dark light

Skyraider3D

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 946 through 960 (of 1,265 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: What Lens? #465519
    Skyraider3D
    Participant

    Sure! Just go to an airshow next summer and try πŸ™‚
    You might find that 300mm on a 35mm camera isn’t always sufficient, but why not try an Old Warden show – there it’s definitely enough!

    in reply to: What Lens? #465527
    Skyraider3D
    Participant

    Before i was having to go 1/800 to 1/1000 sec to avoid slight movement blur, now i am confidently going down to 1/500.

    Generally 1/500th is still a bit too fast for propeller aircraft. As a general rule I try to stick to a maximum of…
    1/400th for two-bladed props
    1/320th for multi-bladed props
    1/250th for helicopters
    The speed relates to the rotation speed of the prop/rotor and going higher than these speeds will make your props/rotors look rather motionless and takes the action out of the image.

    in reply to: digital vs film #465672
    Skyraider3D
    Participant

    Well sure it depends on your needs. But by simply looking through this forum I assume Mixtec is after airshow photography.

    As for nightscenes, nothing could be better than digital as it allows you endless attempts with shutterspeed etc, without wasting any film.
    http://skyraider3d.military-meshes.com/skyraider/photos/old_warden/ow_05-08-20_night_hangar.jpg
    http://skyraider3d.military-meshes.com/skyraider/photos/old_warden/ow_05-08-20_night_hind.jpg
    http://skyraider3d.military-meshes.com/skyraider/photos/old_warden/ow_05-08-20_night_martlet.jpg
    Mind you these pictures were taken without the aid of a tripod. I simply held the camera tight against a fence for a few seconds at ISO 800. The hanager pic though is taken with the camera resting on the spoiler of my car at ISO 100 with a much longer exposure πŸ˜€
    Considering the colour… again Digital provides unequalled opportunities to experiment with white balance and pictures can easily be adjusted in programs such as Photoshop – especially when shooting RAW. It’s all a matter of what you do and what you want – definitely not the capabilities.

    The EOS 300D is aimed at the more serious amateur and is a really nice piece of kit for the price. Combined with a good lens (I am using rubbish lenses at the moment – still undecided what lens to buy) it can create professional quality pictures without a doubt.

    in reply to: Book recommendations wanted #1365435
    Skyraider3D
    Participant

    I’ve read a number of pilot autobiographies and am currently reading “The Big Show” by Pierre Clostermann. It is simply a fantastic read and I can very highly recommend it!!!

    For a view from the other side, try “I flew for the FΓΌhrer” by Heinz Knoke. Quite sober but fascinating.

    in reply to: digital vs film #465689
    Skyraider3D
    Participant

    What’s this “film” stuff you’re talking about? πŸ˜€

    I’ve been using a digital SLR for a year and a bit now (6.3 MP Canon EOS 300D) and there’s no way I will ever go back to film. The ease of use, instant result, ability to edit and low cost per shot (I shoot hundreds of pics at a show and all it costs is the price of burning a DVD every now and then) far outweigh any possible benefits film might have.

    in reply to: Anyone want a TU-2? #1367541
    Skyraider3D
    Participant

    Bit of fresh paint and she’s a looker πŸ˜€

    in reply to: Dark and dusky Old Warden… #482910
    Skyraider3D
    Participant

    Thanks a lot everyone πŸ™‚

    I am using an EOS 300D with Canon EF-III 75-300mm F4.5/5.6 lens. The lens is a stand-in until I have decided what proper lens I will buy. My old 100-400 broke down some time ago and the 75-300 placeholder is quite poor for airshows.

    And yes, the Spit was indeed landing (at supersonic speed so it would seem :D)

    PS. Notice the gathering of flies(!) on the shadow side of the white fuselage stripe of the Mustang – visible as dots on the first photo. I guess they were happily waiting for the “ride” πŸ˜€

    in reply to: Unlimited Gold final, Reno #482919
    Skyraider3D
    Participant

    Thanks.

    Looks like it’s gonna be the Canon 100-400 then I’ll buy… seen some very impressive results with that.

    in reply to: Old Warden 24/9/05 #483419
    Skyraider3D
    Participant

    The light was getting a bit tricky by the time the spitfire went up.

    No kidding πŸ˜€

    in reply to: Old Warden 24/9/05 #483441
    Skyraider3D
    Participant

    Nice take off shot of the PT-22 πŸ™‚
    The Spit is pretty decent too, considering the appaling light conditions! Mine were all blurry and blurrier (except one landing shot which came out OK).

    in reply to: Malta airshow #483465
    Skyraider3D
    Participant

    Lovely shots!

    in reply to: Old Warden sunset air display 24 Sept. #483661
    Skyraider3D
    Participant

    Nice shots! Especially like the Mustang arrival. Nice and shiny πŸ™‚

    The Spitfire was shot on ISO 1000!

    I stubbornly stuck to ISO 200 which made me end up with 1/20th of a second shutterspeed. Very nasty, but not entirely without success though…

    in reply to: Kecksemet and Low level flying in Wales. #483662
    Skyraider3D
    Participant

    Absolutely stunning. Been wanting to go on such a Wales trip myself once, but I never know when to go. At least thanks to you I now know where! πŸ˜‰

    in reply to: Unlimited Gold final, Reno #483663
    Skyraider3D
    Participant

    PS. What sort of lens are these pics taken with?

    in reply to: Unlimited Gold final, Reno #483675
    Skyraider3D
    Participant

    AWESOME!

Viewing 15 posts - 946 through 960 (of 1,265 total)