right fedaykin.i used to watch the video and what manoveurs 😉
firstly i felt scared but then u realise what a beaty beast it is
She was returning from joint manouvres with the PLAN but hit bad weather if I remember correctly. The Admiral Kuznetsov had to spend a fair amount of time in refit when she got back.
mine prefered is this one.guess which is? :p
Type 956 Sovremenny class Admiral Ushakov out on manouvers with the Admiral Kuznetsoz.
They would be good for what? Pretending to have jet fighters perhaps?
There is not even an airpolicing issue in NZ.
They do not need a jet fighter of any sort. Jet fighters are a waste of tax payers dollars that could go towards a more worthy cause.
I bet there are plenty of people in NZ who argue otherwise. 😀
I bet there are a few warbird collectors eagerly awaiting the release of those Bell 47G.
On another note I was pondering the future of Newzealands airforce and if there was a change of government a return to the fighter business. Something affordable is needed me thinks, maybe some of those Aero Vodchody L-159 light fighters which the Czech airforce have in storage would be good.
Impressive. 😉
You must be posting 24 hours a day to get 180000+ posts!
Impressive! 😀
Tornado video from Gulf war 1.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rvwnyd-HrFg&search=royal%20air%20force
Interesting development, does this mean China might consider selling to certain choice customers.
I realy can not see why it would be politically sensitive? Afterall the Typhoon is getting an Israeli Litening 3 pod.
Apparently certain MPs didn’t like the fact that the missile had been used to kill various terrorists and accidently various innocent people who happened to be near by.
I was surprised about the Litening 3 pod as well but it will be licenced built.
Actually you can. One of the ways is to use Keepvid, which provides the YouTube video as a FLV file to download. Once you’ve downloaded it, you can either watch it using a FLV player, or convert it to AVI or MPEG format (which I suspect most people will want to do).
To convert it in Windows, you need to get hold of a program like Riva and follow the instructions here.
Mac users should use iSquint, as it’s free and it does the job well enough.
Thanks Impi useful info!
U tube is a video blackhole – how does one DOWNLOAD a video from that site???
You can’t mate! But with a broad band connection its not a big deal, what I do is save the address of videos I find interesting. Almost as good as saving them but not the same amount of space taken up.
Im a youtube junkie now :diablo:
Wow that must of been fun, Apparently Willie Messerschmitt use to pop into the European project office.
Must go back to Cosford someday.
Always happy to please our resident Swedish Bloodhound expert.
Your welcome Turbina,
You got there before me Sea Dart caused massive headaches for the Argentines. Im a bit hazy about RN Phalanx purchases, i think the RN had purchased some for the carriers prior to the Falklands war.
I remember more than one book and documentary with RN personel expressing the surprise they felt over the Falklands war and the unsuitability of many of the primary weapon systems employed. The thing is I can understand why the MOD didn’t go for the Type 82 in the end it was overly big for their needs on the other hand the Type 42 was too small for its intended role.
That is very true, Sea Dart was designed to counter Soviet weapons systems that tended to use supersonic plunging missiles rather than sea skimmers, so for it’s intended role the emphasis on higher altitude longer range performance made sense. My complaint isn’t with Sea Dart per se (it was as good as any other AA missile of it’s era and probably better than most) but rather the economy decision to reduce costs with the Type 42 hull to the extent that it couldn’t take any additional major weapons and was built in the full knowledge that it’s close in AA defence was seriously defficient. Lack of surface-surface capability you can accept as part of the trade off to optimise a air defence vessel, but to build a air defence vessel with such a serious AA hole in it’s defence was crazy. The problem wasn’t that the RN was blind to the problem or ignored the threat of advanced sea skimmers, it was the treasury and politicians who were too tight fisted to pay for a decent hull. To build a ship, with an intended service life of 20-30 years that has already reached the limit of it’s capabilities when new is ridiculous. When the task force went South the Exocet threat was a major headache to all of the vessels in the transit South and all of the commanders were fully aware of just how exposed the vessels were to the threat.
Sea Cat was a very poor missile, there has always been a big debate as to whether replacing tri-axially stabilised, RPC 40mm mountings and equivalent with Sea Cat was actually an improvement or a degradation of AA capability, the old joke was that the only way Sea Cat would knock down an enemy target was if it crashed into the launcher 🙂
Of course at the time the Government were going to reduce the navy down to a glorified north atlantic asw force with the Americans providing all the serious AAW kit. Just look at the original speck for the type 23, no Sea Wolf at all with the Fort class providing air defence to several ships. I’m sure the MOD and politicians said you won’t be going up against anyone who has Sea Skimmers the Type 42 will do and the RN did what they always do: Shut up and Make do!
I talked to someone who served on a Amazon class ship during the Falklands and he told me the only decent air defence system they had on board was the Bofors 40mm, the Sea Cat was a waste of space in his opinion.