dark light

EELightning

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 796 through 810 (of 2,664 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Amazing Weapons Loads – Tornado #2267734
    EELightning
    Participant

    Images of RSAF Tornado with weapons on board aren’t as common as finding RAF, Luftwaffe or Italian Air Force images. But found these:

    http://missilethreat.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/Saudi-Storm-Shadow.png

    http://img74.imageshack.us/img74/9871/saudtorpq3ef4.gif

    And this one…

    http://www.qinetiq.com/what/capabilities/weapons/publishingimages/tornado-bomb-drop-large.jpg

    in reply to: Future of Pakistan AF? #2267905
    EELightning
    Participant

    I could post an image of the Death Star but it wouldn’t prove anything. So how about you try to explain your claims in detail?

    in reply to: Future of Pakistan AF? #2267929
    EELightning
    Participant

    i dont know if jf17 can get aesa but j10b can take on su30mki.
    j10b is like euroopean typhoon but more advance because it has aesa radar first and many hard points and good range.
    j10b with aesa may not come in service as fast as rafael but rafael aesa is limited because the nose is so small and the airplane does not have enough thrust.
    j10b in paf can take on everything in indian af. but when pakfa come out paf need j31 for sure.

    Would you like to explain in greater detail about those claims? In what ways is the J-10B more advanced than Typhoon, how can the J-10B compete with the Su-30MKI, how does the Rafale have insufficient thrust, and how can the J-10B take on everything in the IAF?

    Or are they just narrow minded one liners?

    in reply to: Amazing Weapons Loads – Tornado #2267934
    EELightning
    Participant

    Not against IADS. The Irq defense system was solid. Every partners new that.

    JP.233 are only used for runways, that’s their only purpose. Indeed, their defence system was solid but it still broke. From the RAF’s point of view, their Tornados used ALARM, 1,000lb ‘Dumb’ Bombs and LGBs to take out airfields, bunkers and their defence systems. COMAOs were also underway too.

    http://www.abload.de/img/taurus0tgc.jpg

    http://www.luftwaffe.de/resource/resource/MzEzNTM4MmUzMzMyMmUzMTM1MzMyZTM2MzEzMDMwMzAzMDMwMzAzMDY3NzY2ZTZkMzY2MTYxNzYyMDIwMjAyMDIw/image_large.jpg

    in reply to: F-14 vs Tornado ADV in RAF #2268423
    EELightning
    Participant

    perhaps if they had the f-14 then there would not have been a need to join eurofighter/rafale and UK would make a 5th gen replacement in the 90s-2000s

    F-14, F-15, Tornado ADV… whatever they chose, the UK would have still went the Typhoon path.

    in reply to: The 'JUST A NICE PIC…' thread #2268425
    EELightning
    Participant

    beacuse you post some idiotic stuff like cool awesome. just playing steven im your friend you know we just have fun.

    He was referring to the Vulcan image, pretty obvious really.

    http://www.shropshirelive.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/RAF-Typhoon.jpg

    in reply to: Amazing Weapons Loads – Tornado #2268490
    EELightning
    Participant

    The Iraqi runways needed to be taken out ASAP and there was no other way to do it, nor were there anyone else very keen on doing the mission. Enter the RAF. It wasn’t about being over confident, they knew the risks, they knew what they had to do and they went out and done it with great affect. They get the Brass Balls Award for sure.

    How low can a Tornado get?

    http://www.xvsqnassociation.co.uk/IMAGES/torn-gulf.jpg

    in reply to: The 'JUST A NICE PIC…' thread #2268494
    EELightning
    Participant

    http://i956.photobucket.com/albums/ae41/NG899/FRS1s-ZA176-007-R-ZA191-004-R-etc-0.jpg

    in reply to: The 'JUST A NICE PIC…' thread #2268549
    EELightning
    Participant

    That’s not a Bomber! THIS, is a Bomber! 🙂

    http://www.avrovulcan.org.uk/crown_copyright/317_bs.jpg

    in reply to: Amazing Weapons Loads – Tornado #2268563
    EELightning
    Participant

    Warplane! That’s the one! I can vaguely remember the ten AMRAAM study. I’d say it was just a matter of 4x AMRRAMs and 4xSRAAMs would be sufficient enough for it’s role. It would have been nice to see though.

    http://cdn-www.airliners.net/aviation-photos/photos/5/0/7/1139705.jpg

    Copyright; Duncan Monk. Airliners.net.

    http://i1.wp.com/farm8.staticflickr.com/7195/6848180886_cf4f6f7d7d.jpg?resize=500%2C375

    in reply to: F-14 vs Tornado ADV in RAF #2269046
    EELightning
    Participant

    The real question is, who would you cast to play each part in a British Top Gun?

    It wouldn’t be Tom Cruise…

    He’s a Cocktail maker, a pretty good Cocktail maker too! Until he has a crisis of confidence then he meets a beautiful woman that talks him into being a better Cocktail maker again!

    Then he’s a Race car driver, a pretty good Race car driver too! Until he has a crisis of confidence then he meets a beautiful woman that talks him into being a better Race car driver again!

    Then he’s Samurai Warrior, a pretty good Samurai too! Until he has a crisis of confidence then he meets a beautiful woman that talks him into being a better Samurai Warrior again!

    Then he’s a Brother to an Autistic man, a pretty good Brother to an Autistic man too! Until he has a crisis of confidence then he meets a beautiful woman that talks him into being a better Brother to an Autistic man again!

    Then he’s Fighter Pilot, a pretty good Fighter Pilot too! Until he has a crisis of confidence then he meets a beautiful woman that talks him into being a better Fighter Pilot again!

    – Rich Hall

    …Tom Cruise… the guy’s an ‘effin liability.

    in reply to: MMRCA & F/A-18E/F #2269067
    EELightning
    Participant

    “Is the MRCA Competition still Going On”?

    That’s what this thread is pretty much supposed to be.

    Is the MMRCA Competition still going? No final signature(s) have been made, so yes. Though the aircraft involved are only two types, and the Super Hornet isn’t any of them.

    in reply to: Your Favorite Hornet/Super Hornet pics. #2269071
    EELightning
    Participant

    Just to note: The Spanish Air Force call them EF/A-18s, ‘A’ and ‘B’. Or, C.15 and CE.15.

    in reply to: Amazing Weapons Loads – Tornado #2269073
    EELightning
    Participant

    Which one of these was John Peters and Nichols aircraft?

    The first 17th January. If I may additionally add. When John (Nichol) attempted to release the eight 1,000lb Dumb Bombs (IIRC they chose to release them manually?) they didn’t leave the aircraft when the crew wanted them to, there for they had to dump them into the empty desert soon afterwards. There was a possible malfunction or John seemed to have thought he simply didn’t ‘press the buttons’ hard enough going through the release process. I’ll have to take some notes from their ‘Tornado Down’ book and post them on here.

    in reply to: F-14 vs Tornado ADV in RAF #2269161
    EELightning
    Participant

    I’ve got a lot of books about the RAF’s history, what they have, ordered or even looked at, amongst other general topics. Never heard of them showing interest in the F-14.

    To the general question. The Tornado ADV was just a stop gap until the EAP, or Typhoon as we know it now to be, came online. It’s questionable if it was more cost effective than buying off the shelf F-14s. A different story to operating costs, plus the UK were very much into European collaboration, and the Maiden flight of the F-14 was far from perfect so it was a bullet in the foot.

Viewing 15 posts - 796 through 810 (of 2,664 total)