dark light

EELightning

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 991 through 1,005 (of 2,664 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Canadian fighter competition #2303400
    EELightning
    Participant

    Denmark are doing what Canada and Japan are doing; inviting others to participate so they can get a better price for the F-35. Personally I wouldn’t give them the satisfaction, why waste any effort for the benefit of others…

    Note: Posted in the wrong thread. Point still stands though.

    in reply to: Do fighter aircrafts need FLIR? #2303402
    EELightning
    Participant

    Reminded*, IIRC, in 1999 there was a TV show on the BBC about general aviation, I think it was called Airshow World(?) or something along those lines, and on one episode there was a feature on BAE Warton where they were testing an IRST system on a Tornado F3. it was linked to the pilot’s helmet. This pilot demonstrated he could put a cover over his visor, in-flight, effectively blinding him though he relies on what the IRST see’s. I remember he demonstrated this at ‘low-level’ and intentionally flying towards the ground and towards objects while the system alerted him. Great stuff. I do wonder if this was R&D for Typhoon’s PIRATE?

    in reply to: Canadian fighter competition #2303510
    EELightning
    Participant

    Loke, you’ve just started and ended a thread with one post. Weldone. 😀

    in reply to: Do fighter aircrafts need FLIR? #2304549
    EELightning
    Participant

    Theres a lot of areas where FLIR can be used; take-off, landing in bad weather be it on land or an aircraft carrier, searching, tracking and identification of targets in A/A and A/G as well as sea targets too. And its quite an inexpensive bit of kit too, compared to the likes of an AESA.

    in reply to: Dumb or what? #2306046
    EELightning
    Participant

    Are you familiar with the Miles M.52, Scooter? Since you think its “Dumb or What” for Russia to hand over technology to China. Work it out for yourself.

    in reply to: General Discussion #248799
    EELightning
    Participant

    Clive was an amazing drummer, very versatile, great talent and was without a doubt difficult to replace but they got an equally great drummer with the bonkers and the nutter of all nutters, Nicko McBrain.

    The Number of the Beast was the very first album I ever bought when I was very young, in single digits, I remember saving up my pocket money for it. Although initally I didn’t really know what I was saving up for, it was just for the cool album cover. I had no idea what kind of music it was or what it sounded like, but when I finally got it it was amazing! My mother said just play it, you might like it! So I did and BOOOOOOOOOM! YES! I was an Iron Maiden fan! Sold my soul to Eddie as you’d say! And of course, all the other albums started to build up!

    Seen them live countless times in all sorts of places and festivals and the special Clive Burr gigs Maiden do every now and then.

    At our Guitar store, most of us our hardcore Maiden fans (I have Iron Maiden written in it’s traditional lettering tattooed down the side of my left Calf) or are at the very least rather fond of them and tomorrow we’re going to have our own little tribute to him in store by having the Iron Maiden, Killers and The Number of the Beast albums he was featured on shuffle/repeat through the working day on the store’s systems.

    in reply to: R.I.P Clive Burr (Iron Maiden) #1847394
    EELightning
    Participant

    Clive was an amazing drummer, very versatile, great talent and was without a doubt difficult to replace but they got an equally great drummer with the bonkers and the nutter of all nutters, Nicko McBrain.

    The Number of the Beast was the very first album I ever bought when I was very young, in single digits, I remember saving up my pocket money for it. Although initally I didn’t really know what I was saving up for, it was just for the cool album cover. I had no idea what kind of music it was or what it sounded like, but when I finally got it it was amazing! My mother said just play it, you might like it! So I did and BOOOOOOOOOM! YES! I was an Iron Maiden fan! Sold my soul to Eddie as you’d say! And of course, all the other albums started to build up!

    Seen them live countless times in all sorts of places and festivals and the special Clive Burr gigs Maiden do every now and then.

    At our Guitar store, most of us our hardcore Maiden fans (I have Iron Maiden written in it’s traditional lettering tattooed down the side of my left Calf) or are at the very least rather fond of them and tomorrow we’re going to have our own little tribute to him in store by having the Iron Maiden, Killers and The Number of the Beast albums he was featured on shuffle/repeat through the working day on the store’s systems.

    in reply to: General Discussion #249671
    EELightning
    Participant

    When someone picks up a very ‘effin expensive, very rare, very exclusive Gibson Les Paul and drops it! Despite having a 12″x12″ sign that has printed on it; ‘PLEASE DO NOT TOUCH! THANK YOU!’ attached to it!

    in reply to: What made you (want to) Swear Today IV? #1848139
    EELightning
    Participant

    When someone picks up a very ‘effin expensive, very rare, very exclusive Gibson Les Paul and drops it! Despite having a 12″x12″ sign that has printed on it; ‘PLEASE DO NOT TOUCH! THANK YOU!’ attached to it!

    in reply to: F-35 debate thread. #2307155
    EELightning
    Participant

    ‘A jack of all trades, a master of none’

    You’ve just opened up the flood gates of Hell, i.e. France, with that!

    in reply to: General Discussion #250117
    EELightning
    Participant

    Regarding IEDs and Tanks. Well, a Land Rover, Jackal, Warrior, Bradley and what have you wouldn’t be any better off if they set one off…

    Tanks still have a place on the battlefield, its just that there are more ways to take out targets than there was, maybe more expensive ways to take out another Tank(?), and not always the best options. There’ll be, well there was, situations where the Tank was the prefered option to take out other armoured units. Air assets do have their problems too, poor weather, availability issues etc.

    in reply to: Tanks ! #1848563
    EELightning
    Participant

    Regarding IEDs and Tanks. Well, a Land Rover, Jackal, Warrior, Bradley and what have you wouldn’t be any better off if they set one off…

    Tanks still have a place on the battlefield, its just that there are more ways to take out targets than there was, maybe more expensive ways to take out another Tank(?), and not always the best options. There’ll be, well there was, situations where the Tank was the prefered option to take out other armoured units. Air assets do have their problems too, poor weather, availability issues etc.

    in reply to: F-35 debate thread. #2307836
    EELightning
    Participant

    Vertical lift thrust would take care of this. Afterall, you have basically no lift from the wing when vertically landing.

    I was thinking more about the external carriage of weapons and drop tanks on the B Variant for when the need arised.

    Since the JSF is an attack jet program and not a fighter jet program, this matters little.

    Nonsense! It matters if you were a partner or an outside buyer that needed the aeroplane to perform A/A sorties. It’d be a very bad selling point if it were up against something like Typhoon.

    Radar blocker as used in the Super Hornet and PAK-FA would do the job.

    You’d need one hell of a radar blocker for this one! Again regarding the B, it’d do little to no good.

    The F-32 A&C would be entering IOC today at the flyaway cost of under $70 million, regardless of what happened to the F-32B. Boeing structured its JSF program as such that the A&C and B were separate airframes, and one’s trouble would not spill over to the other.

    Unfortunately, we’ll never know if Boeing’s roadmap was as effective as they claimed.

    in reply to: General Discussion #250537
    EELightning
    Participant

    I bet £20 in the not too distant future, there’ll be complaints because Jeremy Clarkson and James May offend someone because they took the p*ss out of Richard Hammond’s height. Like what happened tonight:

    James May on Hammond being knighted: ‘Arise, Sir Richard Hammond!… Oh? You already have.’ lol

    in reply to: A new word we can't use… #1848872
    EELightning
    Participant

    I bet £20 in the not too distant future, there’ll be complaints because Jeremy Clarkson and James May offend someone because they took the p*ss out of Richard Hammond’s height. Like what happened tonight:

    James May on Hammond being knighted: ‘Arise, Sir Richard Hammond!… Oh? You already have.’ lol

Viewing 15 posts - 991 through 1,005 (of 2,664 total)