dark light

Fedaykin

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 4,966 through 4,980 (of 5,046 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • Fedaykin
    Participant

    Before everyone gets excited by the arrestor wires and christmas tree on the large image you will find that the picture is of the Admiral Kuznetsov whilst she was named Tbilisi.

    Im afraid the most recent images of the Varyag are too grainy to draw any firm conclusions. What can be said is that whilst the most recent pictures show a massively cleaned up hull I don’t see any of the signs that she is ready to be taken out to sea. There is none of the paraphanalia you would associate with a vessel about to enter service.

    On the other hand its still to early to say what her final use is. I think we can look at three main possibilities.

    1) She is beng prepared to enter service as a carrier but China is taking its time with fitting it out.

    2)She is being completed as a training tool for the PLAN.

    3)She is being completed as a casino/tourist attraction.

    I think we will know more when china completes the deck painting of the Varyag.

    in reply to: Franch AF Mirage 2000@Leuchars – 13 March 06 #2568552
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    Nice Pics!

    I always did have a soft spot for Dassaults Delta!

    Fedaykin
    Participant

    With all this chatter about what the PLAN has and how much blah blah blah, would the RoCN really have a chance if the Mainland wanted to roll in? The RoCN is based on old service types because no one is willing to sell new equipment to Taiwan for fear of upsetting China. It’s rediculous, honestly. If I were the President of Taiwan, I would force the issue with the world, either accept us, or don’t, don’t give us cast offs especially in the face of such a fearsome threat that China is obviously presenting.

    The PLAN is clearly more powerful then the RoCN now, Taiwans main deterrant is her Airforce and American intervention now.

    Fedaykin
    Participant

    Well well! New pictures of the Gorshkov and the Varyag within a few days.

    It must be Christmas!

    Aside from the Red and yellow paint which I presume is an undercoat the most interesting image is the bottom one clearly showing a newely painted deck edge elevator.

    Fedaykin
    Participant

    On paper at least the 052c Lanzhou class are very powerful units with a significant multi role capability. This capability is a bit of enigma considering we know so little about the performance of the indigenous missile systems fitted to the class.

    Things are made even more mysterious by the development of the 051c class which lacks much of the surface warfare capability and is focused on the AAW task. Whats even more fascinating is the fact that China appears to be hedging their bets and fitting the 051c class with the Russian RIF/S300F.

    Fedaykin
    Participant

    The picture is genuine.I took it myself.End of January 2005.

    No offence meant mate.

    The hull number 171 would make her the second in class Haikou. She was launched on the 30th of October 2003 with an in service date of somewhen during 2005.

    If you took a photo of her at the end of January 2005 she is either still undergoing sea trials or just entered service. A very lucky shot!

    Fedaykin
    Participant

    What type catapults will the French CVF use? C-13s or the new electros?

    Considering America is treating technical details of the electro ones like a state secret France will probably get a variant of the c13.

    Fedaykin
    Participant

    What kind of class is this?

    (Sorry for the low quality… 🙁 )

    Its a Type 052c Lanzhou class Air defence destroyer, you can tell by the phased array and the type 730 CIWS fore and aft among other things.

    The picture look like a photoshop job to me.

    in reply to: French S-3 Tankers? #2059962
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    Hi Hawkdriver05
    I quote from the current issue of Flight International

    “Kirkland says four non-Asian countries have already requested pricing and availability for some of the 100 ex-USN S-3s which will be available over the next four years and said at Asian Aerospace last month that Lockheed “spent a lot of time educating potential Asian users on the availability of the S-3”. He says the S-3 can be delivered “almost instantaneously” with 11,000h of service life remaining, while excess P-3s must be equipped with new wings to provide 15,000h or at least receive new critical wing parts to provide 5,000h of use.”
    If there are now compatability issues, the S3 would be a good IMHO. Buddy tanking is not the ideal solution.

    S3s are not the only thing at AMARC with plenty of hours left on them.

    There are a number of A6E and A7E with criminally small flight hours on their airframes. I believe this situation developed because these types were retired early due to peace dividend and some airframes had not been that long out of the factory.

    in reply to: Gorshkov – Back to the Future #2060127
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    Before and After Refit

    If you look at the image below you can see the before and after images of the Gorshkov refit.

    The deck area will be significantly increased including a longer and wider bow top to allow for the Ski Jump.

    The green area on the top image is the area to be added onto the Gorshkovs deck.

    in reply to: Gorshkov – Back to the Future #2060257
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    Hooray

    After spending the last few months being frustrated with a lack of new Varyag images from Dailan its nice to see the Gorshkov in refit.

    It looks like she is in the very early stages as she hasn’t even finished the strip down yet.

    in reply to: CVF Will It Be Built #2060339
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    Something from Strategy page today.

    http://www.strategypage.com/htmw/htnavai/articles/20060309.aspx

    Nothing much here we didn’t know already, but I wasn’t aware that quite so much apparent ‘cutting edge’ automation was planned.

    Robocarrier indeed……………… :rolleyes:

    This could well be old news.

    Whilst it was intended that the CVF would be highly automated over the last few years the CVF project office has been stripping out the automation to save money.

    in reply to: Lets see some mini/small carriers #2060389
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    If China goes ahead and builds a carrier then it would be quite likely that Japan would change its helicopter cruiser concept into a proper carrier probably operating F35.

    I don’t think there would be much issue with Japan breaking the ban on carrier construction. A few Asian countries would squeal a bit but in the end who could stop Japan.

    in reply to: Vikings to South America. #2574873
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    The catapaults on the Sao Paulo can barely launch the AF1 Fighting hawk with any reasonable load.

    To operate the S-3 would require the fitting of a newer, longer and more powerful catapault. Due to the short length of the Sao Paulos deck the installation of a longer catapault would hamper deck landing operations. This also the main reason that Brazil couldn’t adopt other low mileage but retired USN types like the A7E and A6E.

    The Charles De Gaulle is really the bare minimum size you can use to operate these larger types and even then they needed to stretch the deck to safely operate the E2.

    in reply to: Indian Sea Harriers #2575534
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    Does anybody have any evidence for the Derby on Indian Shars, I have seen several reports saying that the plan to upgrade the SHARS with Israeli kit was dropped and I have never seen a photo of a SHAR with a derby, or a report of sales of that missile to India.

    To be honest I know as much as you do.

    It looks like the Indian SHARS are getting some Israeli kit including the radar and the Derby was on the cards. Things could certainly change, what I do know is the Indian navy didn’t want to induct the standard UK spec F/A2 into service. If they are buying 10 airframes from the UK they will more than likely strip out much of the UK kit.

Viewing 15 posts - 4,966 through 4,980 (of 5,046 total)