dark light

Skyraider3D

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 691 through 705 (of 1,265 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Balkenkreuz/Swastika Dimensions #1236348
    Skyraider3D
    Participant

    Sorted! 😉

    NB. That info was already in the Luftarchiv.de link I posted earlier 🙂

    in reply to: AR501 Photo Needed #1241847
    Skyraider3D
    Participant

    LOL 🙂

    in reply to: AR501 Photo Needed #1241287
    Skyraider3D
    Participant

    I’ve got a few too. Drop me a note if interested.

    http://skyraider3d.military-meshes.com/skyraider/photos/aircraft/ow050807_01.jpg
    cropped from:
    http://skyraider3d.military-meshes.com/skyraider/photos/aircraft/ow050807_28.jpg

    http://skyraider3d.military-meshes.com/skyraider/photos/aircraft/ow040911_18.jpg

    This one was taken at 1/20th of a second on a cloudy evening:
    http://skyraider3d.military-meshes.com/skyraider/photos/aircraft/ow050924_01.jpg

    I have some in-flight shots too, but not handy right now.

    in reply to: Looking for 165 "Ceylon" Squadron Spitfire Codes #1241290
    Skyraider3D
    Participant
    in reply to: Forum Virtual Art Gallery #1241411
    Skyraider3D
    Participant

    I’m glad you posted, Mal, that’s pretty good indeed!

    in reply to: Forum Virtual Art Gallery #1241490
    Skyraider3D
    Participant

    That forest view is a great concept, Paul!

    in reply to: Looking for 165 "Ceylon" Squadron Spitfire Codes #1241678
    Skyraider3D
    Participant

    Thanks very much for your reply. It helps a bit, as at least we can discount a few possible aircraft letters now 🙂

    in reply to: Balkenkreuz/Swastika Dimensions #1241846
    Skyraider3D
    Participant

    The dimensions of the various markings on Luftwaffe aircraft are well documented. Are you interested in any types in particular?

    Here’s some stuff to get you started: http://www.luftarchiv.de/index.htm?/flugzeugbau/kenungen.htm

    in reply to: Bader shot down not a mid air wth a 109? #1242141
    Skyraider3D
    Participant

    The answer is simple: too often.
    44 pages of misery and counting: http://forum.12oclockhigh.net/showthread.php?t=2670

    in reply to: Kemble Air Day – £25 per head – is this expensive? #1242157
    Skyraider3D
    Participant

    Have you looked at the cost of getting a 2+2 family into any other “all day” attractions – Legoland, Chessington World of Adventures, Alton Towers etc etc?

    They’re expensive too! 😀

    Dora Jar makes a fair point that it’s a show with something for everyone, which is true.

    However what I personally don’t like to pay for a show that is predominantly filled with any combination of the following:
    -Tornado display
    -Hawk display
    -Tucano display
    -Harrier display
    -Eurfighter
    -Chinook display
    -Blue Eagles
    -Red Arrows
    Unless I am mistaken, these display are mostly paid for by our defence tax money and I don’t fancy paying for them twice. So I am not keen to pay £25 show that contains a substantial amount of the above and the last time I went to Kemble at least half of these displays were present, if I remember correctly. If I want to see this stuff (and most of it I do enjoy!), I’ll just go to one of the sea side displays, which are free.

    That said, I am fully prepared to pay a fair sum for truly expensive displays, like historic jets and warbird shows. But for those I prefer to go to the more dedicated shows. For example when I see 30+ warbirds idling before me in the Duxford grass, ready to take off for a Balbo, then I realise I’m getting my 30-quid’s worth.

    I hope it all makes a little sense 🙂

    in reply to: How Low Can You Go?? #1242410
    Skyraider3D
    Participant

    Ah yes that one with the Yak – a classic! Lucky escape it was! 😮

    in reply to: Kemble Air Day – £25 per head – is this expensive? #1242417
    Skyraider3D
    Participant

    Yes it’s expensive. I guess I’ve been spoiled as a kid though, as I used to go to the Dutch Air Force open days and they’re totally free and offer superb quality and variety.
    I’ve been to Kemble a few years ago but didn’t find it a particularly exciting event. Some nice classic jets, yes, but also a lot of things I don’t care for. Just another mass entertainment airshow, I reckon.
    You’ll find me on Old Warden this summer 😀 😉

    in reply to: How Low Can You Go?? #1242743
    Skyraider3D
    Participant

    im sorry about the amount of posts ive made recently, but this has got to be the mother of all close encounters low level or otherwise!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!:eek: 😮 😮 😮 😮 😮 😮 😮 😮

    Hmm that video doesn’t work anymore unfortunately…

    Anyway, I found this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sPmWkf1NsXM

    This pilot has a little too much fun…
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QgziZs5GUvQ
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rYfhC9ft_hk
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BWdDHGEMQ2Q
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CVIAiy-LNvs

    in reply to: CA-15 Kangaroo and Lincoln bomber over Melbourne #1246594
    Skyraider3D
    Participant

    Thanks Mark.

    Attached a picture of my reworked CA-15 model as it currently stands. I still need to add the pilot and propeller and perhaps a Lincoln as well! 😉

    in reply to: CA-15 Kangaroo and Lincoln bomber over Melbourne #1251764
    Skyraider3D
    Participant

    Thanks for the excellent information, Mark! The test pilot’s comments were very interesting. It’s a shame production was delayed till the point where it was too late, but I guess we should be thankful the CA-15 was at least built and flown.

    Ah, yes I’ve seen the 1/6th scale model before and especially the last shot is utterly convincing!

    The marvellous head-on shot from the Lincoln, while flying over Melbourne and piloted by Lee Archer (this may give a clue as to the date, as the CA-15 flight log has survived somewhere I believe – can’t remember which book it was published in though but either way I don’t have it) can be found in Wings of Fame #4, page 119. It shows the red dots in the roundels so it must have been in 1948 or later.

    One feature of the CA-15 has puzzled me for awhile now and that’s the gun ports. It was never armed but from some photos there do appear to be gunports with something(???) in them, while on others they’re not visible at all and in the head-on shot they appear to be covered (tape? puty?). None of the photos I have seen show the spent shell ejection openings in the bottom wing, but I assume these were there as well. Can you or James confirm?

Viewing 15 posts - 691 through 705 (of 1,265 total)