+3 makes a two-seater:
[ATTACH=CONFIG]230661[/ATTACH]
From an AD-1 with oblique wing to an AD-4 with folded wings:

A single bed:
[ATTACH=CONFIG]230592[/ATTACH]
The Connie was regarded as the world’s best tri-motor, so I’m afraid that’s still a four-engine plane then! :highly_amused:
Re-engined B-17:
[ATTACH=CONFIG]230563[/ATTACH]
Two Spitfires taking off at this year’s Flying Legends airshow. Photo by yours truly.

That’s the one! Back to you 🙂
They have T-birds there too:
[ATTACH=CONFIG]230512[/ATTACH]
As I’m confident I got it right, I hope RAB won’t mind me putting up the next pic. Vaguely similar again!
[ATTACH=CONFIG]230441[/ATTACH]
The tail section in the foreground belongs to an Me 210! Cool photo!
The sad remains of the Dutch Lynx that was captured by Libya:
[ATTACH=CONFIG]230432[/ATTACH]
Arthur Sack As 6 V1
I once started creating a 3D model of that one, but never completed it: http://digitalaviationart.com/skyraider3d/as6v1_1wip.htm
Trumper, the model I make is fully three-dimensional and can be viewed from any angle and any focal length. Like portrait photographers, who use a slightly narrower angle than the human eye (to closer represent our actual focal area), I tend to use portrait lenses for my work. Anywhere from 70-135 mm typically. Of course it depends on the image, sometimes a wide angle works well too.
Thanks Geoff! I particularly like the close-up of that Red Arrow. Very well done!
The Whirlwind stuff is very cool, I particularly like the first set of retro posters!
Deskpilot, orthogonal view/projection is another word for it, I use it a lot. The 2-point perspective isn’t very pretty I find, though some masterful artwork was made with it. Think M.C. Esher. As long as you crop off the outer zones, it’s pretty acceptable.
I was on my way to the GAvA exhibit this morning, when a jumper at Wimbledon cut my journey short 🙁
I hope I’ll get another chance later this week, though of course most the painters won’t be there then. I’d hoped to meet a few friends today whom I’ve not seen for a long time.
Spot on. Over to you!
Though not really artwork, maybe of interest: a quick experiment with a blueprint-style isometric projection:

Without blueprint effects it looks like this:

Those who wonder why the left wing is so short… it isn’t, it’s the result of the projection, which is perspective-less. Hence “near” parts look smaller than “far” parts. They’re actually identical, except the wings appear not equal due to the dihedral. More about iso projections here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isometric_projection
And some snippets of the line drawing:


These are all created using the same 3D model that I created for the cover art, profile illustrations and line drawings for Osprey Publication’s Ki-27 ‘Nate’ Aces, by Nicholas Millman. For more artwork of the Ki-27, please see my website at http://digitalaviationart.com/skyraider3d/nate_1.htm or click any of the thumbnails below: