…oil companies are not going to like it, the last thing they want is cars run on water.

Have I missed something?

Since when has it been economically feasible to run cars on hydrogen (or even possible to run them on water)? And yes, I understand water is H2O but how do we get the H separated from the 2O?

I’m crap at maths; always have been, always will be…

Don’t worry; the website is promising test in other areas of the curriculum: history, geography, physics, French, RE, music…

I’ll certainly get 0/20 in music! 🙂

Tim,

Since we’ve been having a debate about it here the last few days I wonder what your views on the wreckage of crashed aircraft being dug-up. Most museums have engines and other relics on display these days, but what are your thoughts about the buying and selling of relics by private collectors?

I hope you don’t mind me asking but I don’t know if I’ll ever have such a chance again.

At least the BBC covered the event. I enjoyed the footage of the aircraft and I do feel a bit sorry for Dan Snow; those sorts of commentaries cannot be easy to do live, especially if you’re expected to keep chopping-in other commentators and interviews.

The ‘interviews’ with the veterans were truly dire; you cannot sum up the Battle of Britain in a sound-bite!

The actual statement at the beginning of the Act reads thus:

An Act to secure the protection from unauthorised interference of military aircraft and vessels that have crashed, sunk or been stranded and of associated human remains; and for connected purposes.

Another popular misconception is that the words “Military Remains” refer to human remains. Not so!

I stand corrected.

The Halifax had wing leading-edge tanks between the engines (possibly oil tanks?) also there were five or six fuel tanks in each wing and these were laid side by side (long dimension fore-to-aft) so the other tank may be one of those.

Shame on me…

No, I don’t think so…..if I was that close to a B-36…

…Vulcan…..what Vulcan? 😀