dark light

Manonthefence

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 646 through 660 (of 2,162 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: You gotta laugh #1341590
    Manonthefence
    Participant

    But entirely true

    in reply to: Attn European T-6 Owners #1342317
    Manonthefence
    Participant

    cas

    Thanks very much for the clarification. I think we got there in a round about way. 🙂

    The news from the States appears to be good, with no further cracks found. Its early days yet however.

    in reply to: Attn European T-6 Owners #1342326
    Manonthefence
    Participant

    It probably meant all C- examples. Anyway the pilot at the weekend was Dave Evans, if its the same Dave Evans then he of all people would have known the situation regarding the AD. Quite frankly HFL arent that dumb!! 😉

    in reply to: Attn European T-6 Owners #1342337
    Manonthefence
    Participant

    Ewan

    Thanks for that. I dont suppose you have a link. I couldnt find it on the CAA website. I assume its an exact(ish) copy of the FAA one.

    As an aside and relevent to nothing it was interesting to note that, at the Duxford September show last year, Taz didnt have the covers on the wings that protect/cover/weatherproof/make look nicer the spar web. The TFC example did have. I’ve only just noticed this.

    in reply to: Attn European T-6 Owners #1342495
    Manonthefence
    Participant

    The Blue Max

    The CAA hasnt issued an AD yet! My guess is that all T-6 owners will check anyway.

    in reply to: I'm back – beware. #1343066
    Manonthefence
    Participant

    This thread makes more sense than the Jackson verdict!

    in reply to: Lowestoft Air Show July 2005 #1343452
    Manonthefence
    Participant

    This is true 😉

    in reply to: Lowestoft Air Show July 2005 #1343577
    Manonthefence
    Participant

    That’s the “Misc Aviation Photography Gallery”, so wouldn’t contain any pics of the show as there’s a seperate gallery for those.

    Which has nothing in it.

    Nice Pics in the misc gallery though.

    in reply to: Breighton evening fly in. something different. #1343669
    Manonthefence
    Participant

    When I read that I rather thought what Stewart meant was:

    Quote:
    No – although Taff was there, and I even spoke to him, I did not think to ask. What a pillock I am!

    So did I, however based on past experience I dont give Stewart the benefit of the doubt any more.

    in reply to: Aerobatic Team Quiz… #1344011
    Manonthefence
    Participant

    Then ask a question then rather than start another bloody quiz. Alternatively rename this forum the Quiz forum 🙁

    in reply to: Aerobatic Team Quiz… #1344033
    Manonthefence
    Participant

    Oh look another pointless quiz

    in reply to: Competition – Spitfire thingy #1345597
    Manonthefence
    Participant

    Owwwww. No fair, this is the first time I’ve known the answer.

    in reply to: HFL ARC Open day 2005 #1345652
    Manonthefence
    Participant

    Great shots Tim

    Interesting to see the T-6 flying.

    in reply to: Wings & Wheels, Dunsfold – The late photo post #1347182
    Manonthefence
    Participant

    There are shome lovely images there Mossie, very much worth the wait.

    Thanks for posting.

    in reply to: Attn European T-6 Owners #1347534
    Manonthefence
    Participant

    Mutant

    That is effectively what the FAA have done

    “You will inspect your aircraft before its next flight unless you are away from base, in which case one single pilot journey back to base then inspect”

    They (the FAA) have just been more sensible about it. Why cant TC just follow suit with a similar AD?

Viewing 15 posts - 646 through 660 (of 2,162 total)