dark light

2nd Air Force

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 15 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Aircraft panel for identification. #763051
    2nd Air Force
    Participant

    Hi again,

    I’m actually in the U.S. and am an engine and systems guy for one of the airlines here. I’ve spent a good many years working on 757s and 767s. 

    Cheers,

    Scott

    in reply to: Aircraft panel for identification. #763054
    2nd Air Force
    Participant

    Hi again, Danny.

    Since we’ve retired our 767s I’m no longer able to access the parts catalog, but I thought about that little panel and can definitely tell you that it is located on the lower surface of a slat at the point where two outboard slats meet. The rubber “seal” is a rubstrip that protects the anti-ice duct coupling from chafing. I’ve replaced and rigged the slats often enough that I should have recognized your part sooner……

    Scott

    in reply to: Aircraft panel for identification. #763063
    2nd Air Force
    Participant

    It’s from a Boeing 767 but I’ll have to do a little digging on the actual part and it’s location. It looks familiar–I worked on the 767 for many years but I’ll have to dig in the parts catalog to jog my memory.

    in reply to: BOAC Liberator II Landing At Prestwick #777917
    2nd Air Force
    Participant

    Yes, it’s quite legible! Nice addition to the Liberator Liner file.

    in reply to: BOAC Liberator II Landing At Prestwick #778910
    2nd Air Force
    Participant

    Yes, I agree. Consolidated must have been thinking in postwar terms when it came to designing the Liberator-Liner and the U.S. Navy gave them the impetus to actually construct the airframe. It wasn’t nearly as good a concept as the York but I reckon it’s all that Consolidated could come up with! 

     

    in reply to: BOAC Liberator II Landing At Prestwick #779651
    2nd Air Force
    Participant

    Ahh…. answered my own question– it’s the AA airplane.

    Great find, my friend!

    in reply to: BOAC Liberator II Landing At Prestwick #779750
    2nd Air Force
    Participant

    Is that the U.S. Navy version or the American Airlines airplane? I have never seen this photo of the Liberator-Liner before!

    in reply to: BOAC Liberator II Landing At Prestwick #787976
    2nd Air Force
    Participant

    We were always led to believe that the Army Air Forces bailed ‘927 back to Consolidated due to it being heavily damaged in the accident. Some confusion existed(still exists) among our group as to who owned the airplane in the first place. My opinion was that it was officially an RAF aircraft loaned to TWA for the training role, others thought the U.S. Army was the true owner. Regardless, the airplane was saved!

    in reply to: BOAC Liberator II Landing At Prestwick #788128
    2nd Air Force
    Participant

    Ian,

    The names correspond exactly with the history that the CAF has in their historical accounts of AM927.

    We had always thought that Consolidated came out to Eagle Nest and inspected the airplane, then decided to temporarily repair it for a ferry flight back to San Diego for permanent repairs. However, the new info you’ve unearthed makes good sense also–that TWA was responsible for repairing the airplane since they had damaged it. Perhaps a decision was made at Kansas City that Consolidated should have this particular airframe bailed back to them and that’s when it became a company airplane.

    Cheers, 

    Scott

    in reply to: BOAC Liberator II Landing At Prestwick #788688
    2nd Air Force
    Participant

    Ian, 

    Back when we were researching the history of AM927 we were able to confirm the accident date and location and that the airplane was repaired sufficiently to be bailed back to Consolidated. I did not know that TWA repaired the airplane in Kansas City–that is a good bit of info. 

    We are no longer associated with the airplane or the organization that owns it, but I still get excited to learn anything I can about AM927.

    in reply to: BOAC Liberator II Landing At Prestwick #788977
    2nd Air Force
    Participant

    I scan this subject occasionally and tonight it paid off handsomely. Ian Woodward’s post with the news clipping titled “Bomber Damaged” is the first 1941 account I’ve read of “our” old bomber’s accident. I’m quite certain the airplane in the article is Liberator I AM927, now with the CAF. AM927 was damaged at Eagle’s Nest in a landing accident and the nose was damaged in the mishap. Consolidated took her back and the rest is history. The reason I call the airplane “ours” is that my wife and I worked on AM927 in 2007/08 during the refurbishment led by Gary Austin. 

    Everyone keep up the excellent research, and hopefully someone, one day, will be able to unearth a photo of AM927 in her original state.

    in reply to: Ball turret test firing clip #862154
    2nd Air Force
    Participant

    Tony,

    If I recall correctly, one of the guns jammed during the firing sequence, hence the slower-than-expected rate.

    in reply to: FW190 shot down #947202
    2nd Air Force
    Participant

    The Fw 190 landing gear is electrically operated by independent actuators. Only at the very end (Ta 152) was the gear modified to a hydraulic system.

    in reply to: What's this hangar? #953421
    2nd Air Force
    Participant

    As Mark said, this is a hangar that was used at quite a few stations in the U.S. during WWII. In fact, just last week we were very near one of these that is still in use at the former Sioux City Army Air Field in Iowa. This structure was usually referred to as a “sub-depot” hangar at CONUS bomber training stations.

    in reply to: Pima Shack getting a repaint! #1005839
    2nd Air Force
    Participant

    I spent a fair number of hours around WL790 when it was stored/parked at Midland, Tx. and was glad to hear that the airplane was going to Pima (though I wish it had been possible for it to be kept airworthy). The Pima folks will take good care of him!

    Scott

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 15 total)