dark light

GDL

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 166 through 180 (of 1,255 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: The great man himself. #1553590
    GDL
    Participant

    Yes, it’s Willy. 🙂

    A dedication from one of my favourite aviation artists.

    http://www.brooksart.com/Dragons.jpg

    in reply to: The great man himself. #1554024
    GDL
    Participant

    Clue: He is German.

    in reply to: missile classes #2057465
    GDL
    Participant

    i was thinking is there any difference in the types and ranges of medium range ballistic missiles and intermediate range ballistic missiles or are they one and the same thing? i remember back in the 80s when the americans Pershing 2 and the soviet SS-20s was scrapped, werent they IRBMs?

    This page will help: http://www.fas.org/nuke/intro/missile/basics.htm

    The Soviet SS-20 was a very flexible fully mobile system. Far more so than the Pershing II. The biggest concern for the Soviets and the Pershing II however, was it’s accuracy, especially against hardened targets. A CEP of only 30m with an active radar guided warhead made it very formidable.

    The SS-20 on the other hand could be fired as a short-range weapon (500km) and a intermediate-range weapon (up to 5,000km). The Pershing II had a max. range of only 1,770km.

    in reply to: Russian SSBN question #2072626
    GDL
    Participant

    My guess is Karelia and it is a DELTA IV. No idea what it is doing though.

    in reply to: Pictures, news and speculation thread #2649063
    GDL
    Participant

    well, the point is you dont hone any sort of useful skill like that. the scenario in pitch black might be unrealistic, but the skills practiced and the tactics tried are. thats the point of exerises. but can you think of any meaningful skills one can gain from manually guiding a missile to such a target?

    manual targeting for missiles is just basicly an excerise in keeping the target in the crosshairs long enough for your missile to hit or get into its seeker range. not very difficilt with a great big huge smoketrail like that and with the target flying in pretty much a straight line. hardly justifies the cost involved. (remeber we are talking about a navy that straps AK47s onto AAA guns for basic gunery practice)

    if they were training for manual targeting, then there is no need for a smoke generator as no real missile from any remotely modern navy would have a tail anything like that big. the skills they should be practicing is visually locating and tracking an incoming missile without a smoketrail at all. again, not that difficult for trained naval personnel if you know where and when its coming.

    both are possible, just one is more likely then the other. 😉

    I’ll admit it does look like a publicity stunt/exercise. But manual systems operation could easily be required if the supporting fire control systems for the missiles has been knocked out due to whatever reason/damage. The likelyhood of that kind of total systems damage I think is low to slim, but the skills required to handle all aspects of the contingency including command, in that case, are very relevant.

    GDL
    Participant

    Hey, I love a challenge!!

    in reply to: The great man himself. #1554105
    GDL
    Participant

    What about this guy?

    in reply to: Narcos aircraft for the FAE #2649771
    GDL
    Participant

    Ok, I am assuming the US of A was the primary destination? Could the HS 125-400 make it to the USA from Ecquador?

    in reply to: soviet-russian engines #2649806
    GDL
    Participant

    I think Jet Engines: Fundamentals of Theory, Design and Operation by Klaus Hunecke, would make a good companion to Gunston’s work.

    in reply to: Drainage pipings or what???? #2057487
    GDL
    Participant

    As the family car goes by

    Young Child: Mum, what are those things on the truck?
    Mother: Hmm, not sure. Could be pipes?
    Young Child: You mean like pipes we have at home?
    Mother: Kind of.
    Young Child: Could they be canisters for long range surface to air missiles?
    Mother: {blank stare} ………??????

    🙂

    in reply to: Models #2072724
    GDL
    Participant

    I’ll get back to you Ja when I start building them again. I have not done any now for 8 years.

    in reply to: Twin-engined Fighters: Quiz time! #1554931
    GDL
    Participant

    You are welcome Rankl! You did great with this quiz. I will be cooking up another one soon enough.

    in reply to: Military Air Demo Teams Question #2649836
    GDL
    Participant

    Here’s a closer look at the first one, perhaps the markings are clearer . . .

    Well, much better, close up! If I had seen that serial clearly I would have known they were -As, not -Cs. But I worked it out anyway. 🙂

    in reply to: Lancaster: The capital ship bomb variant #1554944
    GDL
    Participant

    Was it designed to penetrate the upper deck and wreck the lower decks? It doesn’t look like a pure armour penetrator like the 3,000lb German Fritz-X.

    in reply to: Surface warfare #2072738
    GDL
    Participant

    Jonesy, I have found trying to debate anything on or around Chinese capabilities today often attracts a lot of flak, and not always for purely technical reasons.

    It is a very sensitive subject to certain members here. I avoid it where I can, which is why I didn’t continue along with you on this one. Good luck. But, personally, I have better things to do with my time.

Viewing 15 posts - 166 through 180 (of 1,255 total)