dark light

Fedaykin

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 2,626 through 2,640 (of 5,046 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Israeli warship 'badly damaged' by 'explosive drone' #2007967
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    Sorry to revive a necro thread but I think this article on China Defense Blog pretty much confirms to my mind that INS Hanit was hit by a C701 variant:

    http://china-defense.blogspot.com/2011/03/chinese-designed-c704-on-displayfor-all.html

    Its the longer ranged C704 but you get a good idea of how portable and hideable the system is. Along with the launch containers one small control console and a Kelvin Hughes navigation type radar.

    in reply to: Air Action Over Libya (Merged) #2317055
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    They were on screen too quick to tell old boy!

    Lets hope they are not being piloted by the RAF’s Chav pilots:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pqqGGxZqhLA&feature=related

    Random!

    in reply to: Air Action Over Libya (Merged) #2317126
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    Watching footage of Mirage 2000-5F on AlJazeera, pilots doing walkrounds etc. Aircraft loaded with three fuel pods and a heavy load of MIC-IR and MICA-EM ready for CAP.

    Only footage of RAF Tornado GR4 is a very short grainy takeoff on the BBC. I presume the UKs capability of launching ALARM anti radar missiles will be prised, only Italy has a similar capability.

    Gadaffi is threatening to attack targets in the med, he must be fully stocked up on his crazy pills! If he did sanction attacks on targets outside Libya it would be just the excuse to pulverise his armed forces from the air…of course I don’t know how much bottle his soldiers will show in the face of modern airpower.

    in reply to: Air Action Over Libya (Merged) #2317127
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    I don’t think that is exactly going to work as a propagand ruse Teej!

    A knackered F-5A?!

    in reply to: Submarine anti-air #2008043
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    Because going to periscope depth and engaging aircraft with missiles gives up your primary defense of stealth.

    in reply to: Air Action Over Libya (Merged) #2317912
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    Well time is seriously running out.

    Gaddafi is clearly throwing everything at Benghazi so as to retake it before a no fly zone is up.

    in reply to: Air Action Over Libya (Merged) #2318614
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    Well as I said the key is the rebels, if they ignore the ceasefire they might have a chance.

    We shall see…

    in reply to: Air Action Over Libya (Merged) #2318741
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    Well if the rebels have any sense they won’t agree to the ceasefire!

    in reply to: Air Action Over Libya (Merged) #2318814
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    Spoilsport!

    But it does present a BIG problem, STALEMATE!

    This is what I was worried might happen, Gadaffi deciding to write off Benghazi for the moment and consolodate what he has on the ground.

    This does leave the issue of a very unstable revenge minded dictator in power who will wait until the Western powers can’t sustain a NFZ! The only way forward is to poor weapons into Benghazi and hope the rebels wag Gadaffis tail.

    in reply to: Air Action Over Libya (Merged) #2318826
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    Well it would certainly show fruition of the Anglo French defence agreement.

    in reply to: Air Action Over Libya (Merged) #2318833
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    The level of excitement in the GR4 and Typhoon squadrons must be through the roof at the moment!:D

    After the horrors of SDSR and ongoing PR11 trouble the chance to actually do what they are paid for and even get a chance to see some air to air combat as well as SEAD/DEAD duties must be generating a buzz!

    I bet they are also praying that the US doesn’t throw a spanner in the works and demand that American assets do everything to ensure that they get good press on primetime news…

    in reply to: CVF Construction #2008534
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    Why not just stick a few Astute type reactors in each carrier and be done with it. Get rid of all that weight and space required for fuel, exhaust pipes and that damn silly second island superstructure. Whilst they are at it attach a sampson radar instead of the artisan and install 32 Aster 15 silo’s for proper self defence.

    COST! COST! COST!

    If you start sticking reactors a highend radar and missile system will send the costs on a price stretched program through the roof. As repeatedly stated the already planned Gas turbine and Diesel fit might well be enough for propulsion, hotel requirements and EMCAT/EMALS. If not another Gas Turbine is a far cheaper and simpler solution then a reactor. With a reactor you also need specialist shielding and maintenance personel…

    The S1850 and ARTISAN radar combination is frankly superb as it is. Installing SAMPSON is a needless exercise. ASTER 15 is nice but in the it adds big cost and has to be weighed against using Escort destroyers and Frigates for area defence.

    in reply to: CVF Construction #2008627
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    Indeed it just isn’t a big deal in respect of two EMALS/EMCAT catapult. They designed in space for steam plant so adding in more smaller gas turbines if required shouldn’t be a big deal.

    It would certainly be nice if DAX II gets a second chance frankly it was a superb solution. A revised design would certainly benefit from modern materials technology as well.

    in reply to: CVF Construction #2008642
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    Well I have no doubt that they are going to add more gas turbines to support the EMALS/EMCAT setup and I see a strong argument for going with an updated variant of DAX II from Mactaggart Scott in respect of arrestor gear. DAX II uses water rather then electricity but offers many if the benefits of AAG in respect of performance and running costs.

    Fedaykin
    Participant
Viewing 15 posts - 2,626 through 2,640 (of 5,046 total)