dark light

EELightning

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 406 through 420 (of 2,664 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: F-35 News, Multimedia & Discussion thread (2) #2258537
    EELightning
    Participant

    In this context I think ‘England’ is indeed appropriate. After all, much of the historical rivalry predates the Acts of Union. 🙂

    It must be a Colonial thing…

    My first thought was the new Minis. But then that’s a BMW marque now isn’t it? Telling.

    Hardly. Very poor example. Like I said, there’s much more designed, produced and manufactured in the UK than many think there is.

    in reply to: F-35 News, Multimedia & Discussion thread (2) #2262234
    EELightning
    Participant

    It’s odd to think that the eternal rivalry between France and Britain actually does have a coda: in the European twilight, France has proven to possess a greatness that its rival does not.

    Not England.

    Are you sure about that? There’s so many other sectors in the UK that we design and produce where others envy and indeed lack. Small example: Want to design and produce a Racing Car (pick any Formula), ask a few Brits and they’ll cook one up in the UK and stick a Mercedes AMG, Red Bull or a Renault badge on it.

    Just because they don’t produce ‘Made in the UK’ fighters no more doesn’t mean they lack overall in what they produce elsewhere.

    in reply to: The PAK-FA News, Pics & Debate Thread XXIV #2262822
    EELightning
    Participant

    it only sound strange to you because you cannot admit your bias and racism. Blah, blah, blah…

    When all else fails, just play the Racism Card.

    How about you keep quiet and let the thread be what it is, which was rather interesting not so long ago, now it’s just getting like another one to avoid because of people like you.

    in reply to: F-35 News, Multimedia & Discussion thread (2) #2263354
    EELightning
    Participant

    In Libya it also proved to require very few maintenance hours, even compared to the Tornado.

    Out of all the aircraft that took part during the Libyan Campaign, the Typhoon had the least number of Ground Support Personnel maintaining it than any other fighter. According to a Squadron Leader (forget his name) from ’11 Squadron, RAF Leeming. AFM Report in ’11.

    in reply to: F-35 News, Multimedia & Discussion thread (2) #2263356
    EELightning
    Participant

    JSR is right about opportunity cost tho. “Look at the benefits JSF brings to UK industry” ignores the benefits UK industry could’ve accrued by pursuing alternative paths foreclosed by JSF. To be fair the real epic blunders came before JSF — no Harrier successor, Typhoon unable to operate from aircraft carrier, etc.

    How is not making the Typhoon Carrier capable a blunder? The JSF/F-35 was always going to be ordered for the Royal Naval FAA, what was/is a blunder is that they’re getting the ‘B’ variant and not the ‘C’. The other blunder is retiring the Harrier early. The worse case scenario should have been the RAF lose their Harrier fleet while retaining the Typhoon and Tornado force, which would have been fine as is the case now, what should have happened is that the FAA should have retained or took delivery of the RAF’s Harriers until sufficient numbers of the F-35 were in service. The Harrier GR9 could have been upgraded in the meantime, a Radar – and why not the Blue Vixen the FA2 had – not on all aircraft but enough to have a sufficient Air Defence capabilities, could have been perfectly acceptable to go with those options but, as always, PMs don’t think in a logical sense.

    The Typhoon was always going to be a land based aircraft, it’s requirements were initially A/A and A/G capable later on, actually the latter came sooner than originally planned, and it was always going to replace the Tornado F3 and Jaguar GR1/3 in RAF service. AS is stands now, Typhoon is going to replace the Tornado GR4, as stated by Group Captain Ian Gale. At the end of the day, nobody foreseen the early retirement of the Harrier, no one can’t say that it’s a blunder that the Typhoon wasn’t designed with carrier Operations in mind just because the Harrier got axed, otherwise the same could be said for the Tornado.

    in reply to: F-35 News, Multimedia & Discussion thread (2) #2263445
    EELightning
    Participant

    UK has limited skilled labor…

    If you actually got off your lazy ar$e and done your research on what the UK designs, manufactures and produces you wouldn’t sound like such an imbecile. So, do you care to make an incredibly large list of things in all sectors, ranging from musical equipment to some of the largest and best Warships afloat?

    in reply to: F-35 News, Multimedia & Discussion thread (2) #2264026
    EELightning
    Participant

    Considering that few current systems have ROVER and no non-US systems employ it, yet they seem to do CAS just fine…. I would say your argument that it is “required” is a gross overstatement.

    Ehm… The Tornado GR4 has ROVER.

    in reply to: F-35 News, Multimedia & Discussion thread (2) #2264772
    EELightning
    Participant

    Pissy tonight are we? Since you’ve gone off-topic/personal anyways, tell me something. Did Guy quietly scoop you on the SR-72 concept, or did LM just outright say they’d talk to anyone but you?

    You’ve simply failed to explain why the countries that operate Rafale and Typhoon initially went with an A/A requirement, instead you’ve just posted an image which has nothing to do with the discussion. That’s a sign that you’ve been brought down to earth with a bang. Epic fail!

    in reply to: Eurofighter Typhoon Discussion and News 2013 and beyond #2265716
    EELightning
    Participant

    This may have been EElightnings image (perhaps others can see it and its just me?):

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]222666[/ATTACH]

    Yes, sorry I didn’t reply earlier. But aye, that’s the one I tried to post earlier. Cheers!

    Mack8, you’re welcome! Regarding Radar – 1, 2 & 3, I shall post some information soon, later today hopefully. I’ve got a rough idea from memory but I’ll probably miss something out so it’ll just be better if I search through my files when I’ve got a bit of spare time, save on making mistakes. But like I say, hopefully later today.

    in reply to: Mig-31 as the ultimate fighter ? #2266668
    EELightning
    Participant

    still no one able to answear how gen 4 , 4.5 gain advantage against mig-31

    If the Mig-31 is such an amazing machine then why isn’t anyone falling over themselves to purchase it instead of the aircraft you believe is inferior to?

    Basically, what you’ve done is is that you’ve made a thread highlighting that what you stated is your opinion and all you have done is argue about it. Just because you have an opinion doesn’t mean it’s factual.

    in reply to: Eurofighter Typhoon Discussion and News 2013 and beyond #2266684
    EELightning
    Participant

    Not exactly my “domain”, but curious, what are the plans in regard to the AESA? I understand Tranche 3A won’t have it, when is it scheduled to be integrated? Will Oman have the AESA? Is there a Tranche 3B for the 4 partner nations planned ? Thanks.

    I’ve been out of touch the past few months due to work commitments so I’m not fully up to date, if ever I was, so I’ve more than likely missed something as things seem to change on a daily basis with Typhoon. To my, somewhat limited at the moment, knowledge there’s been no signed contract when it comes to actually purchasing a number of Captor-Es for each Typhoon operator, however, despite this integration of the Captor-E has been underway for sometime already and there is a Typhoon based at BAE Warton with Captor-E installed and is due for it’s maiden flight in ’14.

    Little to no information regarding what the RAFO (Oman) will feature on their Typhoons has been released, but taking into mind the time/delivery schedule of the aircraft and the Captor-E’s Roadmap, they will likely have Captor-E, quite possibly the ‘Radar-1’ variant which is an export model. There are three variants, ‘Radar-1’, ‘Radar-2’ and ‘Radar-3’.

    As for Tranche 3B. As far as I know the partner nations haven’t signed anything due to economy concerns. I wouldn’t be surprised if Tranche 3Bs are exported, to the likes of Oman and Saudi Arabia and such.

    in reply to: Typhoon Pictures #2266999
    EELightning
    Participant

    mmmmm T3……. I feel like I have waited half my life to clap eyes upon you!

    But, Cher still looks the same as she did years & years ago! :dev2:

    in reply to: Eurofighter Typhoon Discussion and News 2013 and beyond #2267593
    EELightning
    Participant

    Any major upgrades being talked about???

    Yes. P1E has been finalised – release to service will be early/mid ’14, and what Aereo and Scorpion82 have posted a few posts ago. Initial flight trials of Storm Shadow are this year, possibly the back end of this month/early December while SR&J trials are due in the first quarter of ’14. If I understand correctly, BAE Systems will possibly conduct end-to-end firing trials in ’14 also, likely at the Outer Hebrides range due to it being a stand-off weapon. All trials of Storm Shadow will be with two or one weapons configuration.

    There’s quite a bit more information but I’ll keep it back for a later date, soon(ish).

    http://www.eurofighter.com/index.php?eID=tx_cms_showpic&file=uploads%2Fpics%2F5d_01.jpg&md5=3fe728f20917c7966c77f8938a2f574f35d91a9b&parameters[0]=YTo0OntzOjU6IndpZHRoIjtzOjQ6IjgwMG0iO3M6NjoiaGVpZ2h0IjtzOjM6IjYw&parameters[1]=MCI7czo3OiJib2R5VGFnIjtzOjQyOiI8Ym9keSBiZ0NvbG9yPSIjZmZmZmZmIiBz&parameters[2]=dHlsZT0ibWFyZ2luOjA7Ij4iO3M6NDoid3JhcCI7czozNzoiPGEgaHJlZj0iamF2&parameters[3]=YXNjcmlwdDpjbG9zZSgpOyI%2BIHwgPC9hPiI7fQ%3D%3D

    Note: The fittings on the mid/rear fuselage section for the CFTs.

    in reply to: Eurofighter Typhoon Discussion and News 2013 and beyond #2267660
    EELightning
    Participant

    I few snippets of information from Roberto Yanez regarding the Spain’s Typhoon.

    Typhoon’s A/A and A/G capabilities, or missions, have been divided 50/50 in EdA service. A/G weapons comprise the cannon, 150lb (68kg) to 500lb (226kg) free-fall bombs and the GBU-10 and GBU-16 Paveway II laser guided bombs. Integration of the EGBU-16 bomb as well as the capability to self-designate via use of the Litening and infrared search and track is under way. This work, and various other improvements including communications, navigation, defensive aids and the flight control, is due for completion by the end of 2013.

    in reply to: Typhoon Pictures #2267667
    EELightning
    Participant

    As peaceful as a Jedi me like, wor kid! Nae bother, man!

    Geordie… Translated into Poncey Queen’s English: ‘All is good!’

    That Typhoon image was never mean’t to be my Avatar, I couldn’t find the one (not a Typhoon) I was looking for and just stuck with that, couldn’t ar$ed to change it. But, to some Plane Spotters it’s a very early Typhoon, an F2 standard, long before it was re… thingy… I’m too knacked I can’t think of the word… a while before it was FGR4.

Viewing 15 posts - 406 through 420 (of 2,664 total)