dark light

Mondariz

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 571 through 585 (of 1,411 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Miles M.52 and the X-1 – again! #1170208
    Mondariz
    Participant

    http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question/history/q0198c.shtml

    For those who havent read this account of Hans Guido Mutke’s flight on 9th April 1945 flying an Me 262 it may throw a spanner in this debate. Further referencing can be found on the net including information released by the Americans on this and other debriefed pilots of the German jet. It pre dates the bell aircraft and one has to ask if the Americans knew this why did they continue telling the world that they got a first?

    For anyone interested in the Me 262 claim/story, it was discussed ad nausea on the ww2aircraft forum:

    http://www.ww2aircraft.net/forum/aviation/sound-barrier-10422.html

    Have a read, its quite entertaining at times….

    Mondariz
    Participant

    I would suggest Avro Anson for training crew for the aircraft mentioned in the OP.

    No Buck Rogers, no Buck Rogers……..DOH!

    in reply to: Top Five Most Significant UK Aircraft Types #1176323
    Mondariz
    Participant

    Oh and here are my top five:

    Hawker Hurricane – for its historic impact during BoB.

    de Havilland DH.89 Dragon Rapide – most commercially succesfull British airliner in terms of numbers build. Also played a significant part in the evolution of civilian air trafic.

    Avro Anson – for training a significant part of the WWII multiengine crews.

    English Electric Canberra – for most successful British military jet (production numbers and service life) and for allround awesomeness.

    Westland-Hill Pterodactyl V – for the best use of the word Pterodactyl and generally discouraging the use of Lysergic acid diethylamide while designing aircraft.

    in reply to: Top Five Most Significant UK Aircraft Types #1176450
    Mondariz
    Participant

    It seems that people forget to write the reason for their choice.

    In particular I would like to hear, why TSR-2 is so significant in any of the catagories mentioned in the OP.

    All other aircraft mentioned, have had a successful operational life. TSR-2 certainly didn’t.

    An amazing aircraft, but surely not among the top 5 British aircraft types of all time….

    in reply to: Besler Steam Plane. #1180885
    Mondariz
    Participant

    Nice idea, what a shame the interest evaporated…….

    in reply to: Something for the weekend sir? #1184770
    Mondariz
    Participant

    Thats what I want for Xmas!

    And I’ll even promise that I won’t use it inside……..

    in reply to: Something for the weekend sir? #1191254
    Mondariz
    Participant

    Damn, that view count went up fast……

    in reply to: Airworthy Warbirds market value #1191561
    Mondariz
    Participant

    My bet is, that the most money can been made from sourcing warbird projects.

    Although its a strange and mystifying world, I would think that those able to locate new material (Eg aircraft) can make a profit. I expect the Hinds from Afghanistan to net the finder/investor a bit of profit.

    However, the business undertaking such a venture, should have the right knowledge and connections from the word go.

    in reply to: Airworthy Warbirds market value #1191588
    Mondariz
    Participant

    The warbird marked is one of the many areas of aviation, where its possible to make a small fortune.

    The only prerequisite is that you start out with a BIG FORTUNE!

    😀

    There are a few people, who are able to carve out a business of the scene, but its my understanding that everyone else are in the warbird “market” as a labour of love.

    I don’t think many warbird operators considers it a financial investment. Even if some might have made a small profit over the years (my bet is that its very few).

    in reply to: Airworthy Warbirds market value #1192692
    Mondariz
    Participant

    I have never seen a common collection of warbird prices, where the development could be traced.

    I think you will have to investigate individual aircrafts that have changed hands within the last 15-20 years.

    I’m pretty sure its a bad investment for the pure economy of it.

    in reply to: Hitlers flying dart #1196311
    Mondariz
    Participant

    The article is pure guesswork, they know absolutly nothing about those drawings.

    But for the sake of it, lets consider the problems an escaped baloon passenger would face…………DOH!

    The British answer would be gigantic windmills to blow the baloon far out over the atlantic, resulting in a drowning death, which is more aryan than getting…..you guessed it.

    in reply to: Hitlers flying dart #1196329
    Mondariz
    Participant

    Germany wasn’t the only country to come up with odd ideas and designs, Britain, America, Japan and others had a few.
    Now that was a weird one.:diablo:

    My only head scratching moment about ze Dart Bomber, is that if it had a balloon attached, how on earth would it be able to escape to safety?

    Whilst back in Blighty, pitchforks were still being used by some of the Home Guard.:D

    The goal was not safty, death by baloon was simply considered more aryan, than getting captured by the British.

    in reply to: Hitlers flying dart #1196945
    Mondariz
    Participant

    a 700mph wooden glider?

    And gently drift away in a baloon………

    in reply to: Fairlight, Hastings – Intrepid Aviator! #1198194
    Mondariz
    Participant

    Class!

    in reply to: Give me a big truck and a time machine #1199164
    Mondariz
    Participant

    Found another few from Tunisia.

    http://tbn0.google.com/hosted/images/c?q=7ceeab763f7a2966_landing

    http://tbn0.google.com/hosted/images/c?q=82ec9a7480a0e1d4_landing

    http://tbn0.google.com/hosted/images/c?q=abdccc7a43d39925_landing

    http://tbn0.google.com/hosted/images/c?q=f7380fd2649a87bd_landing

    http://tbn0.google.com/hosted/images/c?q=ad1d90ba3d73087f_landing

Viewing 15 posts - 571 through 585 (of 1,411 total)