dark light

TR1

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 8,536 through 8,550 (of 9,195 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: JASDF F-2 Deployment #2322614
    TR1
    Participant

    From pure aesthetics, the F-2 is a masterpiece. Even better looking than F-16, especially in those JASDF colors.

    in reply to: Russian Aviation News – Part the Fourth #2322712
    TR1
    Participant

    http://www.airforce.ru/photogallery/melihov/su-24m/aleksandr_melihov_su-24m_1200.jpg

    in reply to: Indian AF News and Discussion Part 16. #2322723
    TR1
    Participant

    I know that TR1 , I am not blaming Gromov.:)
    I had the idea (somehow) that the trials have progressed quite a lot , but disappointed to find out that quite a bit is still left.

    Oh I didn’t mean to imply you were blaming them, its just the translation (auto?) seemed unclear as to why they paused, so I thought I’d clear it up.

    in reply to: Indian AF News and Discussion Part 16. #2323054
    TR1
    Participant

    The pause is because they are waiting for more engines from India.

    “По его словам, пауза в испытаниях связана с ожиданием поступления нескольких новых экземпляров двигателя в институт.”

    in reply to: Russian Aviation News – Part the Fourth #2323058
    TR1
    Participant

    http://russianplanes.net/images/to39000/038831.jpg

    in reply to: Russian Space & Missile[ News/Discussion] Part- 4 #1798387
    TR1
    Participant

    Interesting, since Genshtab recently said the Patriots in Poland do not threaten the Russian nuclear arsenal, and hence they don’t have a problem with it.

    in reply to: Russian Space & Missile[ News/Discussion] Part- 4 #1798391
    TR1
    Participant

    Indeed. If these numbers are to be believed, the declared “strategic” importance of this project (new plant) to St. Petersburg makes more sense.

    http://arms-tass.su/?page=article&aid=93274&cid=24

    in reply to: Russian Space & Missile[ News/Discussion] Part- 4 #1798393
    TR1
    Participant

    Yeah, the big question now is production capability. 56 battalions is 448 launchers. O.O indeed. There are currently 36 launchers in service.

    EDIT: My math was bad. 32 launchers.

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode XVI #2323999
    TR1
    Participant

    I would guess they’re refering to the Su-27M “710”.

    Yeah no doubt, brain freeze on my part. 😮

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode XVI #2324092
    TR1
    Participant

    http://www.armstass.su/?page=article&aid=93423&cid=25

    This article mentions over 40 T-50-1 flights, 2 T-50-2 flights, and 32 flights on a Su-27 flying laboratory. I wonder if that includes the Su-35 engine testbeds used in the program.

    in reply to: B-1 Bomber with AAMs (Missile Mothership) Rand concept #2324096
    TR1
    Participant

    F22 don’t got the range. F22 don’t have the deep belly.

    Not to mention dropping the bombs would potential lead to the aircraft being detected…there are systems that can shoot down the SDB as well, but that’s another story

    in reply to: Russian Space & Missile[ News/Discussion] Part- 4 #1798426
    TR1
    Participant

    http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/generic/story_channel.jsp?channel=defense&id=news/awst/2011/03/07/AW_03_07_2011_p32-293478.xml&headline=Russian%20Long-Range%20Air%20Defense%20Efforts%20Bloom

    Very nice if this actually materializes. The money is there, the question now is production capability- the new Almaz-Antei factory makes sense now.

    Given how AF is inevitably decreasing in size, AD will remain critical partner in defending airspace.

    in reply to: Russian Navy News & Discussion, Part III #2009239
    TR1
    Participant

    Cheeky thing to say.:D I have to say, the Ukrainians are getting sorely shafted here. They spent hundreds of millions of their own money building the cruiser. If Russia needs it(and it does, if it thinks overhauling the Kirovs and the other Slavas is important) then it should pay for it. Telling them to give it away for free and then ‘waiting for an acceptable offer’ is BS.

    The orange revolution and Ukraine’s friendship with Europe has been criticised, but they certainly stood to gain more than what they’ve been getting from Russia nowadays. Having a pro-Russian government hasn’t done them much good.

    First of all, the Ukranians have not done any work on the ship for years- all it has done is degraded since USSR fell, and is now an outdated rustbucket that would need complete overhaul to make workable. Money is FAR better spent on other projects…the 95% figure is as hilarious as it is misleading. The Russian response is 100% correct, no freebies here.

    Second, having a pro-Russian government has been more succesfull than the Oranges. For one gas isn’t being shut off, more favorable prices have been reached on Russian energy deliveries to the nation, joint projects (aviation for example) actually have a chance at succeeding now, etc etc. Dialogue between two nations actually is at a normal level, and Ukraine stands to gain from that- because it is in a poor state indeed.

    All the Oranges accomplished was bankrupt the country, make big international debts while accomplishing nothing, bring relationship with bigger and most important neighbor to utter ****…just look how many votes Ushenko got, should tell you a lot.

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode XVI #2324270
    TR1
    Participant
    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode XVI #2324732
    TR1
    Participant

    Well, in terms of numbers it certainly was the mainstay. Where it was deemed insuficiant, the USSR developed specialist aircraft.

Viewing 15 posts - 8,536 through 8,550 (of 9,195 total)