You have no idea, what you are talking about.
Personal preferences and wishes aside may allow you a balanced view.
You do claim capabilities for the JH-7, which were not forseen in the 80s and not demaned by customers for given missions in mind.
5 tons of weaponsload is enough for the intended role, at least in times, when no more than 3 tons (2 AAMs) are of practical use at all. The heavy weight does give you a high wingload for a smooth ride at low level. The speed envelope of the JH-7 is sufficiant and comparable with that of the MiG-27*. but it does offer two-engine safety and still better range.
When you do claim stealth as a feature all Flankers are obsolete alltogether.
Neither the Tornado nor the Su-24 are built for over a decade and the F-111 was a class of its own. As the Tu-22 is a class of its own and can be seen as a replacement for the Tu-16.
To compare something to the JH-7, we have to stick to the 30 tons supersonic class. When you buy Russian equipment you was limited to that at hand as you was with western ones. Every country has to decide itself, what does suit its demands at best. For most missions the present “multi-role” designs are an overkill and a waste of money by that. China like the former SU were/are big enough to built “single” task aircraft in usefull numbers. As long as the Chinese do operate JH-7s they see a good chance that it is capable to fullfill the given mission. State of the art avionics, weaponary and a supporting network are much more important than dubious claims about a lack of agility or stealth. The USA do stick to higher flight levels and the related technology, when the others without that do stick to low level to overcome that shortcomings. As long as none will engage the whole US-forces that kind of warfare does still work.
The Tornado did not suffer greatly in 1991. How many missions were flown and how many Tornados lost? Some were even attributed to the lack of coordination. In reality wars were fought with weapon-systems at hand on both sides. To claim some wet wishes to alter the reality afterwards does change nothing about the outcome. All parties can look into the results and draw the lessons from that. A “Russian chess-player” had never triggered the war from 1991, the own lessons from the 80s in mind. It is stupid behavior to claim a higher loss-rate for the other side, when there was no real chance to win that war. But I am aware that it is a taboo in several countries, to question the human losses. The looser becomes a matyrer or a hero.

Sens

Normal take off is a feature seen in the JH-7, Panavia Tornado, F-111 or Su-24 as it is Max take off, having a normal take off does not imply the Su-24 has not a max take off

You are just trying to hide facts about the Su-24 to fit your really biased opinion about russian equipment.

The Su-24 flew in 1970 and started operational service in the mid 1970s, it belongs to the F-111 and B-1B strategy of flying low and fast because the vast majority of fighters in the 1970s did not have good look down shoot down capability, Russia was flying at the time mostly MiG-23s and MiG-21s and the US F-4s, with exception of the F-14 that started real operational capability in large numbers at the begining of the 1980s only the F-15 was a relatively good weapon to deal with the Su-24 in the late 1970s but it was not very numerous.

Now by the time of GWI the Panavia Tornado, Su-24, F-111 faced each other at war with relatively new air defences that were wrecking havoc among the Panavia Tornado since it was not like the F-117, SAM and AAA bateries plus fighters were a real threat, the americans did realize that the F-111 was old in terms of self defence and strategy, the Europeans did it too and developed the Eurofighter and Rafale with omnirole capability, since the USAf knew replacing on the one to on basis the F-111 with F-117 or F-22s was impossible they opted for a less capable strike fighter the F-15E.

The JH-7 started life in the late 1980s but was put into service in this decade, in fact the JH-7 is not more than an over grown AMX concept.

Now let us go to real facts.

The Tornado is much more expensive than a Su-24 and it was built in less numbers, the ratio is almost 2:1, two Su-24s for each Tornado built so any savings in fuel is over paid by several millions dollars in price, the SU-24 flew a few years before the Panavia Tornado did and contrary to your very long held idea that the Su-24 is a very fuel thirsty machine, it is not it simply has less fuel than the F-111 in fact several tonns less and only has a fractionally less fuel efficient engine but it is not as you have always claim as a big difference.

the Problem with the JH-7 is only time frame and the fact it is not as good as the swing wing aircraft developed by the Soviet Union and USA were.

The opinions of idiots like you and those you use as reference cannot be considered worth considering.

Up to now, you cannot reconcile the fundamental logical, historical, political, and technical problems of your argument which you up to now, refuses to answer.

Like you claim that the blueprints of the YE-152A was bought by China after the project was considered a failure.

Except that.

1.) The Soviet Union never sold blueprints. When they provided assistance, it was whole heartedly free for the glory of the Proletarian.

2.) The YE-152A continued to fly testing all the way up to 1965. China and the Soviet Union were already feuding years before that.

3.) The YE-152 program was not considered a failure. It was only superceded by something better. The program had a number of speed records to boot.

4.) The Soviet Union would not sell or give away plans of a strategic interceptor to any country, especially not one it has a major feud over with, and especially with someone it has a border conflict with. If the Soviet Union would give away blueprints to anyone, why not India or Warsaw Pact? China would be at the bottom of the list.

5.) The Soviet Union would not give away such plans to a country it knows is developing nuclear weapons because such a plane can be a nuclear delivery platform. Especially when such a plane is breaking speed records. In fact, China successfully tested its A-bomb well before the Ye-152 project was terminated.

6.) It you have given away the blueprints to a project that was finished and terminated, you would expect that the blueprints would include the latest and final versions of the aircraft. Sorry but no deal when you post pictures of the earlier YE-152. If the SU gave away the blueprints after the project was done, it would have included the final design of the aircraft. Unfortunately to your argument, the J-8I lacks features of the final Ye-152.

7. ) The twin engined Ye-152A is nothing but the single engined aircraft hacked for twin engines. Internally that would be fundamentally different in design from an aircraft that was built from the start and end to have twin engines like the J-8I.

So for all the idiots trying to prove the J-8I was from the Ye-152, you must also prove that Soviet Union must be EXTREMELY STUPID, not to mention virtually accusing the powers at be and Mikoyan Guvenich OKB of an outstandingly TREASONOUS action.

Man all your excuses are the typical excuses found in people who do not want any influence in Chinese early programs but in fact all your reasons are flawed

A) the twin engine Ye-152A first flew in 1959 and was in the design boards in 1957-1958 so that is several years before beyond any Soviet Chinese rift, in fact just a few months after the MiG-21 had its first flight, of course you are going to get excuses like the Ye-166 or Ye-150 or Ye-152-1 in order to confuse your self more

Now you have to ask your self what Mikoyan wanted with the Ye-152 and Ye-150? well they were looking for the MiG-23, like in the case of China, the Soviet Union wanted to replace the MiG-21 with a scaled up MiG-21 they designed even the K-9 air to air missiles for the program and the Orugan 5 radar system , however contrary to China, the Soviet Union had a very advanced chemestry and jet engine industry, when the Soviet Union copied the Nene jet engine the problem they had at that time was of metalurgical nature, however the Chinese were not able to copy the R-29, the Russians in fact got some metal samples from the Rolls-Royce company and a few Nenes to copy thanks to that they could analyse the alloys needed for better engines than the had before the Nene.

however the Ye-152 was not really a very advanced aircraft as you want to portrait, the K-9 was not a very advanced missile, it was years behind the R-23 and R-40 and basicly the Ye-152A was a large twin engine MiG-21.

The Russians were also experimenting with more powerful engines, the R-15, this engine was an economical option to the less powerful R-11s fitted to the Ye-152A, however the Ye-152-1/Ye-166 and Ye-152M had small crampted nose radome inlet cones, this did not allow them to house large radars like the Smerch or guide missiles like the AA-6/R-40 and achieving Mach 3 as later the specifications demanded for the MiG-25, China suffered the same troubles with the J-8I, they need to fit a larger nose radome and side inlets to cure the same troubles the Ye-152-1, MiG-21, Ye-150 and ye-152A had.

So by 1964 the Soviet Union Started the development of MiG-25 and MiG-23.

Now why the Ye-152 was important well simply, engines, the R-15 jet engine to be specific, for the Russians the R-15 was the most important aspect of the design since the K-9 missile never entered service.

Did the Russians deliver the engine of the Ye-152M to China, the R-15 that also powers the MiG-25? no they did not, in fact the Ye-152A was not as important as you claim it was basicly an interim design to study the Ye-152-1 configuration before the R-15 was ready.

So basicly China got the interim design and not the main aircraft and the Russians knew the Ye-152-1/Ye-166/Ye-152M were far ahead of what China could built because the Chinese were at least 30 years behind in engine design in 1959.
The single engined Ye-152M with K-80 Nato name ASH or AA-5

Throw a counter question. F-15 Vs. F-16…. The 2 have their roles. J-10 and J-11B have their roles. Now before some of you jump on me saying how on earth can crappy J-10/J-11 be compared to F16/F15 (or vice versa), it is just an example. You can look at it sorta something like a PRC version of F-15/F-16 combo.

It will depend in weaponry and in performance, if the J-11 is more agile and has better weapons well it will beat it, however the J-10 maybe is in the class of the Su-27in agility and weaponry i guess both are equally matched.

Another document that is full of holes. Shenyang never made the Yak-18. It was a company in the south called Nanchang. And neither did Shenyang ever made any helicopters.

Yeah yeah Crobato in the comunist world you do not see that several factories built parts or equipment for others, since they are not capitalist enterprises but state owned the name does not matter, they will build equipement even if it is not made originally by them, this can happen when the original maker has over demand and under capacity to manufacture.

In fact see this

.

Founded on 29, June 1951, SAC is one of the backbone enterprises in the AVIC (Aviation Industries of China), CorporationⅠ. In the past half century, ever since its foundation, SAC is in the forefront of the manufacture, design and development of aerospace vehicles, including the first China-made jet fighter aircraft F-5, the first China-made jet trainer aircraft FT-1, the first China-made supersonic jet fighter aircraft F-6, the first China-made ground-to-air guided missile Red Flag No.1, the first China-made double Mach number jet fighter aircraft F-7, and the first hi-altitude and hi-speed fighter aircraft F-8.Wholly independently developed by the Chinese, the last 50 years have seen SAC building more than a dozen types of aircraft numbering several thousand , thus making a contribution of great importance to the build-up of China’s national defense, for which, SAC is known as the “Cradle of China’s fighter aircraft”.

http://sactrade.en.alibaba.com/aboutus.html

They say they have built several dozen types of aircraft in the last 50 years not only J-8, MiG-15s, MiG-19s even the F-7 a product by Chengdu;)

Shenyang Aircraft provided assitance to the Harbin Aircraft Manufacturing Corporation (HAMC) and Xian Aircraft Company (XAC) for the production of the H-6 (Badger) under a licensing agreement from the Soviet Union. Shenyang Aircraft provided assitance to Nanchang Aircraft for the production of the Q-5.

http://www.fas.org/nuke/guide/china/contractor/sac.htm

More BS from you. East Wind wasn’t even a Delta. The J-8I does not look the same as the Ye-152. Why man, you are jumping for more revisionism by claiming that the J-8 started from East Wind. They have very different requirements to start with. Read the fact that China needed something to go after the F-105 Thunderchief.

WTF would the Russians give the Chinese the blueprints, when they know it may be used against their own aircraft?

You cannot admit you are totally defeated on this subject.

Crobato

what did build China in 1969 was behind what Russian built in 1969, the Soviet Unoin built MIG-25s and Su-24s, China built scarsely 100 J-8I and Russia built 1200 MiG-25s for the SU the Ye-152 was already obsolete, your theory is foolish because for the Chinese the J-8I was high tech however for the Soviets the Ye-152 was only an experimental aircraft, passing documentaion of an old design without even future in the Soviet air force was deemed really not a top secret as you claim they had knowledge to build better things than the Ye-152A

Is that all you can answer now?

You cannot reconcile the HISTORICAL references and the TIMELINE.

The Ye-152 program was only starting when China and the SU were already having tensions. It was far from over when they actually split. So where is your argument that the Chinese were given plans for a failed project when the decision for it to be a failure was MADE LONG AFTER THE SPLIT.

You cannot reconcile the STRATEGIC MOTIVATION.

The fighter is a strategic interceptor for the PVO. The SU does not share that with its allies MUCH LESS GIVE THE BLUEPRINTS FOR FREE.

And to a POTENTIAL ADVERSARY to boot.

You cannot reconcile the DESIGN.

There are fundamental internal differences between a fighter that was designed to be single engined and one that is double engined to begin with. The Ye-152A was a hack job for a twin engined platform, the fact that it was really designed as a single engined fighter explains the many crucial differences.

You are the one who can not admit facts, the Ye-152 was the only type of aircraft china could had built that is the reason the J-8I looks like the Ye-152A they did not have better engines than the R-11, no better technology than copies of the MiG-21 in fact the only option and real Historical fact is they built an scaled up MiG-21 but they could not build a Ye-150 because they did not have R-15 equivalents yeah so information on the Ye-152 was a must and the Russians say they got it, the J-8 was not started in 1964 as many think but as early as 1958 with the East Wind project

What you’re saying is pure BS if you ask me, since you don’t have the proof even from OKB MiG’s own history.

The fact remains the Ye-152 was primarily designed as a single engined fighter, the twin engined one was a test platform alternative. as a matter of fact the second Ye-152A was converted back into single engine.

The J-8 on the other hand, was built as a twin engined fighter from the start. The whole physical design of the Ye-152 was for a single engined, and the twin engined one was only meant to test the plane while it was awaiting its real engine. That means your structural airframe and intake-engine duct design would have been very different.

Here is a googled translation of the J-8 history. Note how much more information. You get dates, you get names of people, even results of test flights and specific details of their problems for example. That’s quality information, not innuendo.

***

May 1964 in the air by the Institute developed on the basis of MiG-21 high-altitude high-speed fighter. In October the same year programme to combat demonstration for the Air Force’s B-58 bombers twice the speed of sound at high altitudes and F-105 fighter-bombers. Prior to 1000, such as Huang of the Shenyang Aircraft Research Institute, in the MiG-21, F-7 aircraft systems theory, finished annex and test methods such as in-depth research, and the aircraft wreckage to the United States in the annex were analyzed. This imitation of the F-7, F-8 to design a technology reserves. July 1963, Huang Xu Shunshou 1000 together with a “62-(Mig – 21 type) aircraft design work of the key technical issues and research projects,” Technical Report summarizes the “thoroughly” in the work results and experience. In this way, China’s aviation industry has steadily to a self-designed Mach 2 times the speed of sound fighters – F-8 new stage.

To meet requirements of high-altitude operations, the Shenyang Aircraft Design by F-8 design idea: Focus on high-altitude, high-speed performance, increased range, improved climb rate and the strengthening of firepower. Identify design options, the adoption of “single” (Ap-style layout, but we are now into the development of the F-known -9, with the development of a new turbofan engine), or a “double” (with two improvements are a turbojet engine -7); “nose inlet” or “both sides Inlet” key technical issues, there is a heated debate.

Tang Yan-president of the Institute for Aviation, 1000 by Huang, Nan TING consistent with the views of experts such as “feeling river stones, to win the first battle,” and step-by-step strategy. Decided to adopt a “double” option. The programme literally behind the single programme, but in fact the plan was too ahead alone, can not be realized. Thus, “double” increase the feasibility of developing the plane. Based on the above views, and the MiG-21 decided to adopt a similar “nose intake” program, the reference to MiG-shape – 21, did not make major changes, a big sweep, small aspect ratio, thin delta wing, the next Hirao, double layout Fuqi aerodynamic form. The MiG design bureau in the MiG-21 developed on the basis of E-152 series of large-scale single fighter, the West has been speculation F-8 derived from the design of E-152, but there is no big two points in common, and also the starting point different.

Selection of the programme two turbojet -7 A (WP-7B) engine, the largest single thrust 43.15 KN, a single thrust Afterburner 58.8 KN. Here must also be discussed turbofan -6. December 1960 the Central Military Commission decided to set up the Institute of Aviation, in August 1961 in the form of Shenyang Aero Engine Design Institute. Miss Wonderland engine renowned experts was appointed deputy director of technology, technical awarded the rank of Colonel. The Institute for the MiG-21 “thoroughly imitation to design their own” played an important role, the MiG-21 engine thoroughly formed a relatively mature turbojet -7 series. At that time the country’s industrial foundation is weak, the development of the aviation industry by big powers to contain and blockade, and take the road of the introduction of digestion, is a wise move. Specific “to digest the introduction of” is, in fact, the first step is carried out first F-8, the decision-making process as mentioned above; engage in the second step annihilation -9, that is, high-altitude high-speed, all-weather fighter, supporting the Afterburner-turbofan engine project No. turbofan -6. F-8 successful service, but the F–9 later detained. With the support of the identification, on May 17, 1965, Luo Ruiqing chief ratification of the new F-combat mission to develop indicators and skills, and officially named the F-8. Shenyang Aircraft Design (601) to specific tasks.

Former general secretary of Hua Guofeng’s inspection tour of F-8. Air Force World:: China’s super Mig – 21: F-8

F-8-after the success of the programme, further implementation of the programme on both sides of intake (F-8 is more than history, the simple fact that the MiG-21 is the magnification, and “further proposals” is the Jian-8 II) . May 17, 65, chief of the General Staff approved the F-8 Luo Ruiqing the tactical and technical indicators and research task. September 65 design work in full swing. Huang, chief designer of the year 1000 in a helicopter crash in the unfortunate victims abroad, the new machine for the technical work of the leadership of Ye Zhengda, Nan TING as the chief architect of the Office for specific organizations. In December, wooden prototype through a review of the following year in March-site design. Early 67 issued corresponding documents, factories began Preparation. July 1968, the first batch of two F-8 assembly completed. July 5, 1969, by Yin-huan driving the prototype made a successful maiden flight. December 1979 F-8 design stereotypes. December delivery of the air force the following year trial, in 1981 the Air Force began equipment.

F-8 highlights high-altitude, high-speed, increased range, increased the rate to climb to enhance performance such as firepower. Compared to the F-7, the performance indicators have improved. Maximum speed of M2.2 maximum Its 20,000 meters above the maximum climb rate of 200 meters per second; basic 1,500 km range and a maximum range of 2000 kilometers; set out in the height of 19,000 meters air combat; installation of improved design The Gun and air-to-air missiles, from the installation of the larger search radar. F-8 Inlet to the nose, big sweep, small aspect ratio, delta wing thin, under-tail, double layout Fuqi aerodynamic form. Aircraft Thrust-Weight Ratio of 0.89, better than the F-7 aircraft. These indicators, in addition to a radar, the F-8 design requirements are successfully met. Such as the United States, “firebee” Its practical largest UAV 18,300 m, B-58 supersonic bombers practical Its 19,248 m, and F-8 are fully capable of shooting down. F-105 and the comprehensive combat capability although far more than F-8, F-8 However, if the high-speed pursuits encountered so, it can hardly escape easily. However, the level of the electronics industry led to the backwardness of the most critical Fire Control System radar did not successfully developed, resulting in greatly reduced the combat effectiveness of F-8.

High-speed F-8 is an important indicator. Thus F-8 Gu Songfen deputy chief designer of the Mach number of the F-7, the direction of the Stability and flying qualities to annihilate – 8 provided the basis for design. 601, the Shenyang Aircraft plant, aerodynamic department of experimental research on the technical staff with Beijing Aviation Academy Professor Lu Scarborough, Xu Fang, and so do a lot of wind tunnel tests and research analysis, the F-8’s vertical tail design and Fuqi . End up as a single vertical tail area with double Fuqi.

F-8 encountered in the development of the wing flutter is the most dangerous aeroelastic phenomenon, but also restricting aircraft maximum speed an important factor. Pilot Luming East despite repeated flight risk, Gu Songfen to participate in the high-speed wind tunnel tests oil flow model aircraft, and ground resonance test case, the vibration is derived from spoiler, the preliminary settlement of the problem. Unexpectedly, after eight years later occurred when Transonic vibration phenomenon. Gu Songfen three by driving from the East F-Luming -6 supersonic trainer of the sky, followed by F-8 flight, observed filming the back of the flight line spectrum, and further determine the airflow triage area. The final adoption of partial repair to eliminate air-separation method, and thoroughly solve the problem. Its supersonic vibration in the Mach number is 1.24, by the power of the system vibrations. 601 (Shenyang Aircraft Research Institute) by reference to foreign prototype design, the design of the new damping extinguishers, in the installation of rudder on the Elimination of the supersonic vibration. (Site station Note: do not know how to, but not the LAB This is the great thing done, or negligence in the design.)

Also in 1970, F-8 found in the Mach number, altitude after emerging in the problem of excessively high body temperature. Improved forced cooling method to solve the problem initially. In 1976, the F-8 pilot flight Mach number of large long after the discovery of body temperature is too high, the resistance umbrella and burned umbrella module. 601 Solutions thinking fitness, and 606 of Wang Xu, Shenyang engine plant Heshu love, and others increased cooling common trap door opened, cooling air flow path adjustment, and aim to reduce the engine wall temperature, Annex local products such as cooling and insulation measures can solve the problem of overheating.

Gu Songfen test and inspection, etc. at the scene after the F-8 prototype fuselage overheating.

Air Force World:: China’s super Mig – 21: F-8

Improvement in engine design, hollow leaves Technical problems also made a major breakthrough. To increase the thrust of the engine, turbo-ago about the need to improve the temperature was 100 degrees, but the turbine blades can not afford such a high temperature. 1964, 621 deputy director, casting experts to the use of hollow-cooled by leaves. At that time the technology from abroad just engage, in a highly confidential. – Branch and the Shenyang Institute of Metal, 606, engine plant in Shenyang co-operation and work together key. Shenyang Shi Changxu metal Institute, under the auspices of the Organization Technical problems and overcome the technical difficulties blade casting. First choice for the core in the nearly 100-millimetre-long blade on the uniform thickness ranging from the hole, and the youngest only 0.8 mm aperture. After developing the corresponding mold, have been resolved from batteries, ultrasonic measurement of wall thickness, and other technical issues. 66 developed China’s first gas-cooled porous film cast nickel-base superalloy blades, the engine installed in the test successful, become the world’s second aviation engine used in the foundry air leaves the country. F-8 engine prototype also repeated air parking incident, the initial move to limit the installation of the accelerator card solution, after several incidents of this kind. 601 Liuchunxi, 606 Chiang Yi-he, Shenyang engine plant Ji-Cheng Liu and other restrictions to the installation of the accelerator card and the angle of attack dynamic compensation equipment, the installation of the engine in reverse expenditure laminates, adjusting ring pressure points and other measures, the ultimate solution to the air parking problem. The aviation industry to improve access to scientific and technological achievements second prize.

Air Force World:: China’s super Mig – 21: F-8

F– 8 in the development process due to the special historical era, the guiding ideology and technical capabilities, and other factors, is a mess. Only the first prototype in a test flight, engine and finished the regular failure grounded more time than the duration of the flight. The test should be adjusted in the factory to complete the flight, but in fact did not do so, the longer flight time, increase the difficulty of resolving the issue. Technical and administrative command system several changes, personnel changes too, had also affected the development process. Practical until F-8, has been lagging behind the needs of the situation, U.S. warplanes to a comprehensive low-altitude high-speed Penetration, F-8 immediately become tasteless. At that time, the development of institutional constraints too numerous serious impact on the debate F-8 progress. 20 years later, some people LAB chief personal capacity also made a doubt, of course, GU chief of the division has always been good, the details of the problems that we should not be exaggerated.

From the test process, the July 5, 1969, the F-8 aircraft from Yin-huan driving the success of the maiden flight. “Great Cultural Revolution” greatly hindered the development of the F-8, the first test flight after the leading group, the joint headquarters have been disbanded, regulations, has been damaged, and Nan longevity, Gu Songfen, such as Feng has been the bell stop working. F-8 was at a standstill position. So until 10 years later, in December 31, 1979 F-8方才design stereotypes, and power installations as turbojet -7 B (WP-7B) engine. One year later, the aircraft started to equip our troops. , In the June 25, 80, Shenyang F-8 aircraft factory destroyed in the accident, resulting in the aviation sector to effectively control the quality of aviation products from the production process confined to advance scientific research, design, Preparation, production and after-sales service the whole process. 30-1 weapons by two 30-mm cannon, can be linked to four air-to-air missile. The chart shows that, the F-8-day use of MiG-21 F is the first open-hatch design.

I do not neeed a single book i can visit russian sites like airforce Ru or Strizhi which have different opinions as i have shown you in Russia there is not a single monolithic opinion and some people say the YE-15A documentation was given of course you won`t admit that for you those are fan boys and your sites a muture boys yeah my milkshake is better than yours argumentation
Документация по Е-152А (без двигателей, ракет и РЛС) была передана Китаю, который использовал ее при создании истребителя-перехватчика J-8. this says they sold the documentaion of the Ye-152A to China to build the J-8I

Here take a note on this one.

http://wp.scn.ru/mig_okb/planes-exp-e152m

LOL, for all the time, right up to the Sino-Soviet split, the Ye-152 was in fact a SINGLE ENGINED FIGHTER fitted with a very different engine, the R-15.

It was only long after this, in 1965 at least, that the Ye-152M had the two R-11 engine configuration.

The evidence of the time line and MiG’s own direct history is totally against you.

The Ye-152A first flew in 1959 before the Soviet Chinese split

Первый полет: 1959 means first flight and the date is 1959
Самолет Е-152А, продемонстрированный в полете на авиационном празднике 1961 года в Тушино

see that already in 1961 was displayed in Tushino air show

http://www.airwar.ru/enc/xplane/e152a.html

Первый полет 10 июля 1959 first flight July 10 1959

http://www.testpilot.ru/russia/mikoyan/e/152/a/e152a.htm

Описание Description
Разработчик ОКБ А.И.Микояна Built by Mikoyan Gurevich
Обозначение Е-152А designation Ye-152A
Кодовое наименование НАТО Flipper NATO designation Flipper
Первый полет 10 июля 1959 first flight 10 July 1959
Тип Всепогодний истребитель-перехватчик type fighter interceptor
Экипаж, чел. 1 Crew one pilot