dark light

TR1

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 7,651 through 7,665 (of 9,195 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Russian Space & Missile[ News/Discussion] Part- 4 #1796630
    TR1
    Participant

    270km. For a system that old it is impressive.:eek:

    Why restrict themselves to Yakhont now? Why not a coastal SSM system with Granit/Vulkan?:diablo:

    Weight. Size. At least that is what comes to mind.

    in reply to: Russian Space & Missile[ News/Discussion] Part- 4 #1796635
    TR1
    Participant

    Trident you are a god.

    But seriously, good eyes.

    in reply to: MiG-29 Fulcrum #2310907
    TR1
    Participant

    After this upgrade will Poland offer their own MiG-29 upgrade package??
    When we talk about copying, most of the people point their fingers at Russia or China. But Poland have been one of the biggest copycat living off with all the “modified” Soviet systems and at the same time bitching about Russia.

    That Polish upgrade isn’t even worth of being called an upgrade. More like a kapremont and slight overhaul.

    in reply to: Russian Navy Thread #2033597
    TR1
    Participant

    **** Shtil on 22350. I will eat my hat if that ever happens.

    in reply to: PAK FA episodeⅩⅧ #2310939
    TR1
    Participant

    No offence, but I don’t need expert knowledge or mega-eyeball-radars to be able to tell that the underbody would have a lower RCS if those bumps and bulgers caused by the engine intakes were flattened out and filled in for a uniform, rectangular underside.;)

    It may be that the present shape already has low enough RCS to be able to compete with the Raptor or JSF already. But that doesn’t mean there isn’t further room for improvement.

    Can we honestly stop questioning Sukhoi’s competence through eyeballing? Do you really, REALLY think Sukhoi wouldn’t have lowered RCS if there were such obvious areas for improvement?

    It is getting old. I guarantee, 100%, if the PAK-FA was matte black half of this questioning wouldn’t even be around.

    Honestly people…

    EDIT: Also, like Flateric said, look at cost effectiveness. Pointless “marble-sized” RCS figures that have no bearing on actual combat conditions, not to mention maintenance, production cost….hell the damn thing isn’t even flying half the time. Somehow I think Sukhoi took a goooood look at the F-22s woes…

    in reply to: PAK FA episodeⅩⅧ #2311334
    TR1
    Participant

    Actually, the most reliable info is def on Russian forums, at least when talking about Russian mil. If anything, they are annoyingly depressive at times, but info is phenomenal.

    in reply to: Should Australia had invested in India's AMCA? #2311556
    TR1
    Participant

    British occupation of India was as much the fault of Indians as of the British.

    The hell does this mean?

    in reply to: Russian Aviation thread, part V #2311565
    TR1
    Participant

    Su-34 has passed government testing!

    Documents being finalized, 2012 will be accepted for service.

    in reply to: PAK FA episodeⅩⅧ #2311647
    TR1
    Participant

    Does that mean no flat nozzles/IR reduction methods? (Please don’t answer just “yes” or “no” 🙂 )

    Ofc there will be.

    Those are not final nozzles.

    EDIT:

    Dammit, I still want a good photo series of the 1.44. That is like a holy grail for me, along with Su-47.

    in reply to: Russian Aviation thread, part V #2311649
    TR1
    Participant

    http://russianplanes.net/images/to55000/054714.jpg

    in reply to: Info req on kh 31AD varient of krypton missile #1796678
    TR1
    Participant
    in reply to: Russian Navy Thread #2033693
    TR1
    Participant

    That’s why I said export-versions of 22350: building on the commonality in systems, but on a different platform. Then later, switch platform altogether and move on to new ssystems (i.e. ‘non export’ 22350)

    How about doing the opposite- 11356 hull and weapon systems from 22350?

    in reply to: Russian Navy Thread #2033696
    TR1
    Participant

    Sovs are in bad shape and expensive to refit, powerplant and all…Udaloys are in pretty good shape all in all.

    http://img405.imageshack.us/img405/3678/166889598.jpg

    Varyag!

    EDIT;
    http://balancer.ru/forum/punbb/attachment.php?item=241072&download=1
    Volk! How is that for a photo, talk about severe climate.

    http://balancer.ru/forum/punbb/attachment.php?item=241258&download=1
    Gepard back in 06.

    in reply to: Russian Aviation thread, part V #2312079
    TR1
    Participant
    in reply to: Russian Aviation thread, part V #2312101
    TR1
    Participant

    Is that actually happening though? This was reported a while ago, and as gar as I know the aircraft are still on a ramp in India somewhere.

Viewing 15 posts - 7,651 through 7,665 (of 9,195 total)