To be honest, I have no idea what you are talking about now.
Carry on.
You know what i am talking about the truth in latin america we have no militaries with power enough to invade or occupy other countries
tell me if with 12 old F-5s Mexico can make war?
What can do Brazil to occupy South america with these old Mirage 2000

or argentina wage war with old A-4s

The reality is our air forces are so old that is unsafe to fly in our own airplanes
You been watching Sarah Palin in the debates? You seem to be as good at her at deflecting questions…
Just because you are Latin American does not mean you understand the international relationships there. I am Canadian/American and live in Sweden. Do Swedes understand Nordic relationships because they are born there? Hell no. Do most American understand even their own country, let alone its relationship between its neighbors?? Please. Most Canadians still can’t figure out Quebec, let alone relationships outside of their nation.
Being Latin American does not give you carte blanche to be an expert in that field. In fact, it means you are more biased then someone who has no vested interest in the area.
The problems in South America have nothing to do with language, religion etc. They have to do with ideology, to a much greater extent then Europe. Ideology and economics are the decisive factor in Latin American society, not religion or language as it is in other parts of the world.
No i am not biased, i will give you some examples
In my family we have canadians, americans, Polish, Russians, Japanese, Chinese, Spanish, African americans, Chileans, Costaricans, Venezuelans, native americans, i have personally French, Lebanese, Vasque and Indian Blood So do you think we are not used to be more tolerant?
I can tell you we are homogeneous and we are not looking to make wars.
Mexico my country has only civil aircraft industry and our air force is more of a guard cost than an imperialistic arm.
Brazil is the same since Embraer makes more civil aircraft than military.
Chile makes more money by building tailplanes of the ERJ-145 than selling weapons
Mexico barely makes small light planes and some UAVs for recce duties no fighters or SAMs
We are more homogeneous and as an american experiment we are more tolerants and sooner or later less racist and biased.
our politicians are more worried about embezzling the own government than invading other nations.
And frankly man in latin america people is more interested in having fun than politics or invading countries.
So is it about numbers then? If there is a population of say 1,000 that is being persectued. 750 of them are killed. Following you line of thinking, that is not extermination as they numbers aren’t as high as 6 million. You ever hear the saying by Stalin “One death is a tragedy, a million is a statistic”? Ask the families of people that were killed during Pinochet or “disappeared” in Argentina. Ask Jacobo Timerman if he thinks that it is fine because the “totals” aren’t as high. Ask the hundreds of thousands killed, maimed and displaced in Guatemala, El Salvador and Columbia if it is ok as the number aren’t “that high”.
Your ignorance of Latin American history is right up there in disgrace as Holocaust deniers.
And by the way, Latin America is not even 200 years old, if you want to see mass war on that continent, give it some time. After all, WWI and WWII took place after Europe had been around for oh…. 1500 years.
Post some more pretty pictures, they are quite good at distracting your ignorance.
No ignorant of Latin america i am not, because i am latin american and i can tell you we understand each other easily, Do i have friends from other latin american countries yes i do, and more important we do not feel we are from different countries simple we speak the same language, we usually go to the same chuch and have similar culture to say we do not feel extrange to each other
You are unaware latin america has more easines for integration than Europe simple we speak the same language and we profess the same religion.
To do what Europe did we need to become superpowers and invade other countries like some Europeans nations did after 1492, but i will tell you a secret buddy to make wars as you say we would need pass a WWIII and still be superpowers, the current most likely scenario for WWIII is not in latin america but in Asia.
Either we change as Humans or no one in this planet will survive a WWIII.
The most likely scenarios for wars are still in Asia since the vast majority of cultural and resources based conflicts are there.
See India builds weapons to counteract China and Pakistan, NATO is installing a battery of missiles in poland and that is irritating the Euroasian power named Russia.
China is embarked in a military modernization to become as they think the next superpower, so in few words is not in latin america the most likely scenario of wars but Asia and the middle east where there is more interstate wars than in latin america.
I’m justifying nothing and excusing nothing, unlike you, with your bizarre belief in the saintliness of an entire continent. I’m merely pointing out that Latin America is not immune to wickedness. You make claims about inter-state wars, ignoring the carnage within states, & make extraordinary claims about Latin American people. I do not see the connection you do between living “simple lives” (such as Rwandans did before 1994 – and what came next?), & not being “poisoned by the evil of nationalism and extremism”. The bloody intransigence of Latin American guerillas looks pretty extreme to me.
But enough of this. I won’t respond to any more idiocy.
yeah yeah so tell me how many people die in the Falkland war? less than 1000, how many died in Georgia or Iraq?
How many died in the Cenepa war? less than 200, so tell me having mostly UCAVs old F-5s, MiG-21s, MiG-23s, Mirage III, Kfirs a couple of dozens F-16s and Su-30 what kind of war you can see in Latin america?
ah i see you think these Mexican UCAV can take on the entire USAF dropping illegal immigrants with a lunch box with tacos and Quesadillas do not you?
![]()
or this argentine Helo take on the RAF over the Falklands part 2 in 2030

Please do not dream, only in Georgia has died more civilians than in the entire cenepa war and falkland war, you are dreaming when you see super battles or a desire of war when all the latin american air forces are mostly obsolete and have mostly patrol aircraft.
Oh dear. You obviously know little of the history of Latin America. Look up The War of the Triple Alliance. Look up the “War of the Desert”, which was called even by some Argentineans at the time a sordid extermination campaign. Read up on “La Violencia” in Colombia, or the modern history of Guatemala & El Salvador. Study the Chaco War.
The lack of successful wars of conquest has mostly been due to weak states, not lack of viciousness. When the necessary conditions have existed, wars have been of high intensity, killing large proportions of populations. The War of the Triple Alliance has the distinction of having killed the highest recorded proportion of the population of a warring state, & the losses in the Chaco war were similar, in proportion to population, to those of the two world wars. The Mexican revolution & the subsequent civil wars were spectacularly calamitous, with deaths on a par with the worst-affected European countries in the world wars.
The totals are smaller than in European wars, but entirely due to smaller initial populations.
That is the tipical way of justifying carnage and savagery, all the wars you are listing are wars of course and therefore can be called mass killings but Hitler or Stalin have no parallel in Latin america, first becasue to make war you need a war machine, and a war machine needs an elite with desire of conquest and total wars need a philosophy like nazism, of extremism, we in latin america have had not such wars because simply we have too much resoures and little need to fight for them.
Excusing nazism is what you are doing, nazism is a murderous philosophy and resposible for the dead of 50 million people, we have had crazy politicians true but none like Hitler in magnitude and most of it becasue people in latin america live simple lives, and are not poisoned by the evil of nationalism and extremism as other parts of the world are. and you know that is simply because we do not spend as other nations as much in weapons.
We have some similarities to nations like Canada and Australia, too much land and resources available and small populations we do not need wars for resoruces as other countries had had;) and probably you do not know it but we recieve lots of immigrants too so we are more tolerant to foreigners too
In fact less than 1000 poeple had died in inter state wars in Latin american since the falkland wars
in fact all the wars you mentioned never can be compared to European wars in scale simply becasue niether napoleon or hitler could kill and exterminate Russia because Russia was so large and populous, while the mapuche were in proportion a small number of people and still are alive in Chile, and most of them form part of the blood of the Chileans as the Quechuas in Bolivia.

Here i present you the most powerful stealth bomber of the Bolivian air force ready for the next 2030 war
Here we have the next super fighter in the level of the F-22 and PAK FA ready to make war from the Colombian air force, sources claim it will be send to patrol the skies of Georgia and armenia 
here the Mexican super stealthy UCAV with super cruise ready to take on USAF F-35s and PLAAF J-10s, sources say mexico has bought 100000 to drop illegal immigrants over the rio grande with parachute, it is equipped with its burrito and coke

Here one of the most powerful bombers the FAB has close to 1000 of these machines ready for wars of extermination and dogfight it is designed witha 15Gs overload capability and supercruise very similar to the Eurofighter Gripen and PAK FA armed with the ultra secret 20 billion Euros missile 1234567890 sources say it plays samba music while firing the missile
So, let me get this right. You are claiming because there has not been killing/destruction/death on the scale of WWI or WWII Latin/Southern Americans are brotherly and love each other? So following your logic the more highly advanced weaponry, nuclear weapons etc, the more violent the society? So I guess Africa is just a Utopia without parallel? No nukes there, not very sophisticated weaponry. Following your logic it should be far safer then say….oh… SWEDEN.
BTW who said you need military technology for such war and destruction. Ask the people of Rwanda how technologically advanced the ones who committed genocide were. Is Somalia now a hot bed of high tech weaponry because there is widespread violence? You are equating high levels of military technology to the ability to conduct war. Just look at the “Disappeared” of Argentina, or opponents of Pinochet. Maybe FARC, ELN, the Shining Path and others ring a bell?
As for no country wanting to invade/interfere/etc with another country in South American perhaps you should read some of those articles. The Cenepa War was in 1995, the Washington article was from LAST YEAR. You are flat out wrong in your Utopian beliefs about Latin America.
And do not call me friend. It is reserved for the few that are, of which I do not consider you one.
No one said Latin america was paradise, however you know perfectly the mass murder that was WWII has no parallel in the XX century of Latin america.
Pinochet even in his worst years never killed as many people as Hitler did or Stalin did.
can you compare the mini war between Peru and Ecuador to the mass killings of civilians of Coventry or Desdren in WWII, can you compare Hiroshima or Nagasaki to the Sinking of the Belgrano or at least to the battle of Midway?
You are just in denial. In latin america since its indepence has not had wars in the level of Europe.
You know why? well i will tell you why simply because for the US in the XX century there was no need for wars of exterminations as Hitler did in Europe.

The US has always sought peace in Latin america and Latin america has never had wars of extermination as Europe has had or Asia has.
Guerrillas have no ICBMs, no F-16s, no A-10s no C-130 Hercules and basicly the latin american Guerrillas are more crime sindicates than real military movements.
violence exists in Latin america but inter state wars where an air force can measure up against another one well buddy you have to look else where.
In fact Fujimori and Galtieri were after the wars they made prosecuted and jailed we did not need a Nuremberg trial to put war criminals in Jail, Galtieri for the Falklands and Fujimori for the mass killings and Cenepa ![]()

To ring you a bell In latin america no one has a military budget close to the ones of the US, Britain, China, India, Russia and most of the latin american air forces are obsolete;) Brazil is the closest but the brazilian air force can not be compared to the Indian air force specially since Brazil has no nukes and India does, the rest of Nations are not spending more than 6 billion a year
to make war you need war machines and definitively we do not have them
well, I translated a bit of the J-8H that I found on Chinese forums, this was posted on my blog, so it’s very informal.
It seems to be an interceptor however they do not compare the fighter with other known fighters.
It is difficult to know if its is better than the F-4 or MiG-23 but definitively will be better than an old Su-15 armed with AA-3 Anabs and AA-8 Aphid
Did I say any of that to the contrary?
Did I say Latin Americans don’t consider them brothers?
Did I ever say Latin Americans hate each other?
Did I say they are racist? :mad::(
Trying to involve racial crap into here eh? 😡
I LIVE IN A COUNTRY WITH A 25 YEAR OLD CIVIL WAR! I KNOW WHAT RACISM IS! I’VE SEEN HORRIBLE THINGS WITH MY OWN EYES :mad::(
Where the hell did I ever say “That Latin Americans don’t consider them brothers?” or “Did I ever say latin americans hate each other?” :mad::mad::mad:
I specifically said proxy wars where super-powers use other nation as their battle grounds! The other thing is wars by drug loads, the drug monsters who don’t give **** about anything. Everyday people want to have peaceful lives just to get on with their lives! We all hate war. Which ‘HUMAN’ like war? Thats why it is the everyday person who suffers. I am still living in one!
This has to be my worst day at AFM…. :mad::mad::mad:
#!@$@#%#$%….
relax man do not make a tantrum.
First of all to have a war you need the following factors
first you need economic factors to push a nation to go to war against another, second you need enough ethnic or social differences to make conflicts between two ethnic groups and third you might need historical antecedents to still stir hate between two nations.
latin america never has had wars like Germany or Russia did in WWII where 20 million Soviet citizens lost their lives and close to 10 million Germans did.
Niether we have the cultural differences of Pakistan and India or Iran and Israel in religion to justify mistrust.
Third Latin america has not large populations with lack of resouces like China versus Russia or China versus India.
Now see these facts
In Asia there are four acknowledged nuclear wielding powers, Russia, China, Pakistan and India, Latin america has none.
Iran is not in Latin america niether Iraq and North Korea is not there too
China has a big military aircraft industry same Russia they are political rivals and have a history of wars and mistrust.
same is Pakistan and India or India and China
Mercosur is an economic treaty to merge all the south american nations like the EU has done that means they do not want wars among their members.
So before claim a fact first read about politics and history before claiming possible proxy wars in a part of the world you do not know.
Most of the aircraft industry in Mexico, Brazil and Argentina is civil and not military.
Really? Care to explain this to me then?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cenepa_War
or this?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paquisha_War
Maybe this?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colombia%E2%80%93Peru_War
Maybe this?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beagle_conflictOr maybe this recent event?
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2008/mar/03/south-america-on-brink-of-war/Ill informed eh? Calling the kettle black I think.
Ill informed and alarmistic is your seudo savy position.
Number one the number of people killed in Latin american wars is too small compared to the number of people killed just in WWII in Europe or Asia.
Second in Latin america we are not a paradise but definitively there is not enough military hardware for prolonged wars, since only Brazil makes first class world class weapons and these are still very limited in technology and number.
Mexico. Argentina and brazil won`t invade any neighbour soon and no nation in Latin america is stupid enough to embark in a war against another neighbour when we still live in poverty.
Only Venezuela and Cuba have military needs to defend themselves against external military threats but still these are more imaginary than real sicne in reality no latin american air force will last more than a week versus the USAF.
So my friend first you should meditate why more than 30 million people were killed in Europe in WWII and later claim in latin american we have had such degree of carnage in our countries or why in Asia more nations have nukes than in the american continent
That is very, very funny! Y’know, I’ve been mistaken for an Argentinean, in Bolivia. A continent so homogeneous that an an Englishman speaking bad Spanish can be mistaken for someone from the next country 😀 Try asking a rich white Bolivian or Peruvian or Paraguayan if he considers his Quechua or Aymara or Guarani-speaking compatriots “brothers”, let alone other Latin Americans. Look at how ordinary Chileans treat a Brazilian lorry driver. See the expressions on the faces of Argentinean passport control when they see the ID card of a Chilean army officer (on leave, taking a holiday in Argentina). Ask why proposals to build a gas pipeline from Bolivia to Chile are met with mass protests in Bolivia, with tens of thousands marching on the presidential palace to protest.
Brothers! Really, really comical. :rolleyes:
My friend homogenity means number one in latin american we speak the same language contrary to Europe or Asia, if you speak portuguese you understand spanish and viceversa.
Also we have almost the same religion catholic and most of latin america is christian with some sincretism
If it is true there is racial problems still going on in Latin american these probelms have been mostly provoked by the racist mentality of the colonial times however a large part of the total population is of bi-racial or tri-racial background, so interracial marriages are common and probably Latin american is 50% of mixed racial and ethnic background.
Small border problems do not mean a need for an air force like Russia or germany have, in fact the main threat to the area according to most left wing politicians is the US and if you speak spanish you know what Fidel Castro and Hugo Chavez say however most of people and politicans do not see real enemies since most of latin americans even want peaceful relations with the US.
Brazil is not a treat to its neighbours.
The vast majority of Latin americans look alike since all the nations in latin america have more than one racial or ethnic composition however all the nations have mixed people of different races and ethnicities smoothing in part any real war like mentality.
In fact you are more comical since the vast majority of people in Peru are of indian descent and there is not real difference between a quechua and a common peruvian since most of peruvians have indian blood and most of peruvians have african or Spanish blood too.
Any way in Latin america everyone has relatives who have broken racial barriers and have relatives married to people of different races and ethicities we are Latin america not south africa in the 1980s
It’s also nice if they are polite enough to enter the country legally. 😀
(Like my wife did…)
My friend, remember this, an illegal immigration problem won`t make a war as suggested by Twisted.
Remember this in 1492 Europe invaded the legally indian lands, prior to the US mexican war of 1846-1848, the US sended illegal imigrants to what was Mexican territory, these illegal immigrants were the ones who provoked a sedition and secession problem for the mexican government of Santa Ana, the US took illegally by force northern mexico by means of war and illegal immigration
So all that legality is just hypocresy by a nation which stole its way through indian and Mexican lands.
However in 2008 mexico does not represent any military threat to the US.
The vast majority of Americans are not as racist as to claim they need bomb mexico to stop illegal immigration, and the real smart americans know that problem will stop when in mexico there is enough wealth and a culture of democratic values that is supported by the US not by means of war but by peaceful political means.
Not sure ’bout Texas..tho in Cali one certain ethnic group is..err..”transforming” neighborhoods, cities and culture, and not always for the better.
Let’s just say demography is changing rapidly. For better or worse I don’t know.
tho this discussion is way off-topic,lol..my bad. 😮
Yep, agreed. 🙂
Why to claim a wave of immigrants will create a war?
First there is no military power threating the US from Mexico since Mexico first has only 12 old F-5s and a few Pilatus versus the entire USAF with F-22s and F-35s even forgeting the american fleet of F-16s and F-18s.
Second Mexico and the US can not live without each other economically.
Third the universal human rights declaration claims all of us are Humans and the same species having equal rights and all the Americans values are based upon that concept, so there is not going to be a war between Mexico and the US in the near future because most of americans consider themselves Cristians and not racially biased and most mexicans want closer links with the US .
So in few words the land of the free as the americans call it wellcomes all immigrants and the criterion for rejection is not based upon race but on moral character.
LOL
I can see a Humburger taco war or the Taco copy right war over who owns the copy rights of the Taco, Mexican taco stands versus taco bell using their powerful beans as fuel propellant:D or the air war between the Kentuky fried Chicken`s TWISTER versus the Mexican Taco for which one will win the original name of Taco or twister.
Man wake up the US won`t attack Mexico we are friends;)
Most likely timeframe(?) – (2030-2060)
USA – North Texas vs South Texas
USA vs Mexico
USA vs California
USA – Northeast vs Southwest
Seriously, not joking.
I can see the illegal refuges flying kites against the US air force and the US air force bombing the factories of the american own companies in Mexico as the wet dreams of the KKK.
By the way the US makes a lot of its military hardware in mexico, ranging from fuselages of helicopters to turbine parts or aircraft design through companies such as GE, Honeywell or MD helicopters
Wake up buddy the North american Union is a reality, Mexico will merge with Canada and the US. In fact is more likely you will increase the number of Mexican nationals in the US armed forces than Mexico fighting the US.
See this cultural trend Burritos and coca cola do not make war that is the merging of of North america and basicly they are called Kentuky fried chicken and Taco Bell.
IMVHO Note:
China vs Taiwan?
Well that depends allot on leadership changes. Think on both sides, “War is bad for business (other than the ‘ironmongers’)” should prevail. There is ‘WAY’ too much for both sides to lose in this conflict and IMHO especially for PRC. A PRC 1st strike, invasion of Taiwan would open the door for others come in and seriously weaken PRC militarily and economically. PRC is business minded and despite some tough talk I doubt an unprovoked invasion would happen or even a provoked one (possibly a missile strike but other than that…..hmmm have my doubts. Besides, the whole issue of the 1000+ missiles, even if it was 2000+, Brian C (Taiwanese and a moderator at CDF) posted an interesting article about how effective can the missiles be in the first place. It may not be so clear cut as some might think). The 2 sides moving closer especially in terms of business is much more likely and there is already HUGE amounts of trade. There is simply too much to lose. Think common sense should prevail.
China Vs Russia?
Eh? I know they aren’t exactly the best of friends but……again eh? :confused:
DPRK Vs RoKAF/USAF/RoCAF?
Maybe, but more likely DPRK Vs RoKAF/JSDF/USAF. And the end result would there disappearance of the DPRK military. And any nuke used my DPRK is very bad for everyone in the region including PRC and Russia. Far less of a problem to ConUS especially with more advanced BMD, assuming DPRK can produce a viable ICBM in the 1st place :rolleyes:.
USAF Vs RuAF? Again way too much to lose. The whole world will lose! Far more likely to have proxy wars. Using other countries, which is very bad for smaller nations, but a direct confrontation, doubt it.
UK vs Norway? :confused:
UK vs Argentina? Another rear-end spanking for Argentina? :confused:
US vs Venezuela? Hmm, maybe, but Venezuela will have to really build up its military. Good excuse for more F-22 and maybe naval YF-23 :diablo: Doubt president Chavez is that stupid. I am sure there will be plenty of firepower from his vocal cords but other than that…:D
South American border clashes? Especially proxy wars? Now this is sadly, very unfortunately likely IMHO… 🙁
Middle-East conflicts? Possible, but again If it is Israel Vs. Iran, Syria? How long will Iranian and Syrian A/F last? It would be a different ball game if it was the entire Arab world (including SA, UAE, and so on) Vs IDF/AF. But how likely is that?
Pakistan and India? Now for me this something close to home. 😮 Both nuclear powers, both have fought each other directly on several occasions in the past. Scary probability…..
But, simply put proxy wars are very likely. Especially when there are multiple superpowers around the world. The superpowers using other nation as battle grounds. This is a scary probability not just a possibility for smaller nations….:(
anyway all in all I sincerely hope we will have less, (preferably NO) conflicts at all….fingers crossed
Contrary to your ill informed opinion, in latin america there is such homogenious culture, that most latin americans consider themselves as brothers.
Brazil sees more threats from the US than from Venezuela,
Venezuela considers as its main threat the US as well as Cuba or Bolivia do.
Argentina won`t fight England.
There is a study for a Common defense treaty for the whole of South america and if you have seen military sales in south american, you have MADE in Brazil and Made in Russia aircraft in most of the last 10 years further more a real war in Latin american would create a flood of refugees fleeing north to Miami or LA something the US is unwilling to accept.
Proxy wars are more likely to happen in Asia.
In few wars neither the US or Latin america are in reality willing to go to war, the future of latin america is the US and the future of the US is Latin america.