Well, I haven’t posted here for a while, so I better rectify that!
Oh, some lovely shots by the way!
Cheers
Paul
Well, I haven’t posted here for a while, so I better rectify that!
Oh, some lovely shots by the way!
Cheers
Paul
Clark YH (19% at the root, 12.2% at the tip) was the section used on the Hurricane.
If you need a good reference for airfoil sections, then this is the best I’ve found:
http://www.ae.uiuc.edu/m-selig/ads/aircraft.html
Cheers
Paul
Like all of us, I was very saddened to hear of his passing.
By all accounts a true gentleman, and like his achievements in aviation, he will never be forgotten.
Cheers
Paul
Maybe a moderator could please alter the title of this dredged up ancient thread, it gave me a bit of a fright till I realised I wrote it!
Yes, might be a good idea, as this is the second time this thread has nearly given me a coroany! 😮
Cheers
Paul
Outstanding, thank you! 😀
Yes, thanks for the update jackattack. 🙂
Cheers
Paul
Thanks Mike! 🙂
Arrived this week what a beast!! This Packard 266 is hopefully going in the MkXVI
Thanks for the picture & update Fluffy.
I meant to correct my post earlier, but never mind! 😮
So, what MK of Merlin does MK356 have at present?
Cheers
Paul
Merlin Pete is right in that a few MKIX’s have two speed, single stage Merlins, such as the 25, 224, & 225, whilst the ‘Baby’ Spits often have the 35.
I think MK732 had a 224, and I thought that PT462 did too.
However, MH434 did have a Merlin 66 (it’s having an engine change now – I don’t know what will be fitted) but I think it’s possible to fit a two speed single stage blower to one (I seem to recall Fluffy mentioning that they where fitting a two stage blower to one of the 224’s from the Lanc to go in the MKIX), so it’s possible that maybe one of these was fitted to 434, but I was always under the impression that it had the correct supercharger, as when I’ve seen pictures of it with the cowlings off, the supercharger takes up more space than that of the two speed, single stage variants.
I don’ t have the pilots notes for the MKIX to hand, but it mentions the gear change altitudes. And I did have some power ratings for the Merlin 61/63//66/70 somewhere – I’ll see if I can dig them out.
One thing to bare in mind is that often even though a Spitfire might be listed as having Merlin 45 for example, it might be built around the block or use parts of a different Mark.
I seem to recall that the engine they are rebuilding for AR501 was an example of this.
[EDIT]
Here’s a link that has the Horsepower ratings (you’ll need to scroll down a bit) for the M63, 66 & 70:
http://www.spitfireperformance.com/spit9v109g.html
You might also like to check this page too, as it has a M66 HP chart:
http://www.spitfireperformance.com/spitfire-IX.html
Cheers
Paul
why did they have to pull it up like that?
JH
John,
Because that is what is needed to enter a wingover!
As you can see from the clip, after the (gentle) climb, it banked right to start the wingover, but sadly the left engine lost power at this critical moment (low airspeed and high thrust from the other engine), which caused the loss of control and subsequent spin.
As you say, they recovered from the spin, but sadly had insufficient height to complete it.
I suggest anyone who has not read the AAIB report does so.
Cheers
Paul
Thanks for that Steve.
A much missed aircraft that was a testament to those who looked after and restored her. 🙂
Shame that she now sits lifeless at Hendon.
I’m still kicking myself that I never saw her in the flesh! 😡
Cheers
Paul
Late last year Hurricane IIc PZ865 of the BBMF had new more authentic exhaust cans fitted. Does anyone know if any of the other fighters will be fitted with these style cans over this winter?
Only 3 more fighters qualify for this mod. they being Hurri IIc LF363, Spit IIa P7350 and Spit Vb AB910.
Yes Spade Grip, I believe they are.
“We look forward to reconfiguring the exhausts on LF363, P7350 and AB910 to original specification next year”.
Cheers
Paul
Spitfire tracking towards Guildford at about 15.25 today.
Couldn’t make out which one, but looked like a MKIX. 🙂
Out of Goodwood perhaps? :confused:
Cheers
Paul
I think no one can doubt the huge amount of effort that TFC and the other participating organisations put into Flying Legends. You only have had to have read that post from BeaufighterVI’s last year to see the kind of effort that goes into making sure as many aircraft are on the flightline at the weekend of the show as possible.
But I feel many true enthusiasts might not return if they have a bad experience with parking, traffic flow, rude staff, people using stepladders on the fence etc, all of which, in the case of Flying Legends, are out of the hands of TFC.
As we all remember, there were some big complaints about these kinds of things on this and other forums last year, and I think the sad thing was that the organisations who operate the aircraft took it as a knock at them, which clearly it wasn’t. 🙁
Whilst £30 pounds is nothing when it comes to say, one hours operating cost of a Spitfire, people don’t see it like that, and they of course have a right to complain if they feel that their enjoyment, of an otherwise excellent flying display, has been spoiled by some of the things I mentioned above. And this goes for any airshow, not just Flying Legends or the other Duxford shows!
As for getting more ‘non enthusiasts’ into Legends, I don’t know the answer, but from my experience, I always seem to bump into someone who doesn’t know too much about the aircraft on display, and it’s a pleasure to answer their questions. Oh, maybe it might help if the flightline walk was included in the price of the ticket. Then perhaps the non-enthusiasts, who might not have been inclined to go for the extra few quid, would. Maybe an airfield attack sequences with the mentioned pyro’s might bring more of the general public in (you have mentioned the practical reason why it’s not possible), but I must say this doesn’t really appeal to me, and I like the format of the show as it is now.
Cheers
Paul
Tangmere,
You’re right of course, and I think HM Revenue & Customs has, over the last few years, clamped down on those who make a sizeable income from eBay trading and don’t declare it.
I mangaged to find the article on the Times website and below is the paragraph I was refering to:
“To add to the fun the definition of what constitutes taxable income can change at no notice. This year, for example, the Revenue is taking a special interest in eBay and is about to determine how many transactions in cyberspace make the person involved a de facto “trader” — meaning that the “profits” made from buying and selling children’s toys from McDonald’s Happy Meals are taxable”.
So it seems (if it ever gets introduced) that if the casual eBayer made say, £500 quid over the course of 12 months selling the odd few things from their loft, garage, book collection or whatever (the kind of stuff most people want to get rid of and use eBay for), and sold enough items to get them classed as a “trader” by HM Revenue & Customs (and who knows what the number of transactions will be), this will now be classed as taxable income.
How daft! :confused:
It seems this is just another way for the Government to get more money off us. 😡
Cheers
Paul