“Just accept it”…
While conveniently forgetting reports from a Luftwaffe Typhoon pilot (and RAF pilot respectively?) stating something along the lines of, ‘Typhoon had excess thrust which gave it an advantage’ and, ‘The higher Typhoon got the better it was suited’…
Some people ought to have a wider view of perspective in life. One gets more of an idea.
And who says that Typhoon scored worse during this specific test?
Its from one of those mysterious sources that never reveals to anyone other than a select few.
:rolleyes:
Thanks for the laugh.
BAeS have done some work on a Naval Typhoon to compete with Rafale M, but as always with Typhoon, it’s achilles is price.
As always? Last time I checked the Typhoon has 2 exports one of which with 48-71 additional orders likely to be signed, a more or less done deal in Oman of around 20 units, UAE dropped Rafale because of too high a cost and apparantly Typhoon being cheaper in the UAE and Switzerland, less than 5% more expensive as was reported for Typhoon Tranche 3 in India and apparantly, France pay more for their Rafales than the UK do for their Typhoons. Nah, as always, Rafale’s Achilles Heel is price. The same can hardly be said for the Typhoon.
Wrt to this news. As much as I’d like to see Rafale in Royal Naval service, I don’t believe for a moment it’d happen. A fine aircraft but it comes at a high price and adding on top of that the intergration of systems that the British would use, and as we know, Dassault are happy of selling their product at a price but aren’t that keen on making it suitable for a potential customers requirements. *Cough* UAE *Cough-Cough* And what of the RAF? Would us British pay more for a bunch of Rafales or would we rather, for example, order a few more Typhoons at a cheaper price and create more British jobs? I’d fancy the latter.
As for the F/A-18…Well, *yawn*…Again, a capable, fine, fair priced aircraft but it’s getting a bit long in the tooth now, ain’t it. Then again, this is just ‘interim’ so maybe it’d be fine just for that.
Actually, I just had a better idea! Which shed did we put those Harriers again, I’ll go have a look. *Opens shed door and thinks* ‘Oh yeah…Bollox!’ :rolleyes:
Well, we have different views about such things so it’s probably best to leave it at that rather than dragging counter arguements along for pages on end. But at the end of the day, the Naval Typhoon has been on the drawing boards for over decade so someone must be convinced it could work, someone with greater minds than yours or mine.
Reluctant to field upgrades? P1E upgrades due any time now which are a major boost for multi/swing-role capabilities as well as for other sub-systems, other A/G weapons likely to follow soon afterwards as will P2E, HEA in operational service since October ’11, Captor-E ready for operational service in 2015 as will be Meteor. Late? Maybe, but the Typhoon of today is very much a different beast of 2008 & as it shows, it’s not just the case of adding more A/G weapons or an AESA radar, its the little things that make up a bigger picture.
Wouldn’t feel very comfortable landing on a ship at post/pre-stall speed relying on FCS and TVC? Those aren’t the only things one would have to rely on on a Naval Typhoon. Of course, the TVNs will need to be very reliable as you say, but the same still stands for other naval aircraft even TVNs, you’d better be sure the engines and other systems are very reliable because the slightest error would end you up in the drink. The same safety standards still stand and whats different doesn’t mean it won’t work. Besides, TVNs aren’t exactly new, the Harrier uses the same technique albeit to a different approach & it works just fine.
On a slightly seperate note; the TVN’s can be seen as a safety feature, couldn’t they not?
Wrt CFTs, why would they affect Typhoon’s performance any more than three external drop tanks which hold the same amount of fuel?
‘C’ in CFT standing for ‘Conformal’, meaning they’re built partially into the airframe which in turn reduces drag and are more efficient than having three drop tanks on three hardpoints. Yes, you still have the weight of 3,000+ litres onboard but you’ve done away with those bulky drop tanks, which in any case weren’t much of a hindrance on Typhoon’s performance anyway.
Theres a few reasons you’ll find by doing a little bit of research regarding why a Naval Typhoon has TVNs – a couple of which you’ll find that they decrease landing speeds and improve angles of approach, thus improving the pilot’s visibility. At one point, BAE Systems thought of fitting a ‘mini-cam’ on top of the canopy’s frame to give the pilot a better view, but some other boffin thought, ‘Well, why not use TVNs instead? Here are the reasons; blah, blah, blah…Plus, benefits for take-off/landing weights and in flight capabilities!’ Very simple theory without having going through the hassle of fitting a ‘mini-cam’ or changing the shape of it’s nose, isn’t it.
There, just saved a few more pages of bellowing. :rolleyes:
Once again…And again, Typhoon was designed from the beginning to be multi/swing-role albeit weighted more towards A/A as most other multi/swing-role fighters are. Theres no reasons why Typhoon can’t perform deep strike sorties, many people claim it wasn’t designed to or can’t do such roles without backing their claims up. Of course, it might not carry the most fuel when compared to others but what it does, or be able to carry isn’t what one would call lacking neither. With two CFTs and a single centre drop tank onboard it adds up to 4,000 litres external/conformal plus 5t internal then you’ve got 12 stations for weapons, six A/A and six plus for A/G: i.e. for the latter; two Storm Shadows and up to eight SDBs that have a range of approx 50+ miles and a hell of a lot more for the former. Add to that it’s A/A capabilities, Captor-E, HEA, DASS and other systems etc. With those in place, it’s hardly lacking.
Or, why not Scotland just sticks with a proper air force. I.e. the RAF. Or better still, just stay at being a country.
I’ll get my coat I think* :diablo:
It may be that the Mirages are now due a major overhaul or something along those lines.
Or, Brazil checked out how much India paid for their Mirage upgrades & thought; ‘To Hell with that!’
Before I would’ve said the Rafale has a very high chance in Brazil, but if exports would be of any help of securing a deal, by better offers etc, then things would seem to look a little shaky for this fighter, especially if recent reports coming out of the Middle East are anything to go by. Theres word going about via Arabian Aerospace & Tactical Report that the Rafale is excluded from consideration from Qatar and the UAE:
“Crown Prince of Qatar Sheikh Tamim Bin Hamad Al Thani is said to be ruling out the possibility of Qatar entering in serious talks with France to buy the Rafale aircraft.”
“The General Staff of the UAE Air Force (UAEAF) is said to be proposing to limit the talks on plans to buy new fighter jets to the F-15, F-16 and Eurofighter Typhoon.”
Apparantly, Oman and Typhoon are more or less done, its now just a matter of going through details & making sure everything is fine.
But personally speaking wrt Brazil. I believe the Gripen NG could get a hold of this deal.
We’ll find out on the 24th January next week….Apparantly.
I’ve only heard of TVNs being offered to India on the Naval Typhoon for the IN. Not for the IAF. Not heard of any Typhoon Tranche 3s coming with TVNs for the MMRCA.
Wether they actually have been proposed as part of Tranche 3 for India, who knows.
India has no timetable for the hotly awaited decision to award its $11 billion fighter jet deal, a defence ministry official said on Friday, and he denied reports that the government had contacted the constructors.
“We don’t know when the announcement is going to happen, so there is no point speculating when it will happen,” the official, who did not wish to be named, told Reuters.
Earlier this week some sections of the Indian media carried a report that the Eurofighter Typhoon may have emerged as the lowest bidder and that representatives of the contractors would have been called by the defence ministry on Thursday.
The official said that no representative of any company had been called by the government.
But the official didn’t say anything about the Typhoon being the lowest bidder? Interesting…