Lovely pics. Nostalgic. Any of UK operators in PMI in the same era ?
I just love these old aeroplanes too, guys.
I recall a Condor DC-10 taking off in sparkling silver fuselage and with just a yellow fin. Pamla must have been an amazing place in the late 1960s with the Spantax and other Douglas pistons based there. I suspect all those DC4, DC6 and DC7 aircraft came to Gatwick and Heathrow on some summer days. I lived near Heathrow and we heard a regular (newspaper) Iberia flight trundle over into the airport about 11pm when everyone else had just about gone to sleep. I believe that was one of the Spantax DCs or another Palma based DC operator. 🙂
We only photographed 2 UK operators as we were only there a couple of hours and it wasn’t so busy as it is today (but the airlines and types were better IMHO. 😉
Palma was pretty deserted of all but a handful of families who’d come to watch the aeroplanes, as I recall. Sounds like it is now as busy around the perimeter as on the runway. lol
SMXFAN… I had no idea there was a viewing gallery to go and watch from. It looks like the old one that Gatwick used to proudly have. I saw those people and thought they were just pax waiting to depart.
Sarah
Orion 737-200 – I thought this had a nice livery
Dan-Air London 737-200
Here is Palma from 1983. The airport has changed a lot, as have the aircraft types and airlines that visited it.
Spantax, Hispania and Aviaco were the two main spanish airlines that were based there with CV990s, DC8s, DC9s, Caravelles and F27s. Quite a wide set of aeroplanes to see in one place. Visiting types were BAC-1-11, Caravelle, DC9, DC-10, DC8, 707, 727 and 737. Air Berlin were using a B737-200 and I see they are using a 737 still.
Finnair operated their DC8 on charters during 1983
Caravelles were operated from Palma by Hispania

Regional scheduled routes were by Aviaco Friendship
Euralair was a French charter operator
Iberia operated shedules to Pamla
Sterling had recently begun using 727s instead of Caravelles
The old runway had aircraft that were retired (Spantax CV990s and TAE DC-8s

Hapag Lloyd used A300 and 737s
Conair Boeing 720b jets were in a great livery
Busy Bee 737 livery from a time when fin markings were PAINTED on!
Braathens SAFE operated a fleet of 737s
Some Spantax Convair 990s were still in use
Yes! This is the old issue come back to haunt us all. Should a computer fly the plane or should the human do it? I think Airbus has stepped over the line into dangerous lands with their systems (designed by NON-pilots as nJAYm points out!).
These auto-flight systems are subtly taking away the flying instincts from airline pilots that they grew up learning on Pipers and Cessnas.
Like
… a quick and positive response to a stall warning system
(all three pilots ignored the stall warner for over a minute).
… and a clear verbal understanding about who is the handling pilot at any time
(both ‘first officers’ were hands on and when the left seater attempted to lower the nose he was unaware that the other guy was still pulling the stick back and holding the aeroplane in a fully stalled condition).
And they should have jumped up and taken action when they heard the radio altimeter react at 4000 feet. Admittedly the 330’s RA voice alert said “pull-up pull-up”; not helpful when in a nose-up stall condition. Older Radio Altimeter systems would have said “Terrain Pull-up” and this would give a different message over the ocean (eg: we are going into the sea).
But any pilot understands that low/no airspeed, nose high and in a fast descent = deep stall.
I can’t see why this accident happened except to think nobody was actually the pilot-in-command, everyone was ‘discussing’ like a good team crew.
Airline pilots need to fly hands-on more and fly auto-flight systems less. Computer systems are not yet so reliable that pilots are ‘stand-by’ systems. I doubt they ever will be in my lifetime. Until computers are more reliable and safer than humans we should safeguard those flying skills of the pilots rather than teaching them to become systems operators who are over-reliant on the FMS.
Maybe I am just getting old but this is one of the most disturbing crashes I have heard about. No engine fell off, no stabilator runaway happened, no structural failure. A perfectly servicable aeroplane and three pilots doing their best to recover from a stall (!!) and 220 people die for what? No meaningful reason I can see. It is really sad.
The documentary said a single pitot de-iced. As there are three an auto-flight system would use the value from the two best readings. If only one of the three pitots were giving an airspeed indication I would expect the auto-flight system to drop out.
The thing that disturbed me most was that there was no clear agreement about who was the handling pilot at any time after the aircraft stalled. Both co-pilots were flying it at the same time. And they were unaware of this. In a standard cockpit aeroplane it would be very obvious if both pilots were hands on at the same time. But with the stupid little Airbus joystick down by the pilot’s side, it wasn’t clear that the right-seater was holding the nose up in a deep stall, even though the guy in the left seat was attempting to recover the aeroplane.
I feel pilots of complex transport aeroplanes need to go back to basics when things go wrong…
Attitude and power = airspeed.
Stall warner sounding = lower the nose.
Also after the Teneriffe 747 collision (PanAm and KLM 747s collided on runway in fog) the standard ‘Captain = god’ mode of crew operation was changed to the ‘All Pilots are members of a Team’ mode. We saw the down-side of this beaurocratic ‘lets discuss things together’ approach in this tragic accident. The captain should be the active commander of the flight IMHO.
TonyT wrote…
>>two of the rocker switches are the mags, and people do not turn them off, no longer a key! So unless locked up easily stealable.
I agree with the points you make. All very good ones. But this particular aeroplane had standard key-operated mags.
You can see the standard Piper mags by key on the far (bottom) left. Many older taildraggers only have a couple of toggle switches for the mags. To be honest, anyone can steal a modern light aircraft [description of bypassing key-mags removed because I don’t want to give anyone ideas :)]…
… alternatively you can prime the engine, set the throttle and go out and swing it. Swinging an American light aircraft isn’t as easy as, say a tiger moth, as the prop hits the compression stroke at a horizontal position so you have to be prepared to pull back when it fires up.
Actually, the sort of person who would steal a plane would more likely break into the flying club building and get the keys. But stealing a Piper or Cessna (or any light aircraft, most likely) is a piece of cake if you know about aeroplanes (which I would guess all plane-thieves do).So it is odd that it so rarely happens. I guess the sort of people who would steal a car for laughs wouldn’t know what to do with an aeroplane so they just don’t give them any thought. It is also good that most aerodromes and unlicenced strips are away from towns and out of sight = out of mind. I spend a lot of my life working at flying clubs and on aerodromes and vandalism is very rare indeed. I never personally came across a incident of a stolen aircraft. 🙂
Whoops! Duplicate post. 🙂
Nice little set of pictures, I never used another type of camera before I got my DSLR in June.
I went to all different areas on the airfield front and back best place I liked was right where they take of, at the front of the airfield got some great shots there.
Well, if you have only been taking pictures since June then your photos are all the more impressive!
DSLRs (like their forebears, SLRs) are the only way to take professional-level photos. My little compact camera is a Lumix (a good one) but even with the optical 12x zoom it cannot get anywhere near the performance of a DSLR. The photo of the Hurri landing shows that a slow shutter speed was used by the camera, due to the lens not having a good, wide aperture when using the zoom; whereas your air shots are perfectly sharp. But I can drop my camera in my handbag and have it around all the time, which I could not do with a DSLR.
What is good about taking photos at the runway threshold (they had a special photographers’ enclosure there) is that pilots have to stay the other side of the runway for displays. This means, unlike in the old days, they are rather forced to perform a standard pattern to get around and back in front of the crowd quickly. So at the end of the runway they often turn behind the crowd (abeam them) and back again. So some excellent close-in, turning views are seen.
I was at the runway threshold on Saturday – a great position to view the show. I can’t compete with the superb results of DSLRs but here are a few I took with my compact camera…
Spitfires about to roll…
Hurricanes about to roll…
A hurricane crossing the numbers…
I guess with these big modern jetliners there is space in the gear wells of the mains. I recall this happening back in the 1970s when someone jumped a 707 and fell out of the wheel bay when the gear was lowered for landing – dead naturally (thank god) as the stowaway didn’t take into consideration -60 degree temps and no air.
I would love to ignore the olympics from 5000 feet but the weather is too poor. 🙁
I would love to ignore the olympics from 5000 feet but the weather is too poor. 🙁
I am surprised that Tangmere1940 should have to defend this (my) thread from all those who have come over from the olympic lover’s thread to attack this one. Arthur Pewsey should be kept muzzled in his own olympic-thread back yard!
Why should Tangmere1940’s views even be considered as a subject for banning? What the hell is going on here? Political Correctness really Pisses me off. If my views are not welcome on this forum PLEASE BAN ME because I wouldn’t want to be part of any alleged forum that wishes to control people’s views.
I hate the obsessive and compulsive need to fixate excusively on sports and those elite sportsmen and women who must be madly OCD to have gotten to the top of that pointless interest. Sport is ok. Obsessive behaviour is not.
What is it about you guys that makes you need to try to criticize people who don’t agree with your viewpoint? I decided to start this thread RATHER THAN put my views on your Olympic lovers thread as I wanted to respect those views that love sport and the olympics. But why can’t you respect MY VIEWS?
Live and let live, boys. Respect other peeps’ viewpoints. When you don’t allow others to have their own viewpoints – well, that’s how wars start!
Sarah
I am surprised that Tangmere1940 should have to defend this (my) thread from all those who have come over from the olympic lover’s thread to attack this one. Arthur Pewsey should be kept muzzled in his own olympic-thread back yard!
Why should Tangmere1940’s views even be considered as a subject for banning? What the hell is going on here? Political Correctness really Pisses me off. If my views are not welcome on this forum PLEASE BAN ME because I wouldn’t want to be part of any alleged forum that wishes to control people’s views.
I hate the obsessive and compulsive need to fixate excusively on sports and those elite sportsmen and women who must be madly OCD to have gotten to the top of that pointless interest. Sport is ok. Obsessive behaviour is not.
What is it about you guys that makes you need to try to criticize people who don’t agree with your viewpoint? I decided to start this thread RATHER THAN put my views on your Olympic lovers thread as I wanted to respect those views that love sport and the olympics. But why can’t you respect MY VIEWS?
Live and let live, boys. Respect other peeps’ viewpoints. When you don’t allow others to have their own viewpoints – well, that’s how wars start!
Sarah
It seems like we collect the toys we couldn’t have as children. (Like Misrair’s impressive travel shop airliners which we all saw back in the 1960s and 1970s.
Or maybe we did have some of these toys and feel nostalgic about them even today.
Boys collect airfix aeroplane models and train sets as grown men. Girls collect dolls and doll related stuff.
I feel that when someone wants to keep the toy ‘mint and unopened they are bowing down to the adult in them that sees the value of the item.
Is there any point to it? I feel, yes and no. Yes because we have an interest and sometimes a passion for these items. But no, because any true hobby has no point. And surely that IS the point. I feel these hobbies and in fact any hobby is about switching off from the task/goal oriented world we are forced to live in as adults. So doing something that gives us ‘fun’ (a child thing) but has no real value is a great way to wind down and out of the adult survival rat-race mode we live in.
So I feel hobbies and collecting is really valuable to us psychologically. Like horse-riding, flying or sailing. No point to it, and that is the point – and a whole lot of fun.
Sarah
It seems like we collect the toys we couldn’t have as children. (Like Misrair’s impressive travel shop airliners which we all saw back in the 1960s and 1970s.
Or maybe we did have some of these toys and feel nostalgic about them even today.
Boys collect airfix aeroplane models and train sets as grown men. Girls collect dolls and doll related stuff.
I feel that when someone wants to keep the toy ‘mint and unopened they are bowing down to the adult in them that sees the value of the item.
Is there any point to it? I feel, yes and no. Yes because we have an interest and sometimes a passion for these items. But no, because any true hobby has no point. And surely that IS the point. I feel these hobbies and in fact any hobby is about switching off from the task/goal oriented world we are forced to live in as adults. So doing something that gives us ‘fun’ (a child thing) but has no real value is a great way to wind down and out of the adult survival rat-race mode we live in.
So I feel hobbies and collecting is really valuable to us psychologically. Like horse-riding, flying or sailing. No point to it, and that is the point – and a whole lot of fun.
Sarah