dark light

BlackArcher

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,576 through 1,590 (of 3,242 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Dassault Rafale, News & Discussion (XV) #2220896
    BlackArcher
    Participant

    If we are choosing to qoute IAF pilots on the LCA , how about this gem

    “so late it is obsolete”.

    http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/02/18/india-airforce-idUSL4N0VR4NV20150218

    😀

    And yet it’s more modern than the neighbour’s soon to be most numerous fighter. Apply that officers logic- and there’s nothing to worry when we are talking about an even more obsolete fighter.

    in reply to: Dassault Rafale, News & Discussion (XV) #2220924
    BlackArcher
    Participant

    That’s it?! That’s all you have to go on?! How sad and pathetic! You dismiss raw data from other manufacturers when it doesn’t suite your views, but some obscure remark that may or may not have been made by someone in the IAF, and reported by someone you’ve dismissed several times in the past in an indian news source, is your hard data that the Tejas is “better on many significant parameters” than the Mirage 2000?! 😀 I’ll have what you’re smokin, that’s some strong s***.

    Compared to the range payload Bs you spout on the JF-17?? Lol. Come off it.

    in reply to: Dassault Rafale, News & Discussion (XV) #2220929
    BlackArcher
    Participant

    You’ve yet to show it’s better than the Mirage 2000 in ONE parameter, let alone “many significant”, according to the “people you’ve spoken to”. This is the bile that YOU introduced to this thread, not me.

    you aren’t going to believe anything I say and frankly your opinion doesn’t matter to me. An LCA TP clearly told me it matches the Mirage-20000 ITR. I don’t care about what you think. You will choose to cherry pick data that only suits your viewpoint. I don’t want this thread to be derailed by people of your ilk.

    in reply to: Dassault Rafale, News & Discussion (XV) #2220938
    BlackArcher
    Participant

    double post

    in reply to: Dassault Rafale, News & Discussion (XV) #2220940
    BlackArcher
    Participant

    Ajai Shukla, who has spoken to LCA test pilots said this

    Business Standard article

    IAF pilots that test-fly the Tejas-Mark I find it qualitatively superior to the Mirage 2000

    in reply to: Dassault Rafale, News & Discussion (XV) #2220953
    BlackArcher
    Participant

    So without any numbers, and taking your word only, it equals the M2K on one metric only, ITR, and has a lower AoA and G limit. The rest is pure speculation, and making it easier to land will improve the crash rate of the IAF, but won’t be much useful in air combat. How is that in any way “significantly better” than the M2K? :stupid:

    Did I say it exceeds the Mirage in every way? Take your bile onto some other thread and stop polluting this one.

    Besides, what’re you croaking about? The Mirage exceeds the JF-17 in ITR, and is 9G capable whereas the JF-17 isn’t.

    in reply to: Dassault Rafale, News & Discussion (XV) #2221042
    BlackArcher
    Participant

    Can you quantify that? In what way does “more than adequate” equate to “significantly better”?

    the ITR is equal to that of the Mirage-2000. The ASR itself was based on the Mirage-2000’s ITR and it has been met.

    But the STR was called as being more than adequate- by one of the TPs. As for AoA, the max is now 26 deg, since it is a 8G fighter and not 9G. the Mirage-2000 being a 9G fighter can go up to a max of 28 deg alpha.

    It is easier to land a Tejas than a Mirage-2000 and that was a point made by Grp Cpt Suneet Krishna, who was an IAF Mirage-2000 pilot prior to joining NFTC.

    in reply to: Dassault Rafale, News & Discussion (XV) #2221044
    BlackArcher
    Participant

    LOL
    Comparing apples and oranges will not make you very clever, you know… Tejas are likely to cost $10 million more per copy (that’s still cheap), whereas the Mirage 2000 upgrade also include training, tools, ground support stuff, ammunitions, etc.

    what would be the fly-away cost of a Mirage-2000 when it was last in production? AFAIR, it was in the $45-50 million range..training, tools, ground support equipment, etc. would add up to that. For the Tejas Mk1, the acquisition cost was in the range of $36-40 million which includes support and ground equipment.

    Anyhow, I don’t think anyone is going to argue that the Tejas isn’t a very cost effective fighter.

    in reply to: Dassault Rafale, News & Discussion (XV) #2221109
    BlackArcher
    Participant

    It doesn’t equate – hence my almost.

    Tejas is cheaper, but also not as good in most (all?) performance parameters.

    As per those who’ve flown it, its better in many significant parameters than the Mirage-2000. As per one I spoke to, “more than adequate”.

    in reply to: Dassault Rafale, News & Discussion (XV) #2221113
    BlackArcher
    Participant

    I wont stoop to insulting your country, you do that enough by your behaviour.

    Tender for 197 light helicopters = approved then cancelled
    Tender for Howitzers = approved then cancelled
    Tender for Naval helicopters = approved then cancelled
    Tender for light transport aircraft = approved then cancelled
    Tender for MMRCA = approved now on the verge of being cancelled

    Can you see a pattern here? Even the Indian Defence Minister has said there is simply no money, but you carry on posting the opposite, like you posted that the Rafale deal was a certainty just a few months ago….

    yawn..that is how democracies work. Unlike some other nations that get a lot of free stuff through foreign military financing and other purchases that are speeded up thanks to lack of oversight and big bribes.

    As I have stated earlier, the new approvals are for INDIGENOUS programs, not for a competition involving foreign firms. As for money, India will manage. You ought to worry about your own perilious state of finances and how you’ll continue to try to stay on par with India.

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 14 #2221120
    BlackArcher
    Participant

    http://lenta.ru/news/2015/02/11/fencer/

    Su-24MP crashed, both crew died. 🙁

    RIP.

    in reply to: Indian Air Force Thread 20 #2221123
    BlackArcher
    Participant

    Model of the latest design iteration of the AMCA

    in reply to: Indian Air Force Thread 20 #2221133
    BlackArcher
    Participant

    HAL Light Utility Helicopter (LUH)..supposed to have its first flight by mid-2015 as per HAL chairman.

    in reply to: Indian Air Force Thread 20 #2221160
    BlackArcher
    Participant

    Good pic of the EMB-145I AEWACS at AI-’15

    EMB-145I

    and a beautiful shot of a Jag IS

    Jaguar IS

    in reply to: Indian Air Force Thread 20 #2221162
    BlackArcher
    Participant

    India could sign defence contracts worth $1.5 billion for 2 Phalcon AWACS and 4 aerostat radars

    India and Israel are likely to finalise a major defence deal, which would see two more Phalcon AWACS (airborne warning and control system) and four aerostat radars, in a deal worth almost $1.5 billion or ₹9,330 crore.

    Israeli Defense Minister Moshe Ya’alon (front) stands in front of a Patriot missile battery as he speaks to U.S. and Israeli troops as U.S. Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel looks on after viewing the Juniper Cobra 14 military exercise at Hatzor Israeli Air Force Base in central Israel, near Hatzor kibbutz May 15, 2014.Reuters
    Israeli Defense Minister Moshe Ya’alon (front) stands in front of a Patriot missile battery as he speaks to U.S. and Israeli troops as U.S. Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel looks on after viewing the Juniper Cobra 14 military exercise at Hatzor Israeli Air Force Base in central Israel, near Hatzor kibbutz May 15, 2014.ReutersIsrael’s defence minister Moshe Ya’alon will visit Bangalore for the Aero-India show (18-22 February) and will be accompanied by the director-general Major General (retd) Dan Harel and the CEOs of major Israeli defence companies. During the visit, he will meet with India’s defence minister Manohar Parrikar.

    The finance ministry recently allocated funds for the acquisition for two more Phalcon AWACS.


    The AWACS have a 400 km range and a 360 degree sweep coverage, which allows detection of airborne enemy aircraft, cruise missiles and drones, much before ground-based radar can. The AWACS also acts as a potent force-multiplier, by directing air defence planes and missiles to be directed at enemy air force.

    “The CNC (contract negotiations committee) has been concluded. After the finance ministry, it will be sent to the cabinet committee on security for the final nod,” EconomicTimes quoted a source as saying.

    India is poised to finalise four additional aerostat radars – sensors mounted on large balloons tethered to the ground. India already has two EL/M-2083 radars, bought from Israel in 2004-2005 for $145 million.

    India recently agreed to acquire 250 Israeli Spice missiles, an stand-off autonomous air-to-ground weapon system for fighter jets and also Heron medium altitude, long endurance UAVs.

    It rejected a hard-sell by US for its Javelin anti-tank guided missile (ATGM), choosing to go with the initial purchase of 321 Israeli Spike ATGM launchers and 8,356 missiles at a cost of ₹3,200 crore.

    ..

Viewing 15 posts - 1,576 through 1,590 (of 3,242 total)