dark light

Mondariz

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 121 through 135 (of 1,411 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Most Interesting Wreck Sites In The World #1099755
    Mondariz
    Participant

    One story which amazes me because its never been made into a Hollywood movie is what happened to the Liberator ‘Lady Be Good‘, and its crew. I know it’s no longer in situ and politically a bit difficult too, but a story begging to be told visually, and it would easily make an hour!

    The TV film “Sole Survivor” from 1970 was loosely based on the “Lady Be Good”. I seem to remember it was quite good.

    in reply to: Most Interesting Wreck Sites In The World #1103441
    Mondariz
    Participant

    what happened to the 3 giant luftwaffe seaplanes strafed and sunk at lake biscarosse in ww2 ?

    At least 2 Do 24T-3 has been recovered from lake Biscarrosse in the early 80’s.

    http://www.preservedaxisaircraft.com/Luftwaffe/dornier/dornier.htm

    in reply to: Most Interesting Wreck Sites In The World #1103442
    Mondariz
    Participant

    B-18 Bolo in Hawaii

    http://www.ndtahq.com/documents/BigIslandBomber.pdf

    Thanks for a nice link 🙂

    in reply to: Most Interesting Wreck Sites In The World #1103627
    Mondariz
    Participant

    I think the Himalayans would make for excellent TV. From April 1942 to November 1945 USAAF lifted more than 650,000 tons of materials and more than 30.000 persons across The Hump. In the process they lost almost 600 aircraft – a large number of which are still in situ somewhere in the mountains.

    The whole operation is might be less glamorous than actual combat missions, but this is where the allied won the war – material and logistics. I could imagine a program telling the story of The Hump while trying to locate a wreck – it’s a big place so it might be best to use a known site.

    I would love to see a program like this, but please don’t make it in the current US style bang-wiz booming voiced dribble they call documentary today. If the story is good, it will tell itself without trying to make it sound exciting by idiotic voiceovers.

    in reply to: Historic Aviation Forum: RSS Feed #1104734
    Mondariz
    Participant

    I think we should definitely have it.

    What is it?

    That made my day 😀

    in reply to: Last Flight #1104740
    Mondariz
    Participant

    A well written and moving tale. Not to bring anyone down, but unfortunately these reunions will become more and more rare…..it will be a great loss to the warbird community and to historic aviation in general.

    in reply to: Some Spitfire advice please! #1114125
    Mondariz
    Participant

    I always thought it was Low-level, or Low-altitude…. :confused:

    To be honest, the more I try to pay attention to the Spitfire threads on this forum, the more confused I become! :p :diablo:

    I think (always prefix my limited Spirtfire information with “I think”) you are right, but rather than an actual “job description” it was describing the supercharger – where a supercharged engine produced its maximum power: below 10.000 L.F, below 20.000 F, above 25.000 H.F.

    It was not used throughout the war, so the L.F.Mark IX (with a Merlin 266) might have changed designation to Mark XVI as Edgar Brooks points out.

    in reply to: Great Scoops From Flickr And LIFE Archive #1114720
    Mondariz
    Participant

    Found another Flickr with a few aviation pictures.

    Australian War Memorial. Mostly soldiers, but a few flyboys too.

    http://www.flickr.com/photos/australian-war-memorial/

    1914: Colonel Granville Ryrie unfased by the new technology, as it will never surpass a fine horse in combat.
    http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2189/3527159012_8920a0d12b_z.jpg

    http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3432/3288865828_f0fb56ea48_z.jpg

    http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3485/3288052387_3e9afcc8c1_z.jpg

    in reply to: Some Spitfire advice please! #1114862
    Mondariz
    Participant

    It always amazes me that Supermarine knew what they were building at any one time!

    Maybe they didn’t and had a bucket full of luck. Their post-Spitfire line isn’t exactly a rose garden….

    in reply to: Some Spitfire advice please! #1115020
    Mondariz
    Participant

    They didn’t make it easy, did they?

    in reply to: Some Spitfire advice please! #1115134
    Mondariz
    Participant

    I think it had a different engine: Merlin 266 (a Merlin 66 build in the USA by Packard).

    in reply to: Late Cold-War photo resource #1115356
    Mondariz
    Participant

    I think there is a huge problem with some of the photo libraries eg Flight/ Aeroplane/ Boeing in so far as the fees that they charge for their photos for publication are so high that people like myself who write articles for aviation magazines, simply can not afford to use them. The cost of two photos would often be more that the fee paid for the article. As anyone would know we don’t do it for the money but we can’t do it for nothing..
    Sadly some individual photographers are also culpable. I was once quoted £200 for the use of a photo to accompany my recent RF-4C article. Needless to say I didn’t bother!

    We need to be able to rely on one another. I for one have no hesitation in sharing photos with other enthusiasts and writers
    Finally on a positive note: What a joy to discover that the BAe photo archives don’t charge for reproduction.

    Although I’m not an aviation writer, I fully understand and support your post. Charging for pictures in this category means that they might never reach a researcher who could use it to complete his/her work. The whole idea of intellectual property and copyright has taken a ridicules turn, where everyone think their work represent a value and that they might be missing out on big bucks.

    The truth is that apart from the original picture (either the negative or a paper version) which are traded and sold between collectors, pictures don’t really represent a value.

    Personally I have uploaded my limited collection of aviation pictures to both Flickr and Wikimedia Commons as public domain. I would be delighted if anyone found some use for it commercial or non-commercial. If someone actually makes a few bucks writing an article/book and include my picture, I would think my percentage would be staggeringly small, maybe even infinitely small, and they would be more than welcome to keep it.

    in reply to: Late Cold-War photo resource #1116148
    Mondariz
    Participant

    Kind of a ramble going on here :rolleyes:

    With the large amount of public domain aviation pictures online, I’m curious as to who are actually buying such pictures. Really great aviation photographers might make good money producing photo books with their work, but does anyone make a business of stock aviation pictures?

    Having gone through a good part, I must confess that there are a few fantastic pictures, although the majority is of the average garden variety air show snap (some even below that). The last category is due to letting everyone upload pictures. In my humble view that will ruin their business plan, as people are going to trawl through hundreds of poor pictures, just to find that one that’s worth paying for – takes too long.

    There are 158 Spitfire pictures on Wikimedia commons alone, both wartime and current. Maybe people don’t know about those wonderful free media libraries.

    Anyway, I can see people might pay to avoid any chance of copyright infringement, which could happen on public domain sites, as no one really checks if the pictures are truly public domain.

    Has anyone here sold pictures through a stock photography website?

    in reply to: My Visit to ?Newark #1116269
    Mondariz
    Participant

    Can’t see the pics so real stab in the dark for a laugh, is it the Saab Safir (single prop trainer jobby!)

    Good stab 😎

    in reply to: Late Cold-War photo resource #1116271
    Mondariz
    Participant

    I understand the idea of watermarks 😀

    Its just completely beyond me, why people are so protective of their snaps.

Viewing 15 posts - 121 through 135 (of 1,411 total)