Originally posted by CAT1
‘yaaaaaaawn………………………..
and again the infamous sources for the FC1 development happen to be the sister’s girfriend’s aunt’s butler’s lesbian girl friend’s cook’s dog’s food supplier’s uncle in the PAF.
its funny how the first prototypes have no FBW and then all of a sudden the next two prototypes have a full digital FBW. oh and the aircraft will become operation in the next three years and this also after the next in line prototyps have a digi fbw. pakistani egns must be genious to be able to do this so quickly. ofcourse then there are the composites. the earlier prototypes didnt have them but the next ones will. now why didnt the rest of the world follow the FC1 example and add such critical technologies in mid testing phase instead of before the prototypes were assembled? comopsites may change drag coefficients, CG, wing properties, air flow properties but hell who cares. its PAF right? all this with a digital fbw will be made operational by 2006-2008. great going.
ofcourse then there are those pics of FC1 manouvering which according to some people here was enough to classify FC1 much more manouverable than LCA. but those were the first two prototypes now werent they? so why was the whole pakdef gang wagging its d**k at the thought of those two prototypes having a fbw? it was very much possible back then ofcourse. truly pathetic. and ofcouse the composites.
if i remember correctly most of you went on to degrade composites and about how they are not good and not cheap to maintain. the resin comes of, they dont last, shatter blah blah blah. in other words PAF did the right thing by buying an all metal aircraft because it was not in its budget or expertise to maintain them. now ofcourse this has become a matter of common sense. you guys should get an award for that one.
and the same people who claim that the balance of air power is readressed in the region due to PAF getting 50 mig21 clones to counter MKI are saying this. frankly if its those AF people that your friend met then they ont understand jack about how you make an aircraft. are they feeding you bull? or is your friend feeding you bull? do you even understand the problems with inducing composites in the in testing phase of an aircraft? do you know what goes on when feilding composites to an aircraft? or you may just end up altering the entire aerodynamics of the aircraft. and ofcourse this will happen with a digital fbw (which takes about 5-10 yrs for othrs countries to hardwire) and all the avionics which have still not been finalised. all this is supposed to happen by 2006-8 too? amazing. you people must have some brains working for you at PAC. good luck with you childish fantasies.
Edited to correct the spelling mistakes. sorry. still getting used to the new keyboard layout.’
Wolverine — you seem to be hurting bad about this JF-17 thing. I would suggest some serious help. Whats up can’t bear to see a half capable fighter lining up for the PAF?
:p
You need serious help. It is parallel development/production. Did you knew that EF2000 was tested in several countries at the same time? Not the same tests… So it is nothing weird to tell that next prototype will get full FBW. Seems to me that you just can’t understand production logic. Why start whining?:D
Sign In
