If this happens and the story about the Harriers U-turn is also correct, then thats three bits of good news today, the other of course being Osama Bin Laden’s death. Though I did notice in the Telegraph article that a Senior Naval Officer was quoted as saying it was virtually unheard of to change the name of a ship that was already being built. HMS Eagle was originally styled HMS Audacious and HMS Ark Royal IV was to have been called Irresistible, both of these name changes I believe following commencement of construction. Hey and the Sun is shining on May Day Bank holiday, whoopie.
Also except for a few long lead items as of yet PoW isn’t in build. I don’t think Appledore are slated to start working on the bow of PoW until 2012. So indeed hardly a big deal changing the name considering it has been done before ironically for an earlier Ark Royal. I also have a hunch that these are many in the RN’s top brass who would prefer that name.
Personally I would love to see “Hermes” being used for a future ship but I won’t hold my breath!
I can understand you and thank for your understanding :p
On another hand you forgot something concerning our poor Rafale fanfoy’s fate: we also endured the JOUST simulation for years which established once for all in 1994 that the EF is obviously superior in AA, just a bit behind the F22, and everybody else behind.
Thanks yes I forgot about JOUST and how it has been used to **** off everybody especially the Rafale crowd!
What really angers me about JOUST is how its findings were totally abused and twisted. It was (and actually still is)used as an excellent way of simulating different threat situations. Unfortunately the press, Eurofighter sales types and Fanboys picked up on it and totally misunderstood what it was all about…that it was developed to support development of the BVRAAM program NOT Eurofighter! Computer modelling and simulation can give you lots of useful data for development programs before you take the risk of actually cutting metal. JOUST was at first used to simulate all sorts of combat situations with different missiles and aircraft, the system allows you to throw in all sorts of MADE UP variables to allow really flexible modelling of different scenarios! After that the system was used to support (and still is) the Typhoon development program, that sales types and the press picked up the results and totally confused what the data was meant to be for is a total embarrassment! JOUST is still in use today allowing modelling of different weapon systems and threat scenarios which can then be pushed into development programs:
It should never of been used as a stick to bash other aircraft as that wasn’t the point of its development. I have no doubt that Dassault probably do very similar data modeling to support the Rafale program as do other manufacturers.
Iranian Air Force Equips F-14 Fighter Jets with Hi-Tech Radars
I have a hunch that will be something similar to what they did to the radars fitted to their F4 Phantom a few years back. A digital upgrade replacing key components with modern equivalents allowing better data processing and increasing performance. Maybe replacing some of the cockpit displays as well to allow better situational awareness. This will also solve problems with components they have run out of or can no longer source.
Ummm check google news MSphere!
Well had to have a military aviation theme;)
USAF said otherwise in respect of an F22 vs Rafale encounter. Apparently there is slightly wore evidence for the Mirage 2000-9. But what does it matter as the USAF won’t give us the context of what happened there is nothing more to say.
Grandclaudon massively changed his tune after his rather fanciful press conference when pressed on the points! Nuff said!
Actually what angers me is digging up an old DISPUTED report by a pilot clearly gilding things to support Rafale sales…
Rafale fanboys tend to hate it when the ZERO sales or underpowered engine things come up in respect of Rafale (P.S. I don’t think its underpowered but its amazing how something can get blown out of all proportion if its repeated enough). Whilst Typhoon fanboys get irritated at reports like this or the idea it has never a legitimate sale or BAE bribes blah blah blah!
I don’t think I can take the next few months of this honestly! Can we just have reporting of developments with this contest rather then raking up mud!
I don’t like the content because Grandclaudon was shown to be economic with the truth (and lied – there was no combat with F22 in the exercise by Rafale).
During the exercise Typhoon and Rafale in most cases were on the same side and the only shoot down of a Tyhoon by Rafale was of a couple of NEW pilots working up.
If you want to repeat that BUNK then its your own problem but I will continue to point out it for what it was…
Your not bringing up that tosh again are you!:confused:
When he was later interviewed and asked to clarify his statements he was clearly shown to be economical with the truth of what happened. The Americans were also angry with the story that he told as well. It was clearly an exercise in supporting the Rafale sales drive in the UAE rather then talking about what was a training exercise.
Well its going to have to learn! Again if they want a decent GR4 replacement they will need those F35C, the carriers give more reason to purchase them.
Considering the cuts in Typhoon numbers and the fact that they won’t get FOAS (remember Typhoon ground attack capability was intended as a Jaguar replacement).
Looking at what was happening until it was cancelled FOAS was clearly intended as the Jewel in the crown replacement for Tornado whilst Typhoon was meant to be a replacement for Tornado F3 and Jaguar.
The problem is it just isn’t going to happen! However much we would like to see the FAA have its own squadrons the money counters won’t allow it. The fact is the FAA and the RAF need each other:
If the FAA want fighters on their carriers then they will need to share the airframes with the RAF.
If the RAF want a GR4 replacement then they need the longer legged F35C that can be operated off carriers.
I also think the RN see a future where they share pilots and even aircraft with the Aeronavale to keep up a core skill base. Which is why as I have said before that the UK won’t replace the Sea King ASaC 7 and find a way to share the French E2 Hawkeye maybe even putting what limited funds we had to do a full replacement of our AEW Sea king to help the French buy those extra one or two E2 they have always wanted.
Certainly Rafale and French E2 will be a regular sight on the QE and hopefully PoW.
Yes lets hope the public see sense on Thursday and vote Yes for AV! Giving a bloody nose to Cameron:diablo:
As for restoring Harriers, it would be politically humiliating post SDSR it would also take several months to stand them up again. Of course the irony is we are spending more now then we would of we had Harriers available.
That article is not an official statement by the Indian MOD! It is the OPINION of the author!
If we see something official then I am happy! Whilst I would like to see Typhoon win as I am British and it will save jobs here I’m not too bothered if Rafale is found to be the better solution.
It is a fact. It has been stated in the past that Rafale was the No.1 on the list after technical evaluation. Now, considering the price is also lower, the only think EF has going for itself are the industrial offsets.
Again where is the official evidence that Rafale scored top in the evaluation?! If you can show it or at least give a link to an official Indian MOD statement then fine I’m happy and we all shut up! But if you can’t then stop banging on about it…lets not have flame wars for the sake of nothing:mad:
Rafale has Meteor as well bring it on:
sources in the IAF told Deccan Chronicle.
😮 how shocking..
“Sources” are not an official of the India MOD standing in front of everybody and stating that they prefer x over y.