For those who don’t know, in opposition to the rather harmless wildlife we have in europe (thanks to centuries of hunting), on the north American continent, you are still susceptible to encounter a bear, a mountain lion, or some other sort of similarly entertaining animal in your neighborhood.
So, it would be nice for people here to put things in perspective before criticizing other’s cultures…
I agree…
Five people were killed by bears in the US in 2005…..but 30,694 people were killed by guns.
Back on topic I’m predicting John McCain will win the US presidential election.
The accident report states the aircraft was recovered…..anybody know what happened to it?
Lewis Hamilton will remain F1 World Champion 2008…..and deservedly so!
Any suggestion that Timo Glock ‘let him by’ is academic as Hamilton cannot be penalised unless it can be proved there was some sort of conspiracy between the teams (or drivers)…..and I’m sure there wasn’t.
As you say Glock stayed on dry tyres and lost a lot of ground in the closing laps to Hamilton and the other drivers who changed to intermediate tyres.
I think the feelings of the Brazilian are understandable but no, not very sportsmanlike.
Well done Lewis Hamilton and the whole McLaren team!
Lewis Hamilton will remain F1 World Champion 2008…..and deservedly so!
Any suggestion that Timo Glock ‘let him by’ is academic as Hamilton cannot be penalised unless it can be proved there was some sort of conspiracy between the teams (or drivers)…..and I’m sure there wasn’t.
As you say Glock stayed on dry tyres and lost a lot of ground in the closing laps to Hamilton and the other drivers who changed to intermediate tyres.
I think the feelings of the Brazilian are understandable but no, not very sportsmanlike.
Well done Lewis Hamilton and the whole McLaren team!
No, I meant the ‘exhaust pipe’ below the ‘vent’…..it is not easy to see as the photograph is so dark in that area.
Look on the originally posted (upside-down) photograph; it is easier to see.
I did spend some time looking at photographs of the nacelles of Ju88 but couldn’t find that ‘inlet / vent’ (or that ‘exhaust pipe’) on any of them. I did think possibly Ju188 / Ju388 but had no luck there either.
But at least we know it is German.
I agree, it looks much more natural the other way up…..so twin-engined (at least).
Now what about that exhaust pipe (?) you can just see below the vent (as opposed to inlet)? :confused:
I couldn’t make any sense of that before…..but now as a twin-engined aircraft it is in the ‘right’ place.
Supporting your Italian suggestion I thought possibly Macchi C.205 (with the intake filter missing)…
…but the bits don’t seem to be in exactly the right place.
I’m no good with Italian aircraft but what about a Reggiane Re.2005?
Very interesting photograph…..but a little difficult to say what exactly we are looking at!
To me it looks like a fuselage, probably the engine cowling area. The distinctive inlet (engine air intake?) presumably faces forward. I cannot decide if we are looking at the wing root area below the inlet (with bits of corroded wing structure perpendicular to the fuselage) or is it just the seabed? And what of the long rectangular slot below and in front of the inlet; could it be for the (corroded away) exhaust stubs of an inline engine?
Assuming of course that the fuselage is the right way up (and that it is a single-engined aircraft). :confused:
Of course I read the original article, I read all the quotes too, but only found one quote so offensive that it prompted me to make my original post. In a later post I also said…
I don’t really know (or care) who Richard Dawkins is or what he believes in (or not).
I didn’t look up the Methodist Church, the British Humanist Association or Christian Voice either as their quotes seemed to spell out their position (and at the time it was late).
I was prompted to look up Humanism however after your ‘religion for the un-religious’ post as I must admit I didn’t know what the full Humanist stance was and have a theory that people need ‘religion’ to a certain extent.
Re-reading the original article I also found the other quote by Stephen Green (of Christian Voice) amusing:
“I should be surprised if a quasi-religious advertising campaign like this did not attract graffiti.”
An attempt at a self-fulfilling prophecy perhaps? :rolleyes:
Of course I read the original article, I read all the quotes too, but only found one quote so offensive that it prompted me to make my original post. In a later post I also said…
I don’t really know (or care) who Richard Dawkins is or what he believes in (or not).
I didn’t look up the Methodist Church, the British Humanist Association or Christian Voice either as their quotes seemed to spell out their position (and at the time it was late).
I was prompted to look up Humanism however after your ‘religion for the un-religious’ post as I must admit I didn’t know what the full Humanist stance was and have a theory that people need ‘religion’ to a certain extent.
Re-reading the original article I also found the other quote by Stephen Green (of Christian Voice) amusing:
“I should be surprised if a quasi-religious advertising campaign like this did not attract graffiti.”
An attempt at a self-fulfilling prophecy perhaps? :rolleyes:
Humanism on the other hand, is religion for the un-religious.
Humanism? :confused: I had to look that one up…
According to Wikipedia:
Humanism is a comprehensive life stance that upholds human reason, ethics, and justice, and rejects supernaturalism, pseudoscience, and superstition.Humanism has appeal to agnostics, apatheists, atheists, empiricists, freethinkers, rationalists, and scientific skeptics.
…and then I had to look almost all of those up!
Sounds like it will also appeal to those suffering from pigeonholeism! 😀
Humanism on the other hand, is religion for the un-religious.
Humanism? :confused: I had to look that one up…
According to Wikipedia:
Humanism is a comprehensive life stance that upholds human reason, ethics, and justice, and rejects supernaturalism, pseudoscience, and superstition.Humanism has appeal to agnostics, apatheists, atheists, empiricists, freethinkers, rationalists, and scientific skeptics.
…and then I had to look almost all of those up!
Sounds like it will also appeal to those suffering from pigeonholeism! 😀
You’re not kidding…
I Have lots of pains in my back and knees but that comes with old age…
…fell to their deaths after ropes snapped for no apparent reason…
Gas and electric have all gone up again…
There is nothing wrong with the word dead.
Grow vegetables while sending e-mails and drinking coffee at the same time…..not easy!
My husband earns almost half as much as he did years and years ago.
…another bus laden to the brim with pensioners drives past…
I guess there was something buried in there.
My father is dead – my grandparents are all dead – my aunts and uncles and also two elder sisters – all absolutely dead.
…having a vegetable patch can save a lot of money over the years.
I must remember to bite my lip…
Deceased would be a better word. Please demonstrate some respect.
I spend half my time in the betting office just to keep warm…
…the dog went berserk…
The last thing an elderly person wants to do is start digging and planting vegetables.
I’ve reported you for insulting me and telling lies on a public internet forum.
I thought this story was about a crashed plane?
…and I thought we had a problem with thread creep! 😀
It goes something like this – if nobody believed in God would He exist?
Well…..yes, surely? Otherwise a deity is just an invention of man…
…but, as the saying goes, is necessity the mother of such an invention?