So the Russian wins. Maybe due to lack of knowledge of their problem but it is surely sexy and rough… I still do not understand why India never opted for that bird…
SOC, about that article.. You did read also the part that AMRAAM interlink was not adapted by both Tornado and Harrier… I just remembered those days when guns or cannons were no longer designed… Those days? I just heard that Typhoon is also partial without a gun… We are still running in circles 😀
Mr Aytal Beharu Vajpayee (prime minister India) and Putin agreed that only non military goods will be delivered. So civil version mi17? I do not see any option besides that. Anyway nice to see more choppers cause they need it desperately. Those Puma’s are getting old.
The Tornado has some problems being Brittish, German and Italian. The maintentance is a nightmare and service rate could be much better. But it is versatile when it is in the air. Some folks even added a container filled with mines under the belly. That was clearly not a success. It is also not the best ADF. Just read the AFM magazine about that. IT s nice to counter long range bombers (BVR and loitering) but for the rest I would opt for the other two.
We will see if Bush ever gets re-elected… It hink that the US ellectorate will not fall again for the votes counted by Bush family member…:D
Well only presidents that fail on earth are looking forward to maker pictures of stones on Mars… We will see what will happen to the next lander…
The aircraft carriers are symbolic. Last war the carrier was on the other side to avoid problems. Without decent defence (compare it what US uses to protect their carrier) and very easy tracking (PN subs) the carrier is not havnig any pleasant time at all.
BTW those 8XX missiles are heavy for FC1… It is airdefence fighter not coastal defence. If chinese factories become better then PAF will get products there. But is is allways handy to taste something else and share it…:D We all know what happened with Crotale…
Well hamburger boy.You told that no Pakistani posts were allowed in the LCA topic. Why are you posting these things in the FC1 topic? Double standards…
Well… This nation has more then 370 F16’s… The biggest user after US.. And you all know that it has the size of an ant? Where do they keep them and how is it financed?
So the rest of Russian arifrorce is in bad health. Within decades a lot of knwoledge will be gone. Just as the submarin efleet all the specialist will not be able to give their knowledge to the next group. The airforce is history even sooner cause things change faster and are pretty complex. As well known the aviation industry is there cause of India and China… It will be a great loss if these things will not improve.
Phrozen flame. The complexity of a cockpit is not that big as it looks on first sight. Mostly the avionics behind the hands are configured before take off… So during flight the handling it is mostly HOTAS and Stick and the important avionucs are shown on the MFD’s. On the MFD´s dhown a map, basic avionics and amrmament… It looks more complex then it is but pilots can understand the cockpit of eachother in moments… US pilots did understand Russian cockpits but they had probl+ems with feets and metres… That is all…
Cheers.
Well then the HMS system is the as the idea for JSF HMS. You just can look around and still see the avionics. They even are making an option to actually look through the aircraft… So the pilot is not blinded by some non visible parts… Superb.
About ECM… Pakistan started those projects together with their RWR receivers. Most PAF planes have that system installed. The composite part is not shocking but logic. Otherwise it will be heavy and not agile. It was Mir Ali Mushaf (May his soul rest in peace) idea to go on and make it flying. Adding avionics or improvemetns was part two…
Thanks for adding info. Some guys will keep on painting it as a papaer fighter. Well, even evidende isn’t enough for those…
Cheers.
And who should we believe? Wolverine or this guy? Well, not a very difficult question here.
Cheers.
Since this guy is a poster in the magazine…
You read the latest AFM? Then you agree with his line at Kamra… The rest is probably also true…
Usman Shabbir
Administrator Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,304
Re: Your questions for JF-17 Project
——————————————————————————–
There were five people involved in the discussion, your truly, another PakDef member (take a guess?), AVM Shahid Latif, Gp Capt Khalid Mehmood (of the Afghan fame), currently involved with the avionics of the JF-17 and another friend from the PAF. After introductions I started by asking the first question posted by Rafaqat “ 1. If PAF has conducted a training requirements assessment regarding induction of JF-17’s, how will they be met ?’’ The AVM replied that yes we are working on simulators for JF-17 and they will play an essential part in the training of future JF-17 pilots. The rest of the discussion picked up from there and we discussed almost everything related to JF-17. According to AVM the radar has already been chosen for the JF-17, though he didn’t tell me what exact radar but I guessed it when he told me some specifications and he was kind enough to acknowledge that I got the right answer One radar is the Grifo S7 and the second radar is very similar to the one found on Mirage 2000-5, the only difference is the output power, 500 W instead of the 800 W. According to AVM after the sanctions were lifted many more companies joined the race for the supply of JF-17 avionics and weapons suite and of course this gave PAF some new choices. One example of it is that now JF-17 will feature a Helmet Display System (not Helmet Mounted System), with complete ToT of course. Regarding the engine I asked the AVM that if the engine is RD-93 then what guarantees are there that the Russians will not play hard-ball later? AVM replied that the Chinese have given Pakistan written guarantees and the Chinese themselves have written guarantees from Russia which they showed to Pakistan. About the smokey engine issue the AVM told me that one reason of it was that the Chinese were using some home-made (non NATO standard) fuel and second the PAF has told the Russians and the Chinese that PAF will not accept the engine unless the smoke issue is sorted out and they have assured the PAF that this problem will be sorted out very soon.
Currently there are four PAF test-pilots involved with the project (and tons of engineers and technicians) and I asked for some pictures of the third prototype that’s under going construction (by PAF engineers) and AVM promised that I will get them soon. Other than the pictures I will also get continuous updates about JF-17 project, i.e. how many hours logged, how many prototypes completed etc. and of course a full-fledged tour of the second JF-17 assembly line being constructed at Kamra
Many of you guys must be interested in knowing the cockpit layout, right? The JF-17 will feature three large colored MFD’s and two smaller ones (for RWR, AH etc.) and also a full-fledged integrated ECM suite. According to AVM the airframe weight of the JF-17 will also go down considerably after using some composites giving the JF-17 a better 1:1 TWR.
Regarding the weapons suite there are many options available to the PAF and according to the AVM some of the weapon deals will be finalized within a month (There were many A-G and A-A missile models on his side table including one of U-Darter).
About j10:
Yes, we also discussed the J-10 for a while. Chinese have agreed in principle to supply the J-10 to Pakistan and right now PAF is waiting for a go ahead for the evaluation team. The whole process (after the go ahead to the evaluation team) is expected to take approximately a year.
__________________
I have to agree that the FC1 will have a lot of foreign parts. For the rest wait till 2005. Both LCA and FC1 will have matured designs by then.
About the parts… There have been enough lists of that. No need to point at tails or legs. The avionics are Elbit. The engine US. The bodywork from western origin. The weapons probably Russian. Same spread as the JF17…
About reducing weight. Get used to the fact that most planes are reducing weight… Every pound a lot of pounds… And the parameters are just changed even if you change the load… Nothing new to the system…
Originally posted by Wolverine
look at the amount of riveting on that aircraft……………
Wolverine. This plane is not yet including exotic composites. It is intended to be cheap and easy maintanable. The news is that it wil receive composites to reduve weight later. The bodywork is not much different from other western models so do not look as it is cheap.
1973. The plane is a first try… It has some tested ideas but some not. Maybe the LCA is more high tech but it should be just looking at the budget spended and foreign parts or help. The planes can be compared on november 2005. Then the fully BVR, FBW and latest avionics version will enter PAF. Till then it is just a testbed and even in the beginning of its tests…