Thanks Papa Lima! Got to get more Putnam books in my collection. Any other details on the bomb itself? Size?
Ok, I will give it to you. It is the Romano R-110.
No.3 is the Rockwell XFV-12 exprimental VTOL fighter design.
No.4 is the Boeing XB-15.
No.2 is the Avro Arrow.
Checked, and I think the F-15s are actually F-15As. They have ANG 102nd FW/101st FS markings, and that unit operates F-15As.
Do they have proper isolated air strips to operate regional jets like this??? If so, then they are better equipped than I ever thought.
My god, has this debate ceased??
I guess it’s possible by now to have reverse-engineered the J85, but they have had two decades plus to tinker with the Tomcat too. Could it be more of a mass production cost matter to go for a modified F-5, as opposed to a modified F-14?
North Korea have said today it was a large planned demolition, apparently for a hydro-electric plant.
There’s the problem, I don’t have decent access to a lot of the Russian-language stuff 😀
But would you then need someone to translate it for you Sean? :p
The main straps are tied to the drop tanks. Any signifigance in that?
Haven’t seen the profile, but didn’t the Tallboy-armed IX & 617 sqn aircraft used against the Tirpitz have specially modified bombays? Could well be one of these.
The Tirpitz bomber from No.9 Sqn looks similar with a similar bomb bay, but the maritime special is from No.106 Sqn; Admiral Prune (W4118). It was one of only six aircraft modified for the Capital Ship Bomb.
The Yak-141 crash was attributed to pilot error. Any details on the investigation that followed?
doesnt really hold water or make sence.
there might be smoke generators, but if that is the case. then its most likely for the benefit of any high ranking military and/or political figures present to inspect the test fires, and not for the crew to aim at.
with modern radar and computers, the ship can plot an intercept path and give mid-course guidence to the missile much more accurately and faster then mere mortals like us.
it also dont make sence for the crew to train for situations that will never happen in real life.
For crying out loud, I am speculationg on a picture! Besides, how the do you know for sure? They might be practising a manual interception with pure line-of-sight guidance (is that a capability on the PLAN Jiangwei-class frigates? If not, I am wrong).
it also dont make sence for the crew to train for situations that will never happen in real life.
But there is nothing wrong with honing skills is there. Take the RAAF for example. They train with allies in Exercise Pitch Black for an aerial assualt on Northern Australia. Indeed an unlikely real life scenario. But they still do it, every two years. Just because a scenario would seem to be unrealistic, doesn’t mean the skills attributed with dealing with it are redundant. And as for that real life situation? I think a missile getting that close to a ship in wartime is a VERY realistic situation especially for the less capable PLAN vessels.
OTOH, it could just be an exercise beefed up with pyrotechnics to impress the brass.