dark light

Mondariz

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 331 through 345 (of 1,411 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: How many types have been lost? #1192491
    Mondariz
    Participant

    I live in Denmark and have seen the Bv 138 wreck….

    Great its on display, but it does not give real justice to the actual aircraft.

    in reply to: How many types have been lost? #1192613
    Mondariz
    Participant

    From wikipedia:

    The other surviving Hampden, P5436, is being reconstructed largely from parts of the last Canadian-built example recovered from 600 feet of water in Saanich Inlet on Vancouver Island in 1989, as well as recovered components from two other Hampden crashes in Canada. The aircraft was ditched on a training flight in 1942 when the pilot lost control after a torpedo drop. As of 2007, the reconstruction of the aircraft is about 97 per cent complete, and is currently the showpiece exhibit at the Canadian Museum of Flight at Langley, British Columbia, in the Fraser Valley, east of Vancouver.

    http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/ec/Hampden_in_Vancouver.jpg

    in reply to: How many types have been lost? #1192795
    Mondariz
    Participant

    I thought they had one in Canada……

    Regarding the WWII era, it was purely to limit the list. I would love to see the 1930’s RAF aircraft too (or any other nations lost 1930’s types).

    in reply to: How many types have been lost? #1192814
    Mondariz
    Participant

    No Hampden?

    That makes me sad 🙁

    in reply to: Crown Copyright #1192879
    Mondariz
    Participant

    Sorry for a triple post, but I got to add this.

    Using IWM material for a commercial book is a matter of nerves.

    A copyright infringement have to be filed by the content owner (this is not automatic, as copyright is not a law that can be broken in its self), as if you copy an image from a book and the author then files a copyright infringement suit against you. However, if you can provide evidence of acquiring the images from a place without a copyright claim, it will be hard to for any owner to prove you infringed on their copyright.

    in reply to: Crown Copyright #1193005
    Mondariz
    Participant

    Copying Crown Copyright from a third party source, that don’t claim copyright for the content, should technically leave people in the clear, as they infringe on the interlectual property of the creator (who do not claim copyright).

    The original material is in the ownership of IWM (although they don’t have copyright), the copy of that material is not the material itself and thus not owned by IWM.

    Naturally the image has entered circulation through some license with IWM, but its that individual creator that can complain about copyright infringement – NOT IWM.

    How can it be established where an image has been copied from, when any number of magazines and books might have used the same image (originally licensed from IWM)?

    Once such images are in circulation on the internet, they are defacto public domain.

    in reply to: Crown Copyright #1193049
    Mondariz
    Participant

    Regarding Crown Copyright, there are two things to note:

    1. Published Crown copyright material has protection for 50 years from date of publication.

    2. No unpublished material will lose its copyright protection until January 1, 2040. As per the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988.

    I have had a longer discussion with IWM about their fees and their copyright claim, and it seems they insist their materials belong to them.

    This is a direct quote from a mail i recieved from the MOD Directorate of Intellectual Property Rights Copyright Unit (DIPR-CC).

    “Any Crown Copyright photos/film dating from WW11 would now be out of copyright in the UK”

    This is a copy of my correspondence with IWM:

    “As noted in my previous email, the duration of Crown Copyright is 50
    years and such material older than this is indeed out of copyright. The
    Imperial War Museum as the owners and holders of this material (which
    involves, amongst numerous other responsibilities, conservation and
    access) licences it for a wide range of uses. I attach our standard
    Terms and Conditions which will perhaps help clarify this.

    If I may explain more fully: This Second World War RAF material is in
    the ownership of the Imperial War Museum and released under licence to
    the DVD distribution company. The DVD produced using the material
    licenced from the Imperial War Museum has a copyright in its own right
    (in a similar way as a television programme using such material would
    have its own copyright ) and may only be used for the purposes stated on
    the DVD sleeve and box. By purchasing the DVD the purchaser agrees the
    terms of sale as detailed on the DVD sleeve and box – in effect, a
    contract – and DVDs containing our material limit the use to private
    home use only.”

    It thus appears that there is another copyright attached to new use of the materials, such as IWM posting them on a website. This new copyright is concerned with the website content, rather than the actual images.

    The same goes if the images were printed in a book, then its protected by the copyright of the book – although the actual image is no longer protected.

    All a bit too complicated and made to squeeze money out of people. The material should be public domain, as its funded by the British public and no longer have a military function.

    in reply to: Pictures from the X-15 project #1193604
    Mondariz
    Participant

    Adding to the wedge shaped stabiliser I seen to remember, that the X-15 didn’t have a conventional rudder. Rather it had two spoiler/speedbreak-type control surfaces (one on each side of the stabiliser).

    in reply to: WW2 Aircraft from all sides – Picture thread #1193957
    Mondariz
    Participant

    Lovely pictures, please keep posting.

    No worries on the copyright. All US WWII images are public domain, all Nazi Germany images likewise and Crown copyright have expired for all RAF WWII material.

    Should one image fall outside those catagories, then we can consider this forum an educational/research forum, which it would be hard to press copyright infringement suits against.

    in reply to: The "Wot Plane" Thread. (Game rules in Post #1) #1194111
    Mondariz
    Participant

    I routinely save these quiz pictures for future reference and quizzing my friends.

    in reply to: Pictures from the X-1 project #1194204
    Mondariz
    Participant

    Yes, the X-1A had a conventional windscreen/hood. The mach buster (with the sloped bullet style windscreen) was simply called X-1 (originally XS-1).

    Lets hope the taped up wires are related to ground test, or even the photo session :p

    http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/22/Bell_X-1A.jpg/784px-Bell_X-1A.jpg

    in reply to: The "Wot Plane" Thread. (Game rules in Post #1) #1194212
    Mondariz
    Participant

    Planemike: If you are interested I would be happy to write a detailed instruction on posting pictures. Including screenshots.

    Its not complicated once you know where to start.

    in reply to: The "Wot Plane" Thread. (Game rules in Post #1) #1194368
    Mondariz
    Participant

    Correct!

    You have control.

    in reply to: The "Wot Plane" Thread. (Game rules in Post #1) #1194399
    Mondariz
    Participant

    Ok, here is the next mystery.

    http://i183.photobucket.com/albums/x217/MONDARIZDK/sdgsdg.jpg

    in reply to: The "Wot Plane" Thread. (Game rules in Post #1) #1194713
    Mondariz
    Participant

    I got as far as the VT for India, after I resorted to decode the black smear 😀

    However, I was unable to find a matching Indian aircraft….

    I will be pleased to post the next, but it will have to wait untill tomorrow.

    Hope you have a pleasant time away.

Viewing 15 posts - 331 through 345 (of 1,411 total)