dark light

Fedaykin

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 781 through 795 (of 5,046 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Invade the Falklands #1997534
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    Nah… a couple of merchant ships loaded with commando’s to conquer the islands along with the airport,
    its going to take a couple of months at least for UK to prepare a counter,
    so during that time send another couple of merchant ships loaded with fuel and supplies,
    this time around use the fricking airfield, load up on standoff anti ship missiles before hostilities,
    set up AD to protect the airfield, a couple of aircraft with surface search radar is needed, better yet with AEW.
    A couple of transport aircraft is also needed.

    I honestly don’t understand why this idea comes up every once in a while, firstly it totally ignores the logistic problems of the exercise and secondly assumes that the British forces operating on the Falklands are Morons!

    As Swerve pointed out they can’t approach the Islands without being checked over, cargo ships need dock facilities to offload and there are currently only two well protected very small places to do that. Those two places are more small jetty then a full harbour facility, the merchant ships would need local help to offload and I don’t exactly see that happening. The airbase is inland so somehow this force once offloaded have to travel and take that base before reinforcements arrive from the UK, as Swerve points out there is a large Garrison of British troops (all battle hardened from operations in Afghanistan) and the FIDF who have excellent local knowledge, a high level enthusiasm and are well equipped. And no Obligatory it would not take a couple of months for the UK to send reinforcements, current rapid reaction plan would have troops of the high readiness force flying out of the UK on C17 within hours. Also this Argentine force has to do all of this with no air cover and no reinforcements as UK SSN will have what is left of the Argentine navy bottled up. The Islanders are planning a proper deep water port at Port William Inlet to support the Oil and Gas industry as well as take over from the current inadequate facilities at Stanley but there is no doubt that it will be a very well protected facility.

    The pictures below are of the two current harbour facilities in the Falkland Islands, just one look at those pictures shows how silly an idea it is you are proposing Obligatory.

    Mare Harbour
    http://img94.imageshack.us/img94/5115/10052501axw600h6001.jpg

    FIPASS
    http://farm4.staticflickr.com/3119/2723259931_48ae5f65f9_z.jpg?zz=1

    in reply to: Invade the Falklands #1997593
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    You know Argentina did exactly what you suggest Yama, the Menem government of the 90’s offered a cash settlement to the Islanders. Initially it was around five hundred thousand pounds each but I believe the offer was upped to around one million each (not sure if that was pounds or dollars).

    The idea faced exactly the same problem that was apparent when there were negotiations between the UK and Argentina in the 1970’s about sovereignty, the Islanders! They have utterly no interest in that kind of offer. When Argentina failed to respect “UN resolution 1965” in 1982 by taking unilateral action and invading the idea that the Islanders would look favourably on a settlement based on some financial offer became farcically pointless. The invading Argentine forces in 1982 tried to bribe the Islanders with the offer of a colour TV each, Argentine soldiers who entered Stanley have written about their surprise that the Islanders were not of Spanish descent. They were expecting a Spanish speaking group of people celebrating having the British yoke thrown off them. Argentine propaganda at the time portrayed the Islanders as a Spanish descended rather then British.

    To be fair the Menem government is far better then the current one but the idea that the Islanders can be bribed into give up their way of life is a joke.

    http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/argentina-may-try-to-buy-out-falklands-each-islander-could-be-offered-475000-pounds-1460603.html

    Fedaykin
    Participant

    Indeed, in effect the QE class is the replacement for HMS Ocean. I am more interested in two thorny RFA replacement issues, the replacement of RFA Argus and Diligence.

    In respect of Argus I think a variant of the Enforcer design without the flood-able well deck but retaining the large helicopter deck. An internal vehicle hanger that can be be used for different roles and the capacity to carry equipment and troops. Like the new tankers it should be built in South Korea with final fit out in the UK.

    In respect of Diligence drop all these silly barge ideas and purchase a vessel similar to the current one, in other words an Oil industry support design adapted to navy needs. Again build in South Korea and fit out in the UK.

    in reply to: Japanese Plastic Model Trolls the Chinese Military #1997660
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    Awesome indeed.

    Though I felt sorry for the poor girls in the 38(t) & Renault B1. Loved the StuG.

    Turtle team eventually upgrade the 38(t) into a Hetzer, it is used in a rather unique way to take out the Maus!

    Kelly’s Hero’s also get a mention in the cartoon!

    in reply to: Japanese Plastic Model Trolls the Chinese Military #1997663
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    Gurlz und Punzer does have some traits of the weird SS-fetishism that goes on in Japan.

    Also it makes no freaking sense, but that is a given.
    I forget, did it come before, or was it inspired, by World of Tanks?

    Partially inspired by WoT. Man I have spent way too much time playing WoT!

    in reply to: Japanese Plastic Model Trolls the Chinese Military #1997715
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    There was a similar slightly hysterical Chinese reaction to the Japanese Anime “Girls und Panzer” (which is awesome by the way), Chinese media were saying all sorts of silly things about what is a cartoon.

    in reply to: Future RAF – Mixed Fighter Force re born #2270772
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    Also that is Mach 0.84 in the straight and level not a climb. If a Subsonic jet could realistically perform QRA then everybody would be using them in the role as it would entail significant cost savings.

    in reply to: QEC Construction #1997770
    Fedaykin
    Participant
    in reply to: Almost new Gripens for sale!! <3 #2270780
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    The first post-apartheid government rightly decided that South Africa was spending far more on its military than it needed to, because much of its spending was aimed at preventing what had just happened, i.e. the enfranchisement of the majority, & a lot was also aimed at fighting the Cold War. It therefore cut the budget. It also went overboard on spending on political correctness, & funding the social integration of former guerrillas, from within the military budget. It adopted a fairly sensible re-alignment of the forces, leading to the re-equipment of the navy & purchase of Gripen, Hawk, & the (later cancelled) A400M order. But the budget kept shrinking . . . . . & more & more of it was being diverted . . . . .

    S. Africa is a middle income country, richer per head than China (& much richer than India), & about the same as Brazil.

    Agreed.

    in reply to: Almost new Gripens for sale!! <3 #2270826
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    Of course the South African government has no problem funding the VIP fleet! Those ANC politicians do like those helicopters ferrying them around! The truth is until South Africa has a competitive opposition party in the majority black population the ANC will carry on in its rather corrupt way.

    in reply to: Almost new Gripens for sale!! <3 #2271015
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    Can this not turn into yet another argument about the JF-17, not as if we haven’t had enough of those already.

    For a country sitting on a huge amount of natural resources that should be raising plenty of taxation to more then easily fund the ongoing maintenance of their airforce this is a crazy situation. Gripen is meant to be one of the most affordable to operate Western fighter jets on the market, retirement through lack of funding is hardly a good reflection on the governance of the country.

    in reply to: Military Aviation News-2013 #2271024
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    The South African is considering selling off its Gripen fighters.

    SANDF to sell planes?

    Sad to watch the slow death of what was a very capable airforce, that they can’t afford to operate one of the most cost effective Western fighter jets around is shocking. South African is sitting on a huge amount of natural resources which must make their government a pretty penny in taxation! Shambles, utter shambles! If I was a FJ pilot in the South African airforce I would be looking for new employment. There are airforces that would happily take them.

    in reply to: Military Aviation News-2013 #2271084
    Fedaykin
    Participant
    in reply to: UK shortage of Frigates and Destroyers #1997878
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    I agree there are some nice synergies there Jonesy and I see no reason why 997 couldn’t fit on an MHPC, my only concern is how much would that eat into the budget for the MHPC.

    Also note that the current Hunt and Sandown class have the Kelvin Hughes Type 1007 and the River class the more advanced Terma Scanter 4100. Going to Type 997 on the new MHPC would be a massive jump and I again raise the issue of through life costs. Can the operations budget of the MHPC fleet support going to the 997 over something like the 1007 or 4100? Whilst it might give crewing synergies does it actually save money over the service life of the new MHPC. If it does then 997 is a good idea if not then I doubt the idea would win out on a cost benefit basis.

    in reply to: UK shortage of Frigates and Destroyers #1997901
    Fedaykin
    Participant

    Keeping 996 would defeat the point of bringing in 997. The 996 needs more maintenance and takes up more space below deck, the 997 takes up much less space and has greatly reduced through life costs.

    Also I would argue does an MHPC need a large 3D long range radar like 996 in its primary role?

Viewing 15 posts - 781 through 795 (of 5,046 total)