Without stretching the religious analagy too far, I suspect this would be considered a ‘heretical opinion’ by many involved in restoration! I thought that keeping as much originality in the aircraft (or any item under resoration) is of vital importance, otherwise you might as well just go for a straight forward new build copy of an original?
DS
I did mention that only relics, that could never become part of a restoration, should be used for backengineering.
I’m all for restoration, but when there no longer are parts of restoration quality, we should be looking at the options.
Given the number and quality of surviving Stirling parts, it does not look like a restoration will ever be completed, and certainly never a flying Stirling
Besides, they will not nessesarily be damaged and they will not be destroyed completely in the backengineering process.
Given the chance of having a number of undisplayable relics, or having technical insight in the Stirling (which could become the basis of a recreation), I would choose the latter.
Parts of restoration quality should naturally be used in the recreation.
Question:
Would people prefer authentic Stirling parts (wreck parts and relics, most of which is in storage), to a airworthy recreation (100% backengineered, perhaps even destroying some original parts)?
Admittedly there is restoration and ‘restoration’.
From the pictures I saw, it didnt seem that one could easily tack it back together to act as a representative display.
I have seen these parts, although it was a while ago now, and remember being pretty horrified at the state of them.
I would suggest that if you looked at them with a view to using them in a reconstruction of a complete aircraft, that there would be little left on completion, even for a cosmetic rebuild.
Bruce
So you think they would be lost in the process of backengineering?
I can see that happen, but is it not of greater value to have the new technical drawings (and a chance of a replica) than a large number of U/S relics?
The word “relic” should not be taken in its religious meaning, as there is nothing sacred about sheet metal and rivets. To me the relic represents the technology and if the relic is damaged during backengineering, i think its worth is, considering the data such a process would provide. Although only if we are looking at relics, that could never become part of a restoration.
I think you need to look at those parts the RAFM hold as what they are – relics – if you ‘restore’ them, there will be nothing left of the original part, apart from an odd bracket or fishplate here or there.
Their value for the future is to provide detail of how the Stirling was built, and to enable a reproduction to be made using those parts as reference.
My belief is that the value of unique parts such as this lies in keeping them as they are.
Bruce
Surely everybody is talking about using them for a recreation and not restoring them for flight.
At this stage it must be admitted that no wartime Stirling will ever fly again, so its now a question of recreating one from data gathered from the relics. That means a complete replica, flying or not.
As I understand it, there are no original and complete drawings sets left. Does that mean no original drawings at all?
Does the Stirling project have an estimate regarding what needs to be “found” before there is a chance (however fantastic) to recreate a Stirling?
Looking at various pictures, I dare to estimate a guess on 40% Stirling sitting in various places….
I have not yet seen any undercarriage parts, but I have only been looking today.
I was just wondering if the dreamscenarion of full coorporation was to happen, how much could we be looking at…….as templates for a brand new Stirling.
Would any of the Stirling experts dare to guess on the percentage of Stirling wreckage?
In other words, how much exists in various collections, in case somebody wanted to reverse engineer a full Stirling – how much would there be?
If the Soviets had the Stirling how did they get there – ferry flight across occupied Europe or in bits by sea?
A book entitled ‘Dirty Little Secrets of WW II’ points out that there are large numbers of sunken British merchantmen lying at the bottom of the Arctic Ocean that never made it to Murmansk…containing hundreds of tanks, planes and parts thereof…
Many (all?) of these are probably war-graves but Bob Ballard, if you’re reading this, can you take a look?
I will pledge a generous donation to the Stirling fund when I win the Euromillions and if there are very few pre-war Shorts aircraft about we’d better save the postwar ones Skyvan, SD-330, SD-360… real aeroplanes!
An earlier post in this thread linked to another Stirling thread, where the Soviet Stirling was mentioned.
It seems they got it just post-war and flew it for a few years. There is also two pictures of a Soviet Stirling.
Agree to get Ballard involved 😎
Do we know that the Egyptian Stirlings were “buldozed into the ground” and not melted down?
Has the Egyptian authorities been approached regarding such a dig and is the location known?
As Cees write above, any substantial section would be of great value to the restoration/recreation process.
Is there a webpage with more information regarding this replica?
Does anyone know if Russian archives have been searched for drawings and other information, that is no longer available in Europe?
If the soviets operated a Stirling for some time, its not unlikely that they would have produced (or recived along with the Stirling) drawings and other maintenance papers. Perhaps they would even have begun to reverse engineer the aircraft.
I’m aware the Stirling would have been considered obsolete by the time the Soviets actually got one, but the request could have been made years before they finally got a Stirling. Likewise could the reverse engineering request could have been made while the aircraft still was considered worth it and just never canceled.
Surely they must at least have operational records, pictures, pilot reports and other kinds of “memorabilia” usefull to Stirling historians.
Here is a screenshot of the above location:

Oh the curse of the “previously unknown large-scale underground air raid shelter”…….where to hide?
They found another “missing” bunker in Denmark last month. However, the question is not about missing bunkers, but the possibility of finding aircraft inside them.
While I don’t think anybody would dismiss the possibility, most people have heard those stories over and over, without a single aircraft even being found. Scepticism is therefore quite natural.
Personally I’m of the opinion, that there are still some amazing WWII aircraft discoveries to be made out there, but I don’t really think bunkers are where they will be made.
Looks very nice 12jaguar (sounds like a name of a mayan king).
Its a huge task, but even getting as far as the picture is quite an achievement. I could sit there all day going “brrrrrrrrrrrrrrr…”
The thread linked is a couple of years old, so a “re-post” seems ok. People read/learn something new all the time, and new people join the forum.
It would be very nice with the webpage you suggest. None of the Stirling pages i have seen, presents the current global situation – How much is left and where.
And naturally also all the rumours………..
With over 500 lost in action, there is always a chance a significant relic will be located. I’m pretty sure all war survivors were scrapped (unfortunatly).
I have no Stirling books, but wikipedia has the number of lost Stirlings at 582. How many of these have been accounted for?
Is there a chance of finding something worthwhile?
I know there are quite a few in the north sea, but they are most likely completely gone by now. Could there be a chance in Norway, or somewhere in the alps?
Did some get stuck in russia at some stage?
I seem to remember reading about an operation, where the aircraft landing in russia were unable to leave. The mission was canceled. Maybe it wasn’t Stirlings…
How did the Canadians fare with them, any aircraft lost somewhere in the wilderness?