dark light

Mondariz

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 601 through 615 (of 1,411 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Ju-87 Stuka #1205327
    Mondariz
    Participant

    Appreciating German technology does not make anyone a nazi 😀

    Regarding the combat victory, I can see how an rookie pilot might have gotten too close to that rear gun (even if only 7.92)…:eek:

    Killing a plane on approach, or a straggler, is also considered a kill. When the Stukas (Stukai? 😀 ) were used in the early blitz krieg warfare, its likely they would have caught more than a few pilots unprepared and gotten a few air to air kills that way.

    Hans-Ulrich Rudel shot down 9 aircraft in his career. As he flew mostly Stuka, I would assume that some of these were from within a Ju-87. However, Im sure the forumites will correct this if incorrect.

    A P-39……..he must have been drunk 😉

    in reply to: Ju52 Wreck Picture in Russia #1205493
    Mondariz
    Participant

    Looking at the pictures from the older post, I was wondering: whats with the hand rail on the port side of the fuselage?

    On the starboard i can understand it, as that way over the wing leads to a door, but the port side has no door.

    Surely its not for ease of maintenance (that would be a first).

    BTW it looks in pretty good condition considering.

    in reply to: Ju52 Wreck Picture in Russia #1205514
    Mondariz
    Participant

    What an extraordinary find.

    I can’t seem to locate an airfield called Evinsino anywhere in Russia, could someone post some details?

    in reply to: Lynx Rotor Blades ZD559 #1206956
    Mondariz
    Participant

    Several FAA and AAC Lynx have been removed from service, stripped of components for the Future Lynx Programme and the bare shells put up for disposal, 2 are currently in the scrap compound at Yeovilton. The idea of replacement airframes such as Brazil, Denmark and Germany was investigated using XZ699 but then abandoned, this airframe was then restored by AGWHL apprentices and donated to the FAAM at Yeovilton

    Having been part of the airframe replacement undertaking, I fully understand why the MOD abandoned the idea. Its quite possible, but its the expensive way around.

    In Denmark the project was chosen over new helicopters, because they could spread the cost over two military spending budgets (rather than buying new aircraft). One for the airframe replacement and a further (as yet unscheduled) update for the avionics (this is nessesary, because the original avionics pack slowly is going out of production and spares will be short in the future).

    Eventually these will become the worlds most expensive helicopters 😎

    Britain are furthermore in the position, where purchacing new Lynx helicopters actually strenghten their economy and create jobs ect.

    in reply to: The Beardmore Inflexible 1928 #1207298
    Mondariz
    Participant

    What a shame they stopped using spoked wheels on aircraft…..

    Imagine the Airbus 380 with highly polished spoked wheels…cool!

    in reply to: Lynx Rotor Blades ZD559 #1207301
    Mondariz
    Participant

    “There are plenty preserved.”

    50, to be exact……

    http://www.demobbed.org.uk/

    Would that be MOD Lynx only?

    Then add all the nations, who have had to replace/rebuild their fleet and you might find that there are close to 100. Which is high for a fairly insignificant aircraft (historically).

    AFAIK the Dutch and the Brazilians have “life” upgraded their fleet too, which could add 32 unservicable airframes to the museum circuit.

    in reply to: Photos of the Spruce Goose #1207421
    Mondariz
    Participant

    The “one man’s vision” type project is unfortunatly a closed chapter for the aviation industry (besides a few much smaller projects).

    We should consider how lucky we are, that that aircraft survived to be placed on display. Despite the fact that nobody actually knew it still existed (ok, a few knew).

    Too many of the really extraordinary aircraft have been lost.

    Imagine if the Brabazon had survived in the same way……

    in reply to: Lynx Rotor Blades ZD559 #1207422
    Mondariz
    Participant

    Now many are preserved?

    I shouldnt think many as theyre still in service

    There are plenty preserved.

    The original model only had 7000 hours lifetime on the airframe, which means that most Lynx helicopters from before the mid 80’s are no longer servicable (depending of their service life).

    I litterally replaced the airframe and rotor system on 6 Danish navy Lynx Mk.80. The airframes were donated to various institutions (mostly museums).

    When you replace the airframe and rotor system on any aircraft, you are actually assembling a new aircraft.

    I’m pretty sure the British military have been replacing/rebuilding their fleet and thus releasing quite a few airframes from service.

    in reply to: Lynx Rotor Blades ZD559 #1207501
    Mondariz
    Participant

    I fully support the advice of David Burke.

    Having 200 hours of flying time according to the paperwork, is not the same as being servicable. Also they are most likely not BERP rotor blades, which is used on most Lynx helicopters today.

    Furthermore, its unlikely that anyone would ever buy servicable rotor blades on Ebay.

    in reply to: Photos of the Spruce Goose #1207787
    Mondariz
    Participant

    Picture 4.

    You gotta love the guy with the crosscut saw….a Spruce Goose indeed.

    I’m pretty sure the Life magazine photographer said: “can we get a woodworker in here, so our readers understand that this thing is made of wood.”

    in reply to: Photos of the Spruce Goose #1208270
    Mondariz
    Participant

    As long as i can wear a hat like Howards, then i’m up for building a replica.

    Mondariz
    Participant

    An image or file that is the work of a U.S. serviceman or employee, taken or made during the course of the person’s official duties. As a work of the U.S. federal government, the image or file is in the public domain.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyright_status_of_work_by_the_U.S._government

    Naturally, if the material is still classified, you should not publish it, or even own it. However, its unlikely that wartime material in private hands would still be classified. Traning manuals and such are no longer classified.

    If you could post the nature of the “classified” material, i will be happy to look it up for you.

    Regarding the books:

    “Works published with notice of copyright or registered in unpublished form on or after January 1, 1923, and prior to January 1, 1964, had to be renewed during the 28th year of their first term of copyright to maintain copyright for a full 95-year term.

    With the exception of maps, music, and movies, the vast majority of works published in the United States before 1964 were never renewed for a second copyright term”

    If the books have been out of print since your copy was made, then its unlikely, that they are copyright protected. However, its something you should look into. Again, if you post more information, I will be happy to assist you.

    in reply to: Interesting Spitfire image… #1213501
    Mondariz
    Participant

    Unusual picture. I saw also noticed it in the Google Life archive.

    Regarding posting it: After reading the terms and conditions on Google, I have come to the conclusion that in-line linking, or indeed re-posting, is not considered a violation by Google or Life magazine.

    Life Magazine still holds copyright to all the archive material, but its available for non-commercial use.

    So I don’t think anybody should worry, unless Life, or Google, change the terms and conditions in the future.

    in reply to: Query For Moderators #1215443
    Mondariz
    Participant

    Historically (sorry about that) there tends to be a system upgrade about every four or five years and sometimes this results in mass pruning of the archive.

    What the future would make of the Stork Hotel debate is a topic for conjecture.

    This question should really be directed at Key itself. All the moderators do is clear out the spam for you and take a lot of flak when we do something that someone disagrees with.

    I suppose you have highlighted much of the transience of information in cyberspace.

    Moggy

    What Moggy C points out here, will haunt researchers in the future.

    In the countless online fora, there is a goldmine of knowledge, that people used to buy in books (and lots of books too).

    The “art” of data-mining could be put to good use, if directed towards these fora, rather than generating spam and force-selling crap to people.

    Its such a shame, that this accumulation of knowledge is going to waste.

    I have personally learned more about historic aviation in this forum, than in any of my books.

    in reply to: Query For Moderators #1215453
    Mondariz
    Participant

    There are ways to “harvest” the data from a forum. I will not go into details, but if the forum owners would accept such solution, I will try to make a tutorial for people, who might want to keep the data.

    The photos are mostly hostes on other sites, so they might dissapear according to the rules of those sites. I’m not sure if you can “harvest” across sites like that.

    And I just realise that OldEightBit had more or less written the same as I……

Viewing 15 posts - 601 through 615 (of 1,411 total)