dark light

mmitch

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,096 through 1,110 (of 1,414 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Info about London Airports #653591
    mmitch
    Participant

    Biggin Hill has been subject to restrictions imposed by the licence. They have been trying to get support for an increase in usage.
    There was an attempt to start a commercial service from Biggin to Blackpool
    a year or so ago, but it was stopped after objections. Another problem for Biggin is that traffic using its ILS has to be coordinated with traffic to/from London City.
    If a airfield wants to change its licence it has to put in an application. This is then subjected to ‘consulations with interested parties’ Local councils, airfield users, neighbours (including NIMBYs) If there is serious disagreement, a public inquiry may be ordered by the government.
    mmitch.

    in reply to: Info about London Airports #654373
    mmitch
    Participant

    This link will take you to the Luton Spotters website.
    http://www.lutonspotters.co.uk/
    Manston’s website is being redesigned but these links will help. EUJET is starting scheduled flights from there this year.
    http://www.london-manston.com/
    London City is restricted by planning agreements on operating hours and type of (quiet) aircraft. Official website at :- http://www.londoncityairport.com/
    Biggin Hill is likewise restricted to GA aviation and not scheduled commercial flights. It can be used for diversions and was when LCY was briefly closed after 9/11.
    Official website at:- http://www.bigginhillairport.com/home.htm
    Anywhere in the crowded South East of England is going to produce a lot of objections to any increase in flights or operating hours.
    mmitch.

    in reply to: Aircraft Retirement: Ch-113 Labrador… #1606871
    mmitch
    Participant

    Welcome to the forum ‘Glen’ Nice photos to start too. It’s not often a helio is seen on the water (intentionally!)
    mmitch.

    in reply to: Question re:Hatfield Aerodrome #1610537
    mmitch
    Participant

    Thanks Papa Lima. I wonder where the use of the word hangar came from then. The US is a bit distant from Northern France. :confused:
    mmitch.

    in reply to: Question re:Hatfield Aerodrome #1610621
    mmitch
    Participant

    Interesting website there Ant. On the history page it claims that they built the first ‘hangars’ for Louis Bleriot in the 1920s. Can this be true? I thought hangars were so called in WW1.
    See:- http://www.reidsteel.aero/history.htm
    There is one mistake on that website that I spotted, the aircraft shown ’emerging from a hangar’ is not a Ba 146 but a Ba (Hawker) 1000.
    Engines at the back, not on the wings…….
    mmitch.

    in reply to: The mysterious Saldanha ghost #437372
    mmitch
    Participant

    Further to our ‘wrong airport’ stories, even commercial pilots get it wrong sometimes. See:- http://www.aero-news.net/index.cfm?ContentBlockID=cea1e228-fd9e-40c2-ac07-0e2a60680928&
    mmitch.

    in reply to: Rochester #1613640
    mmitch
    Participant

    Curses, didn’t spot this was on. I called in the viewing area a few weeks back and saw the Lightning at the back of the car park. If it goes on the gate at Marconi, BAE systems, GEC or what ever its called this week I wonder if they will tow it down the dual carriageway? That will be a photo opportunity!
    The Moth Club Tour starts from Rochester on Friday at 9am. Does anyone know if there will be many arrivals on Thursday?
    mmitch.

    in reply to: The mysterious Saldanha ghost #437437
    mmitch
    Participant

    As an airband listener, on several occasions I have heard a call to Biggin Hill tower ‘finals to land’ followed by the controllers query that they are not in sight. The old RAF Kenley airfield is a few miles away and until the pilot gets close enough to see the crosses on the runway confusion rains! A bit dodgy too as it is still a gliding field.
    mmitch.

    in reply to: Question re:Hatfield Aerodrome #1615979
    mmitch
    Participant

    Welcome to the forum, pffoto. Your website has a nice line in thoroughbred cars and aircraft. 🙂
    mmitch.

    in reply to: To wysiwyg #669849
    mmitch
    Participant

    I start flying passengers at the beginning of the line training stage (ie early/mid August). I am ZFT (zero flight time) qualified for the A340 which means my first ever landing on the real aeroplane will be after flying it halfway round the world with a full load of passengers! Perhaps they should give a discount for those brave souls!

    Those were the days (only 5-6 years ago) when a Virgin 747 or A340 bashed the circuit at Manston for an hour or two with crews changing places. They even asked for the PAPI lights to be turned off sometimes. It was the first place I saw a A340. I suppose a simulator is as good for training now but no fun for us spectators. 🙂
    mmitch.

    in reply to: Monarch A321 tailstrike #672260
    mmitch
    Participant

    I remember that Japanese 747 crash many years ago. It was used on short haul and made many landings. After a heavy tail strike it was not repaired properly and eventually the rear pressure bulkhead gave way blowing some of the tailplane off. I’m sure they check (and repair) far more throughly now.
    mmitch.

    in reply to: Monarch A321 tailstrike #672283
    mmitch
    Participant

    Wouldn’t a tail (fourth) wheel be worth fitting instead of risking that sort of damage? Concorde was one aircraft that did have one. When they are certifying a new type, rubbing strips (of wood?) are fitted when the tail is dragged along the runway at the minimum take off speed tests.
    mmitch.

    in reply to: GLA members #674527
    mmitch
    Participant

    Ren Frew, I have just read the security page on that website. Amazing.
    If only the police and operators were more accommodating at other airports. They could have the services of an army of volunteer ‘security watchers’
    mmitch.

    in reply to: A Plea for asistance regarding the Battle Of Britain! #1791320
    mmitch
    Participant
    in reply to: Halifax NA337 updated pics #1791376
    mmitch
    Participant

    That is an incredable restoration. That is the same Halifax that came out of a lake? Just like the RAF museum example did. 🙁 Thanks for the link Peter.
    mmitch.

Viewing 15 posts - 1,096 through 1,110 (of 1,414 total)