dark light

EELightning

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 811 through 825 (of 2,664 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: F-14 vs Tornado ADV in RAF #2269168
    EELightning
    Participant

    When did the RAF want to buy the F-14?…

    in reply to: Amazing Weapons Loads – Tornado #2269180
    EELightning
    Participant

    will ADV have meteor?

    Most certainly not. They’re no longer in service, sadly, with the Italian Air Force and the RAF, and they’re being replaced by Typhoon in the RSAF. However, the Tornado F3 has fired Meteor in trials:

    http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8057/8257355999_22ae4e2d76_z.jpg

    http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8352/8258424130_844f364915_z.jpg

    http://www.ainonline.com/sites/default/files/uploads/608-meteor-fired-from-tornado.jpg

    http://www.aereo.jor.br/wp-content/uploads//2012/07/Meteor-BVR-air-to-air-missile-Qinetiq-photo-.jpg

    in reply to: Amazing Weapons Loads – Tornado #2269220
    EELightning
    Participant

    Except that is usage was more or less a suicide mission. JP233 attacks during Desert Storm proved that flying along a runway was not the best idea.

    Not so. Six RAF Tornados were lost during Operation Granby, only one of those aircrafts were JP.233 carriers.

    17 January 1991, an RAF Tornado GR1 was shot down by after delivering 1,000lb ‘Dumb’ bombs at low level. Hit by a SAM, possibly two were fired at the aircraft, second hit.

    On 17 January 1991, RAF Tornado GR1 was lost on a JP.233 sortie. A successful weapons release was made on an Iraqi airfield’s runway, all four aircraft delivered their weapons and headed to their destinations, as the aircraft left the target area another crew member saw an explosion which was one of the Tornados hitting the ground. It seems to be inconclusive as to what caused the crash.

    On 19 January, RAF Tornado GR1 was shot down at low level by a SAM, pre-weapon release. Weapons were 1,000lb ‘Dumb’ bombs.

    On 22 January 1991, RAF Tornado GR1 was lost, a successful attack was made by dropping 1,000lb ‘Dumb’ bombs, but the aircraft was lost shortly afterwards. The leader of the following formation witnessed a fireball erupt in the distance. Closer investigation revealed a series of fires on a hillside to the right of track where the fireball had been. As above, it seems inconclusive as to what caused the crash as the crash sites were inaccessible to the investigation team, several possibilities were made for each incident.

    On 24 January 1991, RAF Tornado GR1 was lost while carrying 1,000lb ‘Dumb’ bombs, initially the pilot’s believed they were hit by a SAM at the moment of weapons release. Conclusions were made that after the investigation fragments from the downed Tornado were found and the Accident Data Recorder was recovered from the wreckage, it was learned that the aircraft loss was caused by an early detonation after release of one, or more, 1,000lb bombs and caused extensive damage to the aircraft.

    On 14 February 1991, RAF Tornado GR1 was shot down by two SAMs, pre-weapons release, while on a medium altitude sortie carrying LGBs.

    Over 100 JP.233s were released on Iraqi Airfields, so around 50 JP.233 sorties providing the two JP.233 pods are classed as ‘one weapon’ on a single Tornado. So, be it 50+ or 100+ JP.233 sorties with just one loss, taking into account of the low level release under heavy AAA and SAM fire (and rather poor communication from the US side regarding “intelligence”), that is a rather outstanding ratio for such a dangerous mission.

    in reply to: Amazing Weapons Loads – Tornado #2269574
    EELightning
    Participant

    I already posted that photo today (post #20) but it seems nobody noticed that.

    My apologies, Niksi. I noticed the post but I thought the WE.177 was a TIALD pod, my mistake.

    http://www.fly-navy.de/jets/tornado10.jpg

    in reply to: Amazing Weapons Loads – Tornado #2269590
    EELightning
    Participant

    If it is then it’s not the most elegant looking formation I’ve seen.

    Eagle, not yet. But found one of an RAF GR1 with a WE.177:

    http://nuclear-weapons.info/images/024-Tornado-loaded.png

    in reply to: Amazing Weapons Loads – Tornado #2269605
    EELightning
    Participant

    RSAF Tornado with 2x Sidewinders and 2x ALARMs.

    http://cdn-www.airliners.net/aviation-photos/photos/7/9/5/1483597.jpg

    Copyright: Garry Ridsdale, Airliners.net.

    in reply to: MMRCA & F/A-18E/F #2269659
    EELightning
    Participant

    India will have no more access with France and than it could with the US or the rest of Western Europe for that matter.

    Boeing and Lockheed Martin weren’t as generous as France regarding ToT and Industrial Benefits. EADS were heavily focused on putting their ‘footprint’ on Indian soil to have a significant presence in the country, in turn Eurofighter GmbH were also willing, and still are willing, to have India as an official 5th member of the programme, this would have opened the door for India to have had opportunities to join other European ventures.

    Boeing and LM would never even contemplate such an offer. The Super Hornet is good, but…

    in reply to: Amazing Weapons Loads – Tornado #2269748
    EELightning
    Participant

    I like the F.3 the best, but found it disappointing to never see the quad Skyflash arrangement with 2200L tanks and twin rails per tank pylon for more Skyflash. And they could have topped it off by adding ASRAAM on the outer pylons.

    Reminded!* I used to have a collection of old Military Aviation magazines I bought in a bundle from a Charity Shop a few years ago, they went from around ’79 to about ’87, not a full collection but there were around 20 copies, I don’t even remember the name of the magazine nor what happened to them. But what I did remember is that they followed the Tornado Programme from prototype of the GR1 and F2 variants up until the last copy I had. One of which that stands out is seeing a report of the Tornado F2 which had images of an early weapons configuration: If I remember correctly the static display had; Four fuselage stationed Skyflash, two 2,200 litre drop tanks, I believe I recall two early versions of the ASRAAM – one per pylon, and I perfectly recall that the aircraft had a 3x ASRAAM launcher (similar to the Brimstone launcher) on each outer wing pylon. It looked very impressive.

    Gutted that I lost them, somehow. Little Goldmines for references.

    Typhoon could have been more focused on A2G with a Tornado F.5 upgrade.

    That wouldn’t have worked. Not for the Tornado anyway. The ADV was just a stretched fuselage of the GR1/4 variant, which was designed to be a low-level delivery platform itself, not optimised for high level supersonic performance like Typhoon was designed to be. The Tornado F3 could have received some new upgrades, possibly even the same engines Typhoon carries, EJ200s. But it wouldn’t have been a Typhoon.

    I do admire the F3 though. It had a knock out punch in it’s latter years…

    http://i30.photobucket.com/albums/c350/JNiemczyk1/Aircraft/43sqnf01.jpg

    in reply to: MMRCA & F/A-18E/F #2269985
    EELightning
    Participant

    I’m not sure Boeing would have been so generous as a European supplier regarding ToT and industrial benefits, but who knows. Besides, Indian officials didn’t seem that impressed with the F/A-18IN (basically what Boeing are promoting now as the “Silent Hornet”) as they were with Rafale or Typhoon, in the technical trials at least. And what they actually bidded with, IN/Silent Hornet, a lot was unknown and hadn’t flown yet, or still hasn’t – with weapons pods, CFTs & what have you.

    in reply to: Amazing Weapons Loads – Tornado #2269987
    EELightning
    Participant

    Four Storm Shadows, four ALARMs…

    http://www.aviation-news.co.uk/archive/media/gr4-d3.jpg

    in reply to: is there a market for USED Gripen and USED Typhoon? #2270041
    EELightning
    Participant

    could Austria and Saudi Arabia also get these upgrades for free?

    I wouldn’t say they’re free, it goes without saying any upgrade and enhancement needs funding for any aircraft. Saudi Arabia and Austria have very different requirements for their Typhoon fleet and they’re about as uncommon as they can get. Whatever the Tranche 1 units will receive, which will be a lot and will have a lot in common with Tranche 2 and 3 units, and whenever Poland wants them by, one can be assured their Typhoons will feature what was previously integrated.

    do you have a source?

    Most of what I’ve said has come from reports in Air Forces Monthly and Combat Aircraft & what have you, as well as snippets from this very forum, such as from Areo on the Typhoon thread regarding Spanish Typhoons. Other things I’d have to ask you to visit Starstreak for a peak. It’s not my place to repeat what was said on there onto here.

    Typhoon option is beginning to look nice.

    Just a pity Poland will select the F-16 due to political reasons. Just my opinion anyway at least.

    in reply to: Dambusters Remake Latest #986987
    EELightning
    Participant

    Yes, not historically accurate at all!!! 🙂

    You liked the? Oh dear… 🙂

    in reply to: Dambusters Remake Latest #986993
    EELightning
    Participant

    I’m not a fan of remakes, although there are some I do like, they’re still outweighed by cr*p ones. Spiderman, Hulk and there’s even a remake of Robocop and the new Superman film isn’t doing much for me going by the Trailers so far but I did like what Nolan has done with the Batman movies. Batman deserved a remake after the awful Val Kilmer and George Clooney ones. But I think the Dambusters will be quite something and it seems as though Jackson and Fry are wanting to keep it historically accurate.

    A few years ago, it seemed as though it’d be a low budget film but with the success of The Lord of the Rings trilogy and the Hobbit, the next two will without a doubt be huge box office hits, Jackson has got a very firm say on what he wants from the film and not what Hollywood wants. And the casting for Gibson and Wallis is perfect. Funnily enough, I was thinking the other day after watching a documentary on the raids that Tom Hollander would make a perfect Guy Gibson.

    Two great actors playing the lead roles, great producer and director in Jackson. And of course our national treasure, Stephen Fry writing.

    Hugh Jackman as Squadron Leader Dave Shannon, anyone?

    http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/e/e5/SUK10670_Dave_Shannon_1943_%28cropped%29.jpg

    in reply to: Amazing Weapons Loads – Tornado #2270106
    EELightning
    Participant

    The OP should tell me if this is a Tornado thread cause i don’t get it. 😡

    Did you miss the bit at the end of ‘Amazing Weapons Loads’…? But yeah, it is a Tornado thread because it says: ‘Amazing Weapons Loads – Tornado’.

    No matter…

    About a multi-role F3. Well, the RAF did (“Unofficially”) have a small fleet of Tornado EF3s…

    http://www.projectoceanvision.com/vox/images/chapter10/f3_alarm.jpg

    in reply to: is there a market for USED Gripen and USED Typhoon? #2270110
    EELightning
    Participant

    so you’re saying if Poland wanted to buy Tranche 1 typhoons, they can get free upgrades to make it a2g compatible with guided munitions and what not

    Only the four Typhoon members (possibly Austria too as they’re interested in some elements for their Typhoons) are funding these upgrades, so if Poland decides to purchase Tranche 1 units for 2017 or beyond, they’ll be with those enhancements and upgrades. As I say, the whole idea of these is so there’s a common fleet of Tranche 1s, 2s and 3s.

Viewing 15 posts - 811 through 825 (of 2,664 total)