movie #2241501
    EELightning
    Participant

    And what did they get from Eurofighter program?

    They were heavily involved in the very early days of the programme, shared and exchanged information with the other partners so they would have received a certain amount of knowledge and know how, and they’re hardly going to forget all about that after they left… It’s pretty self-explanatory, isn’t it not?

    France needed a smaller fighter than UK wanted so as to use on carrier.

    Indeed, they also wanted a significant amount of share, too. Much too much. And I’d hardly call the Rafale a smaller fighter than Typhoon, same class more like, excluding the carrier part obviously. Not sure where that popped up from.

    in reply to: BAE Replica movie #2241872
    EELightning
    Participant

    Rafale NG is in the pipes, but nothing is decided. But Dassault is definitely commited in cooperation about EFCAS with BAE. What frightens me is when France will want carrier capabilities…

    They were definitely committed in cooperation with the Tornado and Eurofighter programmes, yet they pulled out and went their way – after getting what they needed that is. Taking those situations into account, as well as requirements, I wouldn’t have France on-board the third time around. Twice bitten thrice shy. I’d rather stick with Germany, Italy, Spain and I would most certainly attempt to push Sweden to get involved. However, it’s requirements for the latter so I wouldn’t bank on them joining.

    in reply to: Eurofighter Typhoon Discussion and News 2014 #2243104
    EELightning
    Participant

    If they come back and say that T3B features new engines and tvc and conformal weapons pods, then maybe that will change the minds of at least 2 of the partner nations (who are purchasing F35)….

    I doubt there’ll ever be new engines for Typhoon, upgraded/enhanced ones yes, nothing new, they already provide more than their fair share of grunt. TVC ain’t never going to materialise in my opinion, there’s really no need for them – similar reasons for afore mentioned. Conformal Weapons Pods, there’s more chance of a Time Machine being invented in the next week before those… In any case, those upgrades/enhancements won’t persuade anyone to think twice, it’s all about cost, and cost is the primary reason why they’re being cut or either cancelled. Nothing to do with capabilities.

    in reply to: BAE Replica movie #2243538
    EELightning
    Participant

    Test article only. Never intended to fly, or lead to anything that will fly.

    I would agree with the first two. The third, why wouldn’t it lead to anything else that would fly?

    in reply to: BAE Replica movie #2243560
    EELightning
    Participant

    For all we know they’re probably just moving it from point A to point B to free up space in point A, nothing more. Stick it in the shed for now.

    On the other hand, it does look to have had a different scheme for some reason, reason(s) I can’t imagine why. So maybe they’re starting on something, working out dimensions for fresh blueprints, maybe? Now that we’ve got a slightly better look of it’s angles via video it does like it’s just a rough idea for an airframe; make it as Stealthy as possible, quite literally cut corners to get a minimum RCS then start to be more realistic for an operational airframe, larger nose, larger wing area, possibly lengthen it etc… Basically a slightly larger version of the Replica, who knows.

    Something is definitely happening though, Typhoon will need to be replaced at some point, so now’s the time to start coming up with ideas.

    in reply to: Did Anything Bring A Smile To Your Face Today? #1869659
    EELightning
    Participant

    European leg of the tour over, pretty gutted, a lot of fun… But back home to the UK to recharge for a short while then heading off to the US and Canada for a 23 gig leg, starting next week. Happy-Happy!

    Lets hope this time the US Customs don’t f*ck up my Orange Rockerverb like they did with my Mesa Boogie last time. Gormless twits!

    in reply to: The Official F1 Thread #1870004
    EELightning
    Participant

    Been to Silverstone, that was awesome. Met Damon Hill 3 times, great guy. I asked for his steering wheel the first time… He said no! In a nice way, because Williams were too tight to give anything away. When I met him the second time when he was driving for Jordan, we had a great discussion. I asked how does the Jordan 198 drive. He said it drives as good as Eddie’s (Jordan) shirts look! 3rd time was at Croft with his son Josh and wife Georgie, great bunch. Georgie bought us all a Bacon Sandwich from a Burger stand. What’s nice is, Damon remembered me from the previous two occasions. 🙂

    in reply to: The Official F1 Thread #1870092
    EELightning
    Participant

    Indeed. But with Sky F1 having all year round coverage they’re going to be pushing for news of the updates of the cars. Sky is a money making corporation so they’d do anything to get more viewers, which they kinda need anyway because they’re not getting the number of viewers they’re targeting for. But yes, it takes something special away from the first race of the season. I’d like to get some information, but not too much to a point where everything will seem not new by time the first official Free Practice.

    I’ve just learned: To change this years Turbo/KERS V6 engines, it takes approximately 6 hours, compared to 45 minutes previously. So, have an issue in Free Practice 1 which results in an engine change, you will miss Free Practice 2. Have an engine issue in Free Practice 3 which results in an engine change, you miss Qualifying, there for you’ll start at the rear of the grid or from the Pit Lane exit… Oh and, receive a Position Drop for the next race because it’s a penalty for an engine change. That’s… Pretty damn harsh.

    Also, teams have a maximum of 5 engines per driver for the whole season as opposed to 8 engines per driver the previous season.

    in reply to: Ukraine #1870299
    EELightning
    Participant

    EELightning I could not agree with you more. I would add to that but Moggy already thinks I am a Nazi when I mention some of our neighbours and allies.

    I believe a simple sentence: ‘It’s not our doing to introduce rules, the real architects of new rules are the ones that commit acts of uncalled treatment to others.’

    I have spent a good deal of my life rescuing cats and trying to find homes for dogs but enough of that or my mouth will get me into trouble!

    That’s jolly nice to know. You shouldn’t keep your mouth shut for something you believe is the right thing to do, and what you do is the right thing. I’m quite an Animal Activist and I do everything I can, not to boast but. I have a second job that pays well, it involves touring (Musician you see) and the downside is that we can’t keep pets at home because we’re away from it a lot, my Girlfriend comes with us too, so we can’t look after anything. On the plus side, we donate a percentage of our wage to various Animal charities which is split between them. And as a bonus, it’s poke in the eye of the HMRC too.

    Sadly, there never seems enough to be done.

    in reply to: The Official F1 Thread #1870301
    EELightning
    Participant

    Absolutely. I’ve been watching Sky F1’s Ted Kravits’ Notebook, not actually on Sky, I’m a BBC guy out of principle, but via Youtube (free) and the access he’s got a hold of is pretty overwhelming. He has close up shots of the rear of the likes of the McLaren where they have a controversial system going on, and as far as I know they’re not at all happy with Ted and his handy-cam, they’ve even declined technical discussions with Sky F1 now that some other teams are kicking up a fuss, purely because they haven’t thought of it… Correction: They’ll kick up a fuss if it works.

    That’s quite a significant revelation so early in the year. We didn’t get to see Brawn’s ground breaking Double Diffuser until the first race of ’09. But, with the level of access and instant communication today it’s tough for teams to keep elements hidden, Ferrari are taking pretty paranoia like precautions to prevent anyone seeing too much.

    Suggesting an element of deception at the public is interesting. It’s not uncommon to see teams, or shall I say; for teams to suggest they’re struggling in an attempt to shake off the others. Red Bull are guilty of this and they’ve “indicated to have had technical issues” in past pre-season tests. Last year, they didn’t run as much as the others because they were having some “technical teething issues”, yet 13 race wins, a Drivers Championship and Constructers Championship later, well… They were fine. I guess they tried to make the other teams think their own cars were up to task to challenge them, there for making them not research much else and introduce improvements to the car before the season got under way. One wonders, are Red Bull attempting to pull the same stunt again?…

    in reply to: Ukraine #1870306
    EELightning
    Participant

    Most of us have seen the horrific pictures and video by now. I really despair at this I and I have trouble in coming to grips with it all. Simplistically it seems some people want to be closer to Russia and others want to join the EU(unless I have got this wrong) It saddens me to see so much death and violence in what is supposed to be a democratic country. As for the woman be executed by shooting her in the head(images now thankfully removed from the net)

    Here-here.

    Why would we want barbarians in the EU?

    We already have, Romania. Different country, totally different topic I know, but… In Romania there’s a situation happening where it’s absolutely legal to capture stray Cats and Dogs, more about Dogs than anything as there’s more of them, and brutally beat them to death right there and then on the streets. The whole point of this is to get rid of stray animals off the street, no matter how; bludgeon them to death, shoot them, hang them from Trees, drag them behind from moving vehicles, you can even torture them… so long as they’re off the street. Like the situation in the Ukraine, this makes me sick… And this is an EU country that commits these acts of cruelty, it’s not against the law… but it is against the law and ‘illegal’ to own and set off Fireworks.

    It’s about time the EU had new rules. Follow Human and Animal equality otherwise you’re not going to be part of the Union. Simple as.

    in reply to: The Official F1 Thread #1870386
    EELightning
    Participant

    Indeed, testing is to iron out any issues before the season starts. If everything was fine, there’s no way the teams would let the drivers open up the full potential of the cars, they wouldn’t risk giving too much away. That’s why when you see them out on track, they’re backing off or/and not fully powering up regardless of the times. Most of the time they spend either going pretty slow using all the revs and the 8th gear (yep, 8 gears this year), or going flat out and probably going no higher than 5th or 6th gear. To work out speeds and aerodynamics they tend to use various weird and wonderful devices for measurements.

    The first real flat out test is always the first race.

    in reply to: Eurofighter Typhoon Discussion and News 2014 #2245465
    EELightning
    Participant

    Yes, you got it right. Things are not the same as they were 6-7 years ago. Now the “second-best” is gone and the whole thing is just lagging behind.
    That’s just a pity it took 6 years or so to figure that out.

    Some people, the more ignorant ones, have a common belief that if anything isn’t reported to the public, then it has received no upgrades nor enhancements = inferior in every way. Such as the way the Troll Princess thinks, the one that has had more Bans and Usernames than a my Amp Heads have had a change of Tubes.

    Your contribution is… appreciated…

    I agree that the MOD almost certainly do not plan to procure more Typhoon. However, if it transpires that F-35B costs $10,000 per hour more to fly than Typhoon then every squadron of F-35B (say 20 frames) will cost $10,000 x 20 x 6,000 more than Typhoon over a service life of 6,000 hours = $1.2 billion. It may be that the harsh reality of defence spending limits will make it necessary to choose to operate more of the less expensive type and less of the more expensive type.

    Such costs are rather too early to speculate about, harmless nevertheless but one sees your point. If one chooses to operate the less expensive type than the other then the situation for the latter is going to be quite a headache to work out when it’s pilots and ground crew are brought into the view. In the British Armed Forces, training and deployments are exempt from budget cuts where as the equipment isn’t, if the more expensive does see less flight time then something will need to be done for the crew. The RAF at least calls for a certain amount of hours per year on simulators for frontline fast jet pilots – IIRC is around the 40 hour mark per pilot, annually, actual flights are well over 240+ hours a year per pilot (note: from moment of take-off to the moment of touch down), excluding international deployments… Those hours will have to be made up somehow. However, as afore mentioned, equipment isn’t exempt from cuts so there’s a little uncertainty where the ‘more expensive to operate aeroplane’ falls in to which category, if you like. Does it have to be kept in the hanger more often due to high operating costs there for personnel will lack training and deployments… Or does it get used as the same amount as the other aircraft because the training and deployments standards need to be met annually, regardless of aircraft operating costs. One suspects the latter… Either that or more pilots per aircraft.

    in reply to: Eurofighter Typhoon Discussion and News 2014 #2246226
    EELightning
    Participant

    Saudi’s buying 72 of them….

    I know… They’re also interested in additional Typhoons.

    in reply to: The Official F1 Thread #1870595
    EELightning
    Participant

    Yep, they seem pretty pessimistic about the cars. However, Lewis Hamilton stated in Jerez, where they lack in power compared to the ’13 V8s they make up with Torque. With the KERS and Turbo on the V6s actually produce around 30-40 more HP than last years engine. Which is interesting… I suspect the lap times will be very close to last years or slightly quicker even. In ’13, the KERS + V8s couldn’t always get the power down on the track when the drivers wanted, sometimes but not always, they wasted a lot of power sometimes. The ’14 F1 cars seems to have more power available to them when needed… But we’ll have to wait and see in Melbourne.

    With regards to the technology, I think the FIA have took the wrong path, but it’s still early days, so… I think they need to go back to the V10s or V12s… and hey, why not W16s? Why?… Look at the road cars of the likes by Audi, McLaren, Bugatti, Mercedes, Porsche, concepts by Jaguar and BMW etc… They’re making these huge engines that produce insane amounts of power, have bonkers amounts of Torque yet they somehow produce less emissions than most small cars and even less than the likes of Toyota’s Prius, and they use less fuel than previous engines of the same size… I honestly think bigger the way to go.

    Give the same F1 engineers say, a V12, give them the same rules and regulations but make them aware that fuel efficiency is the key, and they could make it work. I’d bet my last Quid on it they could come up with something, quite simply, stunning and ground breaking!

    10 years ago on Top Gear, Jeremy Clarkson drove an Audi A8 with a TDI V8 engine from London to Edinburgh then back again on one 20 Gallon tank of fuel. 10 years ago…

Viewing 15 posts - 286 through 300 (of 2,664 total)