dark light

PLA

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 721 through 735 (of 1,747 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: FC-1 thread – (Prototype 03 onward) #2659476
    PLA
    Participant

    some pics from cdf
    http://bbs.china.com/images/2004-07-26/1090817069003.jpg
    http://bbs.china.com/images/2004-07-26/1090817043002.jpg
    http://bbs.china.com/images/2004-07-26/1090817021001.jpg
    http://bbs.china.com/images/2004-07-26/1090816063000.jpg

    in reply to: LCA Progress #2659553
    PLA
    Participant

    If India put a lot on this project one would expect that finance would be not a major hurdle. But like this many European project suffered financial correction, just like LCA, after mismanagement of time and cash. Mismanagement is mostly in the eyes of the cash provider. It does not mean that technically it was not good enough.

    in reply to: Indian AF "Cope Thunder" Deployment #2659582
    PLA
    Participant

    Sofar I have read reports about tests in US and here in the neighbourhood… Aircrafts have fixed role in a training. Most of the time those that are for a2g stay in that role. They do not just forget that and accept A2A. They are either heavy loaded and need the fuel to go to the target, or they returned from the target and need to go back to the base asap. They wil not move into wvr like topgun a2a pilots love to do. So those Jaguars will (most) of the time do their a2g work.

    in reply to: FC-1 thread – (Prototype 03 onward) #2659847
    PLA
    Participant

    Something else that can been seen on your latest pic is that the Fc1 has the same troubles as the mirage 3/5. Leaking… Just see the oil marks on the floor and the buckets…

    in reply to: India's MiG-29K engines: RD-33MK #2659950
    PLA
    Participant

    With co-operation with western partners they probably optimized the body. So structural improvements. And there is a lot of difference between the quality of the avionics of the MKI or the standard Russian version…

    in reply to: India's MiG-29K engines: RD-33MK #2659964
    PLA
    Participant

    6000 hours? Well maybe because Russia only delivered the plane but avionics and electronics were from Israel, France and other nations. They did some optimizing. But what about the engine? The TVC needs a lot of maintenance and has not very long service period.

    in reply to: Indian AF "Cope Thunder" Deployment #2659980
    PLA
    Participant

    Jaguar and Tanker crew are top guns? The quality of this release is not high. They are bombers. Not air superiority fighters.

    in reply to: Does the LCA program make sense? #2659984
    PLA
    Participant

    And how many are medium or high tech? And how bad equipped is the opponent?

    in reply to: Does the LCA program make sense? #2660053
    PLA
    Participant

    About the cranked delta. I don’t think it is unique. There are more ways to achieve vortices and all have the same result.

    in reply to: New Mikoyan light fighter info #2660212
    PLA
    Participant

    The major difference is the inlet(s). For the rest those wings are pretty much the same. (Fc1/F16)

    in reply to: Does the LCA program make sense? #2660216
    PLA
    Participant

    Harry,
    The IAF is a huge airforce with respectable crew and planes. Do not think we make jokes about that. The reaction about losing mig21 was about India adapting high tech very fast. I think they have problems like any other airforce. Some major problems like the frequent crashes of the mig21 could have been solved faster. We can blaim the Russian. But that will not bring those pilots back. It took ages and still it is not a done deal. So with getting one of the simplest aircraft in the air is difficult enough. If they adapt very complex planes then it will not nake it much easier. Operating larger numbers, flying more hours etc. etc. OK. But there are many crashes. That is the fact. Or are you just gonna wave away that fact?

    About those f16’s… That was the result of boycot. I doubt that it was something like bad spare parts, bad maintenance or bad fuel… They had a few mishaps but if you look at the result of many years of boycot and no support then it was pretty good job. Indian airforce had not one problem at the same time.

    in reply to: Does the LCA program make sense? #2660238
    PLA
    Participant

    >>>Combine the best AWACS in the world with second or third rate fighters to do the ultimate job and you will get – nothing. This is why AWACs are regarded as force multipliers. Depends on how much force there is in the first place, to “multiply”.

    You can have next generation plane and still not win the game. It has been shown several times. The differences between the planes India is going to face are not huge… With the counterpart using AWACS as control en communication center it has a lot power. Even with your so-called second or third rate fighters. The mki’s are detected if they start to taxi. And small third rate fighterjets (with radar off) are guided to stop them. I think you overrate that super fighter status. In real combat there is more then only that.

    >>>Recent or not, the Tankers are there and intensive training has been going on for some time. They were intercontinental pretty fast. Once again, combining an ultra-long range Su-30MKI with IFR is producing another league of results.

    Then every nation should buy a few S030 and some tankers… IFR is pretty standard with fighters these days. Even medium tech planes like fc1 or LCA will have it. In the Indian scenario the flankers may need long range but the counterpart has just a few hundred km of depth… They do not need that.

    >>>No datalinking capability? Su-30s? MiG-29s? Do-228s? Ka-31s? UAVs?

    It is not holy. Their is allways something like ecm. Every nation is busy with elint and developing counter…

    >>>Also, relatively low technology with respect to maintanance and repair? AWACS, Tankers etc don’t even apply. Fact is that the infrastructure for the maintanance and repair for the top of the line technology, does exist.

    I doubt if IAF can transform direct to high tech maintenance if they had some troubles with easier maintainable planes like Mig21. And high texh has advantages but is difficult to maintain. That is a very important factor when using suoer alloys and composites…

    in reply to: Does the LCA program make sense? #2660240
    PLA
    Participant

    >>>”Low quality of fuel” is what the Russians claim among a bunch of other unsubstantiated reasons for MiG-21 crashes. It’s all a big blame game. FOD *was* an issue – the MiG-29’s anti-FOD doors never worked as advertised but they were quickly fixed, *locally*, and the MiG-29 is one of the IAF’s most serviceable aircraft today. Su-30s never had that problem and their anti-FOD grill was fine, however, when you have intakes placed that close to the ground, there is more vulnerability to FOD. Both aircraft today, along with most others, contribute to the giant sortie rate and flying hrs.

    Whether is is bad fuel or bad spare parts or bad flying due to bad training. The crashes were very high for a long period. There are many mig21 still in service all over the world. Why are Indian Migs crashing the most? I think it should have been addressed much earlier. About FOD… I don’t think that Indian environment is much worser then the F16 just a few hundred kilometers away. There are many planes with lowered intake. Taking care of FOD is a major issue for any airforce. One does not pay attention to it cause there are special doors…

    in reply to: LCA Progress #2660333
    PLA
    Participant

    > parameters of the lca are not altered

    they will be if the FC1 and J10 params are altered 😉

    please provide some details on FC1 and J10 to indicate
    which LCA params need to be altered to what.

    Actually that is the fun part when it comes to FC1. They just skipped avionics parameters thanks to boycot. It is just a hull that is finished and the rest will be the best for the money the wanna spend for it (if allowed to buy). It was the late ACM Mushaf Ali Mir that pushed ahead. I agree with you if you say that how can that be compared. I doubt that India will altger the LCA parameters. There is no unlimited time and cash for a light combat aircraft…

    in reply to: Does the LCA program make sense? #2660629
    PLA
    Participant

    Compared to India China has only contributer to its road to Chinese aviation industry: Russia. They have been extremely busy in buying and TOT. We will never know which part of these newer product are exactly Chinese parts but we can see that they are full speed in making (SU27) getting (MKK, J10 Engine, FC1 engine, several avionics and weapons) and improving (J11, Kunlun). India has several sources and the western world is less reluctant to provide. The same Arrow that was stopped going to China is openly okayed to India. Whether India is better or worse is indeed a very difficult question.

    About Pakistan. Yep they do buy the airframes. They did not like the avionics but that is getting better. India does the same with MKI. And we can not blaim them that it is a bad choice can we? Merci.

    The fact that FC1 is designed by Pakistan. That is a bit overkill. But the Pakistani input has been a very important factor for Chinese (export) products. The Pakistani have been playing around and can provide other perspectives. The FC1 is kind of F16. PAF f16 pilots are handy to optimize the Fc1. If you look very good then you will see that the first batch of the Pakistani FC1 testpilots are Sargodha F16 pilots. I can provide not more details at the moment about it.

    Cheers.

Viewing 15 posts - 721 through 735 (of 1,747 total)